FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2003, 07:51 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
Default The battle for American science

Here's an article for everyone's perusal on the anti-science conservatism present in American politics.

Blinn is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 07:48 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
Default

I found the writing style of the article to be a bit constipated. Nevertheless, it's sad to see that opponents of evolution find themselves forced to politicise their contentions through action in the judicial system rather than allow them to die a quick death in scientific circles.
Godot is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 09:57 AM   #3
RBH
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 15,407
Default

What I find unfortunate about the article is that it perpetuates a neocreo myth:
Quote:
Critics called this "stealth creationism" - religious dogma masquerading as science - but the ID proponents got their way, thanks partly to wording in President Bush's new education bill. Schools in Atlanta are now theoretically entitled to "teach the controversy" (though officials have urged teachers to stick to evolution for now, sparking a lawsuit) - and textbooks presenting Darwinism as fact have stickers inside, pointing out that it might not be. (Emphasis added)
That's a reference to the so-called Santorum Amendment, which was removed from the bill in Conference Committee and is not part of the law as finally passed and signed by Bush. It gets a couple of sentences worth of mention in the Conference Committee report, which has no legal standing except as it may inform a court's interpretation of the legislative intent of provisions of the law. However, since there is no provision in the law to which those Conference Committee sentences are pertinent, it can help interpret nothing and therefore is legally impotent.

RBH
RBH is offline  
Old 04-11-2003, 03:21 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western U.S.A.
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
rather than allow them to die a quick death in scientific circles.
But as you know, scientific circles are stacked with "naturalistic-bias" types who won't give them a fair shake. :boohoo:
gcameron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:37 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.