FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2003, 08:05 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
Default Faith-based failure

This editorial describes a program called the Inner Change Freedom Initiative. This is a "biblically based" and "Christ centered" program where volunteering prisoners that supports prisoners through a "spiritual and moral transformation".

To test the effectiveness of the program, the participants were matched with a control group of similar prisoners who did not participate. This introduces the problem that the control group, not being volunteers, might have been less eager to be rehabilitated, but the control group was chosen with the goal of being similar in nature to the group that actually volunteered, as opposed to just a random sample of prisoners.

Anyway, here's the result from http://www.crrucs.org/8_research_pdf...ge_freedom.pdf
(page 5)

Quote:
(4.) Considering all participants, including those inmates who did and did not complete all phases of the program, 36.2% of IFI participants were arrested compared to 35% of the matched group during the two-year tracking period. Among the total number of IFI participants, 24.3% were incarcerated compared to 20.3% of the comparison group during the two-year post-release period.
The same report mentions (page 7),

Quote:
It should be noted, however, that the amount of recidivism reduction for those in secular programs when compared to prisoners not receiving the program, tends to be rather small (e.g., 5%-10%)
But of course, this is better than the IFI's score. The report justifies this by arguing that what is really important is that the graduates of IFI did better than the non-participants. The report recognizes that this means that the program could be simply selecting people less likely to re-offend. The program actually requires that people get a job after release in order to "graduate". But the report argues that because the difference between graduates and non-participants holds up over time, the selection bias can be discounted.

But if the program was really having a substantial effect (like the 5-10% figure for secular programs), then the participants would tend to do better than the non-participants.
sodium is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 08:30 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 895
Default

http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...threadid=59712
enrious is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.