FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2003, 10:10 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default Race classification

I'm not sure this is a pure S&S topic, but it's an anthropological one (although highly political).

Check out the PBS site and this exercise on sorting people by race through visual identification.

I was quite surprised by how poorly I did.

Sorting People
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 10:20 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Arrow

Wow, that was surprising.
Principia is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 10:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 913
Default Re: Race classification

Quote:
Originally posted by Wyz_sub10
I'm not sure this is a pure S&S topic, but it's an anthropological one (although highly political).

Check out the PBS site and this exercise on sorting people by race through visual identification.

I was quite surprised by how poorly I did.

Sorting People
So was I, I only got 4 out of 16 correct - though the pictures you were working from were so small and at such low resolution that you really had very few clues to work on other than skin color, hair and gross facial features. That's my excuse anyway, whether I'd have done any better with 8x10's I don't know.
LeftCoast is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 10:24 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Default Re: Re: Race classification

Quote:
Originally posted by LeftCoast
So was I, I only got 4 out of 16 correct - though the pictures you were working from were so small and at such low resolution that you really had very few clues to work on other than skin color, hair and gross facial features. That's my excuse anyway, whether I'd have done any better with 8x10's I don't know.
Click on the icons to blow the images up... even then, those were not trivial calls.
Principia is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 10:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 719
Default Re: Re: Race classification

Quote:
Originally posted by LeftCoast
So was I, I only got 4 out of 16 correct...
There were twenty total pictures. I happened to get seven right...though I think I failed to identify a single Hispanic properly and to me Asians can be almost interchangeable with American Indians from a visual identification perspective.
Lobstrosity is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 10:52 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
Default

Hmmm, 8 out of 20, but I suspect the small size of the pictures is deliberately misleading.

I'm mixed Anglo / Chinese but I've variously passed myself off as East European & Middle Eastern at times, although in general I find S.E. Asians are better at spotting my ethnicity.
echidna is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 01:24 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: الرياض
Posts: 6,456
Default

wow, this is a bunch of bullshit propoganda.

first they find 3 "african americans" who have white/black parents, mix in philipinos with asians (they also look like hispanics or blacks), then take the pictures, pixelize the FUCK out of them, discolor them (those were some HORRIBLE quality pictures, wtf was with the tonal qualities? some cheap POS disposable cam i bet), then make them 16 by 16 pixels

yeah...seems like a very scientific test thingy to me.
pariah is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 06:26 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by pariahSS
wow, this is a bunch of bullshit propoganda.

first they find 3 "african americans" who have white/black parents, mix in philipinos with asians (they also look like hispanics or blacks), then take the pictures, pixelize the FUCK out of them, discolor them (those were some HORRIBLE quality pictures, wtf was with the tonal qualities? some cheap POS disposable cam i bet), then make them 16 by 16 pixels

yeah...seems like a very scientific test thingy to me.
So I'm guessing you missed a few?

It wasn't scientific - that was the whole point. The article on the site talked about how visual indicators were used as a basis for race for the census prior to self-identification.

That area of the website, as a whole, dealt with the issue of defining race.

So many of my track and field buddies cannot distinguish between race and population group when discussing things like genetic speed.
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 11:03 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Raleigh, NC
Posts: 959
Talking

I didn't even get through 'sorting' them. Without knowing who their parents are, I wouldn't know whether to mark them as 'hispanic' or not (since you can't tell hispanic by looking at someone)

That, and I couldn't fit all 20 into the pile marked 'human' (of which there was none) because that's about how much 'race' matters to me.
lowmagnet is offline  
Old 07-16-2003, 11:20 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: So. Burlington, Vermont
Posts: 4,315
Default

I got... 5.
Two native amercans, one asian, one black, no hispanics, and one white.

Not suprised. Even if the pictures were higher quality, I wouldn't have been able to tell. The lines are so blurry...
Nostalgic Pushhead is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.