FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-02-2001, 07:33 AM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Far away from IIDB
Posts: 218
Question Are there any Buddhists or Taoists here?

If you are a Buddhist (of whatever stripe) or Taoist, then i'm interested in your opinion on this question:

How do you cope with reconciling your way of life with the apparently innate and ultimately endless desire of Man to improve himself?

To better explain my question, i'll offer my own dilemma. I am a Taoist and have come close to achieving what the Zen Buddhists call Zazen. However, i am held back from going any further by a restlessness best put into words by Tennyson in his poem "Ulysses". You can read this poem here, particularly lines 22-32 and 70.

This situation is somewhat analogous to that faced by Li Mu Bai in the film "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon", if you have seen it.

What i wish to learn, then, is if any of you have experienced a similar dilemma, and, regardless of your answer, what advice you can offer me.

Thank you.
telemachus is offline  
Old 08-02-2001, 08:32 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: rationalpagans.com
Posts: 7,400
Post

I don't have an answer for you, but I do like the question.
You have quoted one of my favorite poems---
51 Death closes all: but something ere the end,
52 Some work of noble note, may yet be done,
53 Not unbecoming men that strove with Gods.
made not afraid to get old.

I view it, I guess, much like a dinner buffet. We stay and eat, slowly or quickly, until we are full. We get full at different rates, and if you stay at the buffet you get hungry again.
Eventually, you may decide you are satiated, and leave. That may take a long time. And there is no rush.

My advice is not to sweat it. Same as you would give a nine year old who wants to be 20 now.

Not that I am a buddist...
Unsolicited advice. You get what you paid for.
jess is offline  
Old 08-03-2001, 01:13 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,796
Post

I am more a student of Buddhist philosophy than a practitioner so my answer may not be as personal as you would like, but I don't think there's any contradiction here.

Buddhism is about peace of mind not peace for the body. That is unattainable. You practice zazen to help you remain centered in dealing with the vissitudes of life. Look at the martial arts. They originated in Zen monasteries. Look also at the Zen arts of archery and swordsmanship. These are very active pursuits.

The important thing is to get your reward from what you are doing instead doing something in order to get a reward. If you have to clean toilets for a living, then dedicate yourself completely to the task of cleaning toilets.

The important thing is to remain centered and aware in your mind even if your body is beset by turmoil and pain. It is certainly better than the other way round.
boneyard bill is offline  
Old 08-04-2001, 07:21 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Far away from IIDB
Posts: 218
Question

Thanks for the thoughtful responses. It's a shame there aren't any Taoists or Buddhists so far who are willing to offer their thoughts.

boneyard bill wrote:
Quote:
The important thing is to remain centered and aware in your mind even if your body is beset by turmoil and pain.
I understand that. My point was and is that i am unable to reach final peace of mind as long as my passion for learning remains. Is there a contradiction here?
telemachus is offline  
Old 08-04-2001, 09:36 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Earth; Sol
Posts: 37
Post

"My point was and is that i am unable to reach final peace of mind as long as my passion for learning remains. Is there a contradiction here? "


Life is an accumulation of experience. From each experience, we grow and learn. As long as we live, we experience, grow, and learn. You need not have a passion for learning to actually learn. You will learn as long as you live. Accept that desire is not required to learn. Remember, elimination of desire is key. good luck.
Wargarden is offline  
Old 08-04-2001, 10:37 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Far away from IIDB
Posts: 218
Lightbulb

Wargarden wrote:
Quote:
Accept that desire is not required to learn. Remember, elimination of desire is key. good luck.
I see it now, clear as day. You've no idea how much you've helped me. Thanks alot.
telemachus is offline  
Old 08-04-2001, 11:23 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,796
Post

So it is intellectual pursuits that concern you, not adventure. That is trickier because it involves the mind.

Buddhism in not anti-intellectual, but it is anti-passion. You should be able to indulge your "passion" for learning so long as you maintain awareness.

If you maintain awareness you should be able to realize that the "self" that is so passionate for learning is not your true nature but a construct from your karma. There isn't you and learning process going on. There is just a learning process that is inseparable from that other process that we call "self."
boneyard bill is offline  
Old 08-05-2001, 04:56 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Far away from IIDB
Posts: 218
Post

Yes, it's intellectual pursuits that i am concerned about. I'm a Taoist but i think the same principle applies; i'm trying to understand the Tao and i need to achieve balance. I have done so everywhere except intellectually, where i find i can't sit still, so to speak. Herein lies my problem.

However, i think i realize now what i was missing. I can learn more through wu-wei than otherwise, and hence my striving is counter-productive.

Thank you all for helping me attain this wisdom.
telemachus is offline  
Old 08-06-2001, 05:03 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sundsvall, Sweden
Posts: 3,159
Question

Wargarden wrote: Remember, elimination of desire is key.

I thought it was attachment, not desire, that is supposed to be eliminated.
Eudaimonist is offline  
Old 08-07-2001, 01:19 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Earth; Sol
Posts: 37
Post

"I thought it was attachment, not desire, that is supposed to be eliminated."

I've always understood it to be elimination of desire. And isn't attachment merely a desire or want to hold on? Check out this page. It directly answers this conundrum. http://www.nandawon.demon.co.uk/vihara/intro03.htm

[ August 07, 2001: Message edited by: Wargarden ]
Wargarden is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.