FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-21-2002, 06:07 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
Post I am requesting some info about agnosticism

For class, I need to know why people are agnostics. My teacher wants to know why people believe that we can never know if God is real. His argument is: What if God came down and talked to us? Wouldnt that be a way to know he is real? What if he worked a full-fledged miracle and everyone witnessed it? that would be another way we can know if God is real. So, I guess the main thing I need to know is why you believe we can never know if there is a God or not. Thank you.
Half-Life is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 06:10 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Post

Because God never seems to do those things...if he did then Agnostics would be theists
Viti is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 06:15 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,735
Post

Mainly because there is no "rock-hard" evidence of the existence of any god(s). Some hold that they simply do not know if a god exists, since none of the so-called "works" of any god are proven or explained. Others (I believe atheist agnostics) hold that they "cannot" know if a god or gods exist, simply that it is not possible to know if such a god exists since we have not found anything thus far to prove either way, and if a god did exist, the god would therefore want us to not have reason to "know" that he/she/it existed and therefore made it impossible for us to know.
Samhain is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 06:24 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Post

I don't think agnostics hold that it is impossible to ever know, only that it is impossible to make a determination based on current evidence and knowledge. Your teacher's argument assumes a change in this circumstance so it's not valid from what I can see.

It's like saying "What if we find a fully intact sasquatch corpse tommorrow...would you still say it is not possible to know if Bigfoot exists?" It's just silly
Viti is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 06:39 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea:
<strong>Because God never seems to do those things...if he did then Agnostics would be theists</strong>

But, agnostics shouldnt say that we can never know because IF God ever did those things, that would be a way to know. So, it isnt impossible.
Half-Life is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 06:56 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Post

Half-Life, agnosticism means "I don't know", not
"I can't know".
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 08:03 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: California
Posts: 118
Post

Half-Life,

I think you need to be clear about your definition of agnostic.

The definition I prefer is the one originally invented by Thomas Henry Huxley.

He explains it this way from this website<a href="http://www.agnostichurch.com/huxagfaith.html" target="_blank">Agnostic Church</a>)

Quote:
Agnosticism, in fact, is not a creed, but a method, the essence of which lies in the rigorous application of a single principle. That principle is of great antiquity; it is as old as Socrates; as old as the writer who said, 'Try all things, hold fast by that which is good;' it is the foundation of the Reformation, which simply illustrated the axiom that every man should be able to give a reason for the faith that is in him; it is the great principle of Descartes; it is the fundamental axiom of modern Science. Positively the principle may be expressed: In matters of the intellect, follow your reason as far as it will take you, without regard to any other consideration, And negatively: In matters of the intellect, do not pretend that conclusions are certain which are not demonstrated or demonstrable.
I believe it is this last sentence that leads to the normal understanding of agnosticism. When faced with a lack of convicing evidence the agnostic would simply acknowledge that he doesn't know.

Steve

edited for spelling

[ April 21, 2002: Message edited by: SteveD ]</p>
SteveD is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 11:04 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Half-Life:
<strong>For class, I need to know why people are agnostics. </strong>
So you have something to do for homework.

Quote:
<strong>Thank you.</strong>
You're welcome.
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 04-22-2002, 12:04 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,735
Post

A few excerpts I have on agnosticism...

Quote:
Taken from the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy:

Agnosticism - The view that some proposition is not known, and perhaps cannot be known to be true or false. The term is particularly applied to theological doctrines.
Quote:
Taken from George H. Smith's Atheism: the Case Against God:

Agnosticism can either be theistic or atheistic.

The agnostic theist believes that in the existence of god but maintains that the nature of that god is unknowable...According to the religious agnostic, we can state that god is, but-due to the unknowable nature of the supernatural-we cannot state what god is.

Like his theistic cousin, the agnostic atheist maintains that any supernatural realm is inherently unknowable by the human mind, but the agnostic suspends his judgement one step further back. For the agnostic atheist, not only is the nature of any supernatural being unknowable, but the existence of any supernatural being is unknowable as well. We cannot have knowledge of the unknowable; therefore, concludes this agnostic, we cannot have knowledge of god's existence...

...Thus, for the agnostic atheist, the proper answer to the question, "Does a god exist?" is "I don't know" - or, more specifically - "I cannot know."
Just a little food for thought.
Samhain is offline  
Old 04-22-2002, 02:35 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A place in the Northern Hemisphere of Planet Earth
Posts: 1,250
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Samhain:
<strong>
For the agnostic atheist, not only is the nature of any supernatural being unknowable, but the existence of any supernatural being is unknowable as well. We cannot have knowledge of the unknowable; therefore, concludes this agnostic, we cannot have knowledge of god's existence...

</strong>
OK, now, why can't we have knowledge of the supernatural? How does an agnostic know that God is actually supernatural? What if God is natural? Just a little food for thought.
Half-Life is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.