FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-2002, 04:52 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post Retroviruses Shows That Human-Specific Variety Developed When Humans, Chimps Diverged

Sorry, I haven't had much time for discussion lately, but I do try to keep up with the news so here's an interesting article:

<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/08/020802075138.htm" target="_blank">Retroviruses Shows That Human-Specific Variety Developed When Humans, Chimps Diverged</a>
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 08-02-2002, 05:38 AM   #2
DMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

That's a very interesting article, MrD. I just wish, however, that when people write this sort of thing up they would be a bit tighter with their language:
Quote:
retroviral elements may actually be implicated in the leap from chimpanzees to humans.
This suggests that we evolved from chimps instead of that we and chimps co-evolved from a common ancestor.
 
Old 08-02-2002, 05:56 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

I'm inclined to forgive them because earlier in the same article they say, "at the same time humans and chimps are believed to have diverged from a common ancestor" and "human-specific retroviruses emerged at the same time other researchers believe humans and chimps diverged".
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 08-02-2002, 06:31 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
Post

Very interesting. Thanks for the link.
Dr.GH is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 08:58 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by MrDarwin:
<strong>"Scientists in the past decade have discovered that remnants of ancient germ line infections called human endogenous retroviruses make up a substantial part of the human genome. Once thought to be merely "junk" DNA and inactive, many of these elements, in fact, perform functions in human cells."
</strong>
The creationists are gonna love this. "The evilutionists liars are wrong again! They claimed the appendix was useless and they were wrong! Now it's shown that they were wrong about Junk DNA having no fuction!"

Since they do have a fuction does this weaken the case from molecular genetics? "Can "errors" in modern species be used as evidence of "copying" from ancient ancestors? In fact, the answer to this question appears to be "yes," since recent molecular genetics investigations have uncovered some examples of the same "errors" present in the genetic material of humans and apes. To understand these findings it is necessary to know a little about DNA, the chemical molecule in which genetic information is stored." <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/" target="_blank">http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/</a> If they do, in fact, have a fuction, are they still errors?

[ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: tgamble ]

{edited to fix link - scigirl}

[ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: scigirl ]</p>
tgamble is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 09:42 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
Post

I have a question for one of you who knows more about this stuff than I do: Did these viruses come from inside the body, born from mutations of our own genes, or did they come from outside the body and incorporate themselves into the genes? Or both?
three4jump is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 09:52 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Post

Quote:
Did these viruses come from inside the body, born from mutations of our own genes, or did they come from outside the body and incorporate themselves into the genes?
The latter. Check out the section on endogenous retroviri in <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/" target="_blank">this article.</a>
ps418 is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:13 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
Post

thanks for the link.
three4jump is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 10:38 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
Post

I have been long impressed with <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/18/10254#Top" target="_blank">this Johnson&Coffin paper on EHRVs</a>.

I haven't yet taken the time to study this new idea of retroviruses promoting differentiation at taxa higher than bacteria. Lateral transfer in multicellular organisms? Big idea if it is real, but, homerun hitters also strike out at lot (other than Bonds that is).
Dr.GH is offline  
Old 08-04-2002, 01:16 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

Does anyone have any clue about the origin of viruses in general? Or are most viruses too stripped-down to give any clear clues about their origins?

And what I mean by origin is which non-virus ancestors that viruses are descended from.

[ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: lpetrich ]</p>
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.