FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2003, 02:18 PM   #1
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Default If Jesus was God's ONLY son . . .

. . . what about his Sisters?

Are there tales in the discarded books of the bible about divine female siblings?

It's always "Son o' God" this, and "Son o' God" that. Were the Sisters off doing more important things?

cheers,
Michael
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 02:43 PM   #2
DMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It was a patriarchal society. Fathers and sons mattered more than mere females.
 
Old 08-07-2003, 04:39 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: If Jesus was God's ONLY son . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by The Other Michael
. . . what about his Sisters?

Are there tales in the discarded books of the bible about divine female siblings?

It's always "Son o' God" this, and "Son o' God" that. Were the Sisters off doing more important things?

cheers,
Michael
Son doesn't mean literal biological Son, it refers to Jesus being the only person that is both human and God. Humans are the children of God, so Jesus is called the Son of God, since He is human and divine.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 06:45 PM   #4
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Default

Hi DMB,

Yes, I know there was probably a conspiracy to hide the diefic activities of any Goddess(es) (probably because they were doing a better job than that layabout Yahweh, who seems to have been a pretty haphazard workBeing). I was more wondering if there was something in the Apochrypha or similar non-canonical writings about there being some fellow God-sibs of the feminine persuasion.

Hi Magus55,

Seems to me that they could just refer to him as the The Only Begotton Child of God and made things a lot clearer.

I'd think that the Jesus avatar of the godhead would really only qualify as a demigod, as he lacked (by a huge margin) full godly powers.

So would a younger Sister have been underfoot making rude noises during the parables, or an older Sister have been constantly harping at him about all the wood shavings he kept tracking into the house?

cheers,
Michael
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 06:49 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Other Michael
Hi DMB,

Yes, I know there was probably a conspiracy to hide the diefic activities of any Goddess(es) (probably because they were doing a better job than that layabout Yahweh, who seems to have been a pretty haphazard workBeing). I was more wondering if there was something in the Apochrypha or similar non-canonical writings about there being some fellow God-sibs of the feminine persuasion.

Hi Magus55,

Seems to me that they could just refer to him as the The Only Begotton Child of God and made things a lot clearer.

I'd think that the Jesus avatar of the godhead would really only qualify as a demigod, as he lacked (by a huge margin) full godly powers.

So would a younger Sister have been underfoot making rude noises during the parables, or an older Sister have been constantly harping at him about all the wood shavings he kept tracking into the house?

cheers,
Michael
I don't see what this thread is all about. Assuming Jesus did have brothers AND sisters, I suppose that is part of what this semi-God's mission on Earth was--------to feel the human condition---including bratty little sisters.

I kind of like the idea. Nothing would bring a demi-God down to Earth more than having bratty little sisters around.

More important question though is--------Why would any God subject Himself to such nonsense? That is part of the allure of Jesus to the common man--that He would subject Himself to such things just to share our feelings.
Rational BAC is offline  
Old 08-07-2003, 07:08 PM   #6
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Default

Hi Rational BAC,

I don't see what this thread is all about.

Sometimes I work in mysterious ways.

Mind you, I'm not questioning about whether Mary and Joseph had other kids (I guess they'd just be fraternal godlings at best, always being shown up by their inability to levitate or generate a halo). I'm saying that things are kind of murky in the Bible about the presence of female sibling dieties. The door seems open for Jesus-phine to have been off in the wilds of South America (possibly at a different time), doing her best to encourage the locals to rip her heart from her chest in the ever-popular bloody demigod sacrifice.

cheers,
Michael
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 01:16 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default Just face it

[QUOTE]It's always "Son o' God" this, and "Son o' God" that. QUOTE]

God is gay.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 05:06 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: PROC
Posts: 206
Default

Christ being an only son would make God the perfect model for China's One-Child Policy.
Kenneth is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 05:37 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

"Mao" is only TWO LETTERS away from "god!"

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 07:41 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Albion, CA
Posts: 15
Angry

Hey, Mark9950, it's NOT always Son-of-God this and Son-of-God that...Lotsa times it's Son of Man. You know...Manson.
Kandeda Trefil is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.