FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-09-2002, 04:15 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
Question Book or article needed. Ethics and god belief

Hi,

Does anyone know of a book, article, or anything that discusses ethics and/or morality and god belief witht he following condition.

I am looking for any literature where the author attempts to show that the idea that morality must come from an authority is not really morality or is at least a defective form of ethics.

Any recommendations? Is my question clear?

Thanks!

DC
Rusting Car Bumper is offline  
Old 10-09-2002, 04:58 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
Post

Look in to the <a href="http://www.apologeticspress.org" target="_blank">www.apologeticspress.org</a> for this stuff.

I bet C.S. Lewis has done it. probably to death.
Dark Jedi is offline  
Old 10-09-2002, 07:20 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
Post

"Ethics Without God," by Kai Nielsen, revised edition, Prometheus Books, 1990. Somewhat heavy reading, but an in-depth analysis of how and why an ethical system can exist independently of any supernatural entity.

Also, you should read the old standard "Why I Am Not a Christian," by Bertrand Russell, Touchstone Books, 1957. Great series of essays on religion, morals, etc. Basic required reading for any freethinker.
JerryM is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 06:48 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,587
Post

Anything from Nietzsche.
pug846 is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 08:52 AM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by JerryM:
<strong>"Ethics Without God," by Kai Nielsen, revised edition, Prometheus Books, 1990. Somewhat heavy reading, but an in-depth analysis of how and why an ethical system can exist independently of any supernatural entity.</strong>
I have the older edition. Its very thin compaed to the new edition.

As I recall he discusses how morality can be independent of god belief. However, this is not the same as what I was looking for. I was looking for a discussion that tries to show that a strict god based morality *is not* morality at all.

I don't recall that Nielsen does that. However, I read the book a long time ago so I could be wrong.

Quote:
Originally posted by JerryM:
<strong>Also, you should read the old standard "Why I Am Not a Christian," by Bertrand Russell, Touchstone Books, 1957. Great series of essays on religion, morals, etc. Basic required reading for any freethinker.</strong>
As I recall Mr Russel doesn't explain what I am needing either. If I am wrong please let me know.

DC

[ October 10, 2002: Message edited by: DigitalChicken ]</p>
Rusting Car Bumper is offline  
Old 10-10-2002, 12:01 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
Post

For DC:

There's a section in "Ethics" by William Frankena, Prentice-Hall, 4th ed, 1965 titled "Theological Voluntarism." This is Frankena's term for an ethical system based on the will of a deity. He discusses the logical problems with this type of ethical theory. As I recall, it's only about a page and a half discussion, but this might be closer to what you're looking for. I believe he goes into the Euthypro dilemma (is it wrong because that is God's will, or does God forbid it because it is wrong.) Russell does mention this very briefly in Why I Am Not a Christian. You might just try entering "theological voluntarism" in a search engine and see what comes up.

Happy hunting!
JerryM is offline  
Old 10-16-2002, 08:35 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 854
Post

Not withstanding what JerryM said to the contrary, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody saying that an ethical system of devine fiat isn't an ethical system.

While those of us with an empirical bent might be more swayed by an argument from evidence, an argument from authority is still one way of trying to sift things through...

That said, you might want to consider Peirce, C. S. (1966) Charles S. Peirce, Selected writings: Values in an universe of chance. He looks at the strengths and shortcomings of various forms of reasoning: naieve empiricism (called tenacity), argument from authority, a priori reasoning and rational empiricism. You might be able to generalize from that... I've not read it; it's a cite in my research methods text.
Psycho Economist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.