FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2002, 09:43 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Question First Cause question for theists

I often see the existence of the universe given as evidence for the existence of God. The argument goes "Everything must have a cause. God is the First Cause of the universe."

I'll accept "The universe must have a cause" for the sake of this argument. Here's my question:

Why one god? Is the First Cause argument evidence that just one god created the universe? Wouldn't multiple gods make just as much sense?

Here's a second question. Many (not all) theists assume that the creator god suggested by First Cause is benevolent. How is the First Cause argument evidence for a benevolent god? Couldn't the creator just as easily be evil or indifferent? The last seems the most likely to me - a god who created the universe and is watching it happen, like a scientists watches an experiment he designed.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 10:13 AM   #2
HRG
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave:
<strong>I often see the existence of the universe given as evidence for the existence of God. The argument goes "Everything must have a cause. God is the First Cause of the universe."

I'll accept "The universe must have a cause" for the sake of this argument. Here's my question:

Why one god? Is the First Cause argument evidence that just one god created the universe? Wouldn't multiple gods make just as much sense?

</strong>
Or a creator of the universe who is caused himself .....

HRG.
HRG is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 11:02 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Exclamation

I started a thread a while back on just this subject:

<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=50&t=000005&p=7" target="_blank">First Cause Cannot Prove God</a>

Denizens of the E/C forum might want to check it out to see the roots of the Great (or Not-So-Great) Ed Menace. Otherwise, I wouldn't recommend it; it's not a very interesting argument when Ed is involved.
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 02:32 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 165
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave:
<strong>Couldn't the creator just as easily be evil or indifferent?</strong>
I don't know who this 'evil' is you speek of... but yes, It was easy to create the universe. And the correct speeling of my name is indifference. I think I will send you to hell for that.
Indifference is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 02:59 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Thumbs up

BTW, I'd like to add that this is a great post. The points it makes are excellent, and I hope we get some serious theistic replies.

[ April 25, 2002: Message edited by: Rimstalker ]</p>
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 03:07 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 165
Post

sorry...
Indifference is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 03:12 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave:
<strong>I often see the existence of the universe given as evidence for the existence of God. The argument goes "Everything must have a cause. God is the First Cause of the universe."
</strong>
I prefer the sylogism:

P1: Everything that exists must have a cause.
P2: God, (arguably) by definition, does not have a cause.
c: Therefore, no God can exist.

m.
Undercurrent is offline  
Old 04-26-2002, 07:06 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Smile

Quote:
sorry...
No, no, Indifference! I wasn't scolding you! My comment was a subtle, esoteric reference to Ed's "arguments" ont he subject, which I do not consider "serious."
GunnerJ is offline  
Old 04-26-2002, 07:06 AM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

Hmm, no theist replies yet. Thanks for the compliment, Rimstalker.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 04-29-2002, 05:37 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Question

No takers?
Godless Dave is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.