FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2003, 05:29 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 169
Talking Creationist Thermodynamics

Most of us have probably heard the thermodynamics argument against evolution. It usually consists of extending the second law of thermodynamics to include open systems.

Whenever I try to explain how the second law of thermodynamics works and how the earth is an open system, it never gets through to them. So, to illustrate my point, I have decided to compile a list of how the same argument can be used against everyday, commonly observed occurrences. I will keep it on my site for future use.

I’ll start by mentioning something that grows more complex over time, and then an explanation of why it could never happen that includes the phrase “evil secular scientists”, “the bible says”, “atheist cover-up”, or something similar. Then, someone else will add another item to the list and on and on.

Here we go!

Tree growth – Trees could not go from being a small seed to a large, complex tree in only years like the evil secular scientist say. The laws of thermodynamics state that entropy may not increase! This “tree growth” is nothing more then an atheist cover-up of the truth of the gospels!

__________________
I am a cat eating tree
Slavik91 is offline  
Old 04-20-2003, 08:13 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
Default

If I'm not mistaken, creationists have coined their own "generalized 2nd law of thermodynamics", and they're using that. This is very common feautre of creationist "science"... when the mainstream disagrees with them, they make up a word that sounds all scientificy ("polystrate fossils", "hydrological sorting", whatever) and then hammer it over the heads of believers until no brain cell is left unmashed. Disgusting.
Jayjay is offline  
Old 04-21-2003, 07:29 AM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jayjay
This is very common feautre of creationist "science"... when the mainstream disagrees with them, they make up a word that sounds all scientificy ("polystrate fossils", "hydrological sorting", whatever) and then hammer it over the heads of believers until no brain cell is left unmashed. Disgusting.
more examples:
Baramins
Irreducible Complexity
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 04-21-2003, 08:11 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 6,980
Default

Things that the creationists second law prevents:

Breathing
Growing
Dying
Living
Orbiting planets
Eating
God
The Resurrection
Sex
Birth
Conception
The Color Blue
Ultraviolet rays
X-rays
Radioactive decay
The color Red
Communism
Democracy
Theocracy
Monarcy
Oligarchy
Socialism
Doonsebury
President Bush
President Clinton
Elections
Dogs
Cats
Bears
The letter p
The letter z
The letter q
The letter y
Why



And this is the short list.
Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.