FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-23-2002, 06:49 PM   #1
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post new computers

will the new ultra super computers finally solve the intelligent design debate once and for all?
lcb is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 07:04 PM   #2
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by lcb:
<strong>will the new ultra super computers finally solve the intelligent design debate once and for all?</strong>
No. It's already been settled: ID is a bunch of empty nonsense.
pz is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 07:04 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

It depends on the brand.
Abacus is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 07:14 PM   #4
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

I feel better knowing that it has been settled. Who was the scientist who finally settled it?
lcb is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 07:30 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

Charles Darwin.
Abacus is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 07:33 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Post

ditto.
Blinn is offline  
Old 08-23-2002, 08:21 PM   #7
lcb
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: washington d.c.
Posts: 224
Post

the theory of evolution proves there is no intelligent design to the biological world? wow! a theory is a settled proof!
lcb is offline  
Old 08-24-2002, 04:27 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Post

It's as good as any other theory. The theory of gravity, quantum theory, electromagnetic theory, etc. Plus we have all of those fossils. Tons and tons of fossils.

The word "theory" used in a scientific context is most definitely not a synonym for "wild guess." But I'm sure you already knew that, genuine truth-seeker that you are.
Abacus is offline  
Old 08-24-2002, 12:06 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
Post

Yeah, there is also germ theory. Personally, I think that ID theory (icky demon theory) should also be taught in medical school alongside with germs. Has anyone ever seen a germ? NO! There is no evidence at all, just wild speculations be so called "scientists." The TRUTH of demons causing disease should be taught along side the religion of germ theory in all classrooms.
Atheist121 is offline  
Old 08-24-2002, 01:59 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Post

No.

The super-pain-in-the-ass computer (I hate computers) would have no way to calculate the existance nor the identity of the designer. Of course, the designer could make it all a lot easier for everybody by coming out of the closet, so to speak, but I don't see that happening. Therefore, we'll continue to be stuck with various translations of religious texts of doubtful veracity, as opposed to the evidence sweated out over the lifetimes of a myriad of scholors.

However, perhaps the monster mojo box might be able to calculate the laws of physics that kicked it all off - this last is strictly the specualtion of a layman and worth no more than the electrons that went into posting it.

doov
Duvenoy is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.