FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-03-2003, 10:19 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Default I miss the creationists sooo badly

That I decided to play one. However, I'm terrible at coming up with my own lame-ass arguments (i cry when I try), and the ones from WinAce's site seriously make me want to kill myself, so:

I'm asking people use this thread to post a general argument that they have heard. I will then start a topic on it, and argue it to the DEATH, being as creationist as I can. This really needs to be done, so that way all the lurkers get a chance to read the stuff over again (or the first time, if they are relatively new here).

Any first suggestions?

I've come up with one I intend to use--I'll be "researching" over at chick.com and drdino.com for this one.
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
Old 04-03-2003, 10:24 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

Try your hand at Kinds

The challenge to creationists: Define the holobaramin that the animals in the above thread belong to, and explain how the one couple has become multiple different species with indivisual adaptations to different environments, without admitting speciation or beneficial mutations.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 04-04-2003, 04:20 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
Default Re: I miss the creationists sooo badly

Quote:
Originally posted by Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ
That I decided to play one. However, I'm terrible at coming up with my own lame-ass arguments (i cry when I try), and the ones from WinAce's site seriously make me want to kill myself, so:

I'm asking people use this thread to post a general argument that they have heard. I will then start a topic on it, and argue it to the DEATH, being as creationist as I can. This really needs to be done, so that way all the lurkers get a chance to read the stuff over again (or the first time, if they are relatively new here).

Any first suggestions?

I've come up with one I intend to use--I'll be "researching" over at chick.com and drdino.com for this one.
You might also try this site:

http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/

luck and have fun!

doov
Duvenoy is offline  
Old 04-04-2003, 11:20 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albucrazy, New Mexico
Posts: 1,425
Default

I really would like to see some debate on radiometric dating.

I'm not all that familiar with the arguments and thier counters, so that would be informative.
WWSD is offline  
Old 04-04-2003, 12:01 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California
Posts: 359
Default

One subject I have found that makes young Earth creationists change the subject, condemn me to hell, or suddenly discover pressing business that prevents them from responding, is stratigraphy. Geological unconformities are something that just cant be fitted into flood geology.
Gracchus is offline  
Old 04-04-2003, 12:05 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albucrazy, New Mexico
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gracchus
One subject I have found that makes young Earth creationists change the subject, condemn me to hell, or suddenly discover pressing business that prevents them from responding, is stratigraphy. Geological unconformities are something that just cant be fitted into flood geology.

No way, polystrate trees completely disprove your stratigraphy theory you evil evilutionist.
WWSD is offline  
Old 04-04-2003, 02:03 PM   #7
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Quote:
I really would like to see some debate on radiometric dating.
You dont know that that carbon always dekayed that same speed and besides the vapor canopy protected the earth from cosmic rays back in Noahs time and the Scientists at Answers in Genesis already dated lava rocks from mount st Helens at 47 billion yrs old so that prooves the earth is only 6007 yrs old and Ill pray for you so you dont burn forever and ever in hell you athiest darwin worshiper.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 12:30 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albucrazy, New Mexico
Posts: 1,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps
You dont know that that carbon always dekayed that same speed and besides the vapor canopy protected the earth from cosmic rays back in Noahs time and the Scientists at Answers in Genesis already dated lava rocks from mount st Helens at 47 billion yrs old so that prooves the earth is only 6007 yrs old and Ill pray for you so you dont burn forever and ever in hell you athiest darwin worshiper.

Well, in that case, I suppose I had better rethink my position on the earth's age. Praise Jesus you came along and set me straight!!
WWSD is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 03:40 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by WWSD
No way, polystrate trees completely disprove your stratigraphy theory you evil evilutionist.
You know what kills me with that? This global flood was supposed to lay down every bit of sedimentary rock and move hundreds of feet of soil around. So in realistic theory, entire forests were buried.

So they find one damn polystratic tree (if even that), and I ask, were's the rest of the fucking forest?
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 04-05-2003, 04:20 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Higgins

So they find one damn polystratic tree (if even that), and I ask, were's the rest of the fucking forest?
God made them disappear to test our faith, just like He destroyed all traces of the other people who lived at the same time as Noah. They were so Evil that thei bones had to be destroyed. Therefore there are no human fossils next to dinosaurs!
Advocatus Diaboli is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.