FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2002, 04:18 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post Creationists and Raelians?

URL: <a href="http://www.rael.org" target="_blank">http://www.rael.org</a>

The Raelians believe in Intelligent Design -- by extraterrestrial visitors who are fellow inhabitants of our Universe. They thus make a good counterexample to the creationist presumption that there are only two possible theories of origins: theirs and evolution. Yes, some of them maintain that the theories of non-Abrahamic religions are all evolution.

In fact, many of the deficiencies usually attributed to natural selection could be a result of the visitors' limited powers and fallibility.

But natural selection has been observed and extraterrestrial visitors have not; also, the multiple different "design solutions" often observed suggest a curious lack of communication between design teams. For example, bird, bat, and pterodactyl wings are all modified front limbs, and each sort of wing has remarkably similar anatomy: bird wings are very much alike, bat wings are very much alike, and pterodactyl wings are all alike. But they are all very different from each other.

But such a lack of communication is a natural result of natural selection; also, in this example, when a wing design has been invented, it is too difficult to make drastic changes without seriously affecting its performance.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 01-28-2002, 04:49 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich:

<strong>In fact, many of the deficiencies usually attributed to natural selection could be a result of the visitors' limited powers and fallibility.
</strong>
So these aliens have the technology to cross the incredible vastness of space, yet thought that the human post-auricular muscle, trachea/oesophagus junction, appendix and coccyx were good ideas? Bedbug mating -- a random stab through the carapace -- and the skulls of bony flatfish are the best they could come up with? Tell me again about the level of fallibility that lets the recurrent laryngeal design slip through?

From the website:

Quote:
<strong>The messages dictated to Rael explain how life on Earth is not the result of random evolution, nor the work of a supernatural 'God'. It is a deliberate creation, using DNA, by a scientifically advanced people </strong>
Just how limited are the powers of these DNA engineers that they put in so many pseudogenes and the Alu sequences? Maybe the authors of the <a href="http://www.rael.org/int/english/evidence/evidence.html" target="_blank">Science page</a> could explain why 40% of the fruitfly genome is taken up with so much satellite DNA, a total of 18.2 million repeats of three tiny, useless sequences...

It’s a case of SSDW: same shit, different website. As with creationists, these IDiots rely on our ignorance to get away with their twaddle.

Education: the deadly weapon against snake-oil salesmen.

TTFN, Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 01-28-2002, 07:31 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 254
Post

To be fair to lpetrich, I'm sure his intention in posting this was not to lend credence to the Raelian's point of view, but rather to show creationists an obvious example of the failure of bifurcation.

lpetrich, this would probably be of much more benefit on a Creationist forum, just to show them that it isn't neccessarily either/or.

Well, I guess in some sense, it IS either/or, because where did the Alien's come from, but I digress

(edited because I cannot write a coherent sentence today]

[ January 28, 2002: Message edited by: BLoggins02 ]

[ January 28, 2002: Message edited by: BLoggins02 ]</p>
BLoggins02 is offline  
Old 01-29-2002, 12:46 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Post

That's part of my purpose: to show that there are more alternatives that scriptural-percussionist creationism, and that establishing intelligent design would not automatically support their views.

And yes, I agree that there are lots of design blunders and oddities that would not be reasonably expected of those capable of traversing interstellar space.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.