FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-08-2003, 11:40 AM   #381
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Whatever you say,liar.

STILL no evidence has been presented nevermind all 6 instances you lied (like the good Christian man you claim to be) about having.
But instead we have more weasel words and baby games.

I was actually feeling bad for you yesterday and had almost decided to let up on you,but your ongoing behaviour has changed my mind and you deserve everything you've gotten as well as whats yet to come.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 12:13 PM   #382
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
Talking

So, Radorth, how exactly does dividing the number of views by the number of posts give any sort of meaningful number as to how many people are reading this thread? All your math says is that for every 1 post there are 10 views. I mean I've seen stupid things come out of your mouth before but I don't know how you could have deluded yourself into thinking that dividing views by posts could mean much of anything. Do you think the people who post on this thread view the thread 9 times before deciding to post? I think we tend to reply at least once in every three views. That would leave 7 extra views per poster that must go to non-participants. Which still doesn't mean jack.

Of course, you'd still be wrong even if it was true that there were only 15 people reading this thread, as earlier you were proclaiming how you had created one of the most popular threads on II! You were so proud...Of course now we see that you just make things up to suit yourself...when you like the idea of having a popular thread, you proclaim that it's popular...when you are ashamed of your behavior and don't want the thread to be popular, suddenly it isn't. Of course, we all knew about your propensity for lying and inventing things before this but it's just yet another nail in the coffin.

-B
Bumble Bee Tuna is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 04:23 PM   #383
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
Default Jesus' imput?

Quote:
Originally posted by Bumble Bee Tuna
I don't know, if Jesus is allegedly imputing Radorth with righteousness, he's really doing a piss-poor job.
1. Did Jesus exist? Was there ever a human bloke named Jesus who walked on water and hung around with 12 unemployed wankers?

2. IF Jesus existed, is there any evidence that he survived his death, and imputs nutters in the 21st century?

3. If Jesus died for 37 hours in 29 CE, his brain cells underwent apoptosis, with his brain beginning to turn to mush. If he is still around both in his human and god form, the human form is working with a brain, once, mostly mush, now mostly scar tissue. I doubt if he can more than vegetate if that.

4. If the god-half of Jesus is still lurking out in the Magic Universe, what is to say that he can cross into the real universe. Also there are many other gods in the Magic Universe (Dagda, Lugh, Danu, Wodin, Thor, Loki, Baal, Ahura Mazda, Mithra, etc.) Maybe Mithra will demand that Jesus return the characteristics and myths that he stole from Mithra.

Fiach
Fiach is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 04:44 PM   #384
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Superior, CO USA
Posts: 1,553
Default

Actually, in most threads this length it boils quickly down to a few users. There are far more people on this thread than most.

The simple fact is that you never had a list. The only person who needs to participate in Radoth's poll is Fenton, and he has repeatedly asked to see it.

Like God, however, it doesn't exist and never did, did it Radoth?
Family Man is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 08:58 PM   #385
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

And if I posted it in the next ten minutes, wth thread sources, you would do what?

Invent another cynical theory?

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 09:10 PM   #386
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

Let's hear your estimate then BBT, or do you dare? My estimate will come out much closer, if we are talking about readers who tune in say two or three times a day, besides posters. And it is quite obvious the thread was as popular in relation to others as any lately. It doesn't mean it has some arbitrary quantity of readers. You're just witch-hunting, hoping to make the club. Unfortunately you occasionally post something related to the thread.

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 09:23 PM   #387
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
And if I posted it in the next ten minutes, wth thread sources, you would do what?
Rad has had longer than 10 minutes to post; he's had still longer to post something, ANYTHING on this thread that isn't insulting and/or irrational and/or off-topic...

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 09:34 PM   #388
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
Default

Nice tap dance around the question.

Which shows why I decided not to publish it.

Rad
Radorth is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 10:26 PM   #389
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
Nice tap dance around the question.

Which shows why I decided not to publish it.

Rad
Radorth is the only one who benefits from posting this alleged list and not only would it help prove he's not a liar,but it would also prove me to be wrong. Theres no way he could lose and 6 misquotes would leave little room for doubt in anyones head.
There are only three rational reasons a person in his position wouldn't "publish" it:

1.)There is no list.

2.)He`s insane.

3.)There is a list and Radorth feels that the the evidence it contains will destroy me and take away my will to live. Radorth,being the gentle True Christian that he is has decided to have mercy on me.

I'm quite sure that it's not #3.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 03-08-2003, 10:59 PM   #390
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
Default Jack

Quote:
Originally posted by Jack the Bodiless
As an atheist, I am pretty much without sin.
As an Atheist, I don't even have a concept of sin. I only know what helps and what harms. Christians sins do not necessarily coincide with right and wrong. Killing babies in the Old Testament was NOT a sin. For Atheists is it terribly wrong, an atrocity.

Sin is an arbitrary act, forbidden by their hypothetical God and having nothing to do with any rational or absolute morality. It is purely arbitrary based on the mood of God at the moment. Sin is arbitrary. And since God can't talk (doesn't exist) God's arbitrary designation of what is sin is made by his spokesmen (prophets, shamans, priests). And we have only the word of these self-proclaimed spokesmen for God. It is so arbitrary and relativistic it amazes me that they say we atheists are morally relativistic. What is beneficial or harmful certainly can change with time so there is no absolute morality.

Fiach
Fiach is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.