FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-2006, 03:40 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default Yeshu story a combo of Greek, Egyptian, and Roman myths merged -where is the evidence

Split from this thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben C Smith
But if Jesus had 12 disciples then he had to have 5, right?

Ben.
The Jesus myth combines the story of Yeshu with other Greek, Egyptian, and Roman mythical figures.

When Jesus was contructed in Greece he was given 12 disciples to represent the 12 signs of the Zodiac.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-14-2006, 03:46 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
When Jesus was contructed in Greece he was given 12 disciples to represent the 12 signs of the Zodiac.
I don't think so. I would assume it would reflect the 12 tribes of Israel/12 brothers of Joseph more so than the Greek zodiac. Storywise, I dunno, maybe, but the parallels are very incomplete.

JtB - Aquarius
Mary - Virgo
Satan - Leo
Thomas - Gemini
Jesus - Pisces?

(btw - these two posts need to be split)
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 01-14-2006, 04:39 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default



4th cenruty Jewish synagogue showing the roman god Helios surrounded by teh 12 signs of the zodiac.

The Jesus myth was a combination of the cult Egyptian cult of Horus, the man-god born of a virgin, the Greeco-Roman god Helios, the Jewish Yeshu, and the Persian mythical prohpet Zoroaster.

All of these religions overlaped in the region of Palestine from the time of around 200 BC to 500 AD, swirling together to create the Jesus myth.

After Alexander the Great conquered Persia and Egypt, the Greeks took over the area of Egypt and Palestine, as well as parts of Perisa, and the Greeks, merged these religions in Alexandria and Palestine, with Platonic ideas of the Logos and opposition to the material world champtioned by Plato.

What we call Christianity today was constructed by the Greeks and Greek speaking Jews mostly in Alexandria and Athens, based on Greek speaking Jewish mythology that emerged from the mix of the afore mentioned religions from the region of Palestine.

Jesus is Helios+Horus+Yeshu+Zoroaster

Of these the only one that MIGHT actually be real is Yeshu.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-14-2006, 05:00 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151


4th cenruty Jewish synagogue showing the roman god Helios surrounded by teh 12 signs of the zodiac.
You give me a fourth century Jewish synagogue as a rebuttal for a 1st century idea? Have anything closer to the time period we're talking about. Or perhaps a source for the "200 BC to 500 AD" claim?

Quote:
The Jesus myth was a combination of the cult Egyptian cult of Horus, the man-god born of a virgin, the Greeco-Roman god Helios, the Jewish Yeshu, and the Persian mythical prohpet Zoroaster.
However, my claim was about the origin of his disciples, not Jesus himself. The Jesus story has obvious OT parallels, especially Joseph. Why would we not assume the easiest direction of information flow?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 04:35 AM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
Split from this thread



The Jesus myth combines the story of Yeshu with other Greek, Egyptian, and Roman mythical figures.

When Jesus was contructed in Greece he was given 12 disciples to represent the 12 signs of the Zodiac.
I would agree with Chris. In addition, you haven't told us WHERE this synagogue is. Date of construction and location. The idea that Jesus was constructed from older redeemer myths was a popular up to about 50 years ago, and of course, Doherty's version is just a variation on this theme, however, most scholars having regard to the titles given to Jesus in the gospels, "son of god", "kyrios", "Messiah" regard them as having their source within mainstream Judaism. Son of God in particular formed the basis of the early church's developing understanding of the historical Jesus.

I would recommend Geza Vermes "Jesus the Jew", or "Changing Faces of Jesus" for a more sober and scholarly treatment.
mikem is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 05:08 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

The image I linked was just an example that I could find handy on the internet, its not meant to represent the totality of evidence by any means.

The fact is, however, that Jews lived all over the Mediterranian and Mesopotamia. Jews lives in the Egyptian city of Alexandria, they lived among the Babylonians, they lived throughout Palestine, they lived in Greece, they lived in Rome. These Jews all traveled among each other, spread ideas, etc.

The Jews were also heavily Hellenized and influenced by Platonic ideas.

So, that all of these ideas become integrated by Jews and thus the "full story" of Jesus came from Jews is no strange thing.

However, it is clear that many of the concepts of Christianity developed among the Greek Gentiles during the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th century as well.

Yes, the Jesus myth came from teh Jews, as they were the ones that integrated the ideas of all of these different religions. Palestine is right there at the nexus between Egypt, Persia, and Greece, where all of these ideas overlapped.

The Christian mythology of Satan, Heaven and Hell, the fall from grace of Satan andthe war between God and Satan, and the Day of Final Judgement are all very plainly taken from Zoroastrianism. Jews just integrated parts of their existing mythology with the Zoroastrian mythology.

The image of the synagogue, if nothing else, is an example of how Jews in the region integrated a variety of religious traditions. The image of a man with rays coming out of his head definately preceeds Jesus, and was most commonly associated with Helios. The story of Helios also invovles being killed and then ressurected 3 days later, hence the reason that Sol Viticus is 3 days after the winter solestice, which was then transformed into Christmas.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 05:34 AM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151
The fact is, however, that Jews lived all over the Mediterranian and Mesopotamia. Jews lives in the Egyptian city of Alexandria, they lived among the Babylonians, they lived throughout Palestine, they lived in Greece, they lived in Rome. These Jews all traveled among each other, spread ideas, etc.

The Jews were also heavily Hellenized and influenced by Platonic ideas.
Jews may well have been subject to cultural influence, however the level of religious and philosophical influence would have varied depending upon time and place. A 4th century synagogue is not a reliable indicator of Jewish beliefs in 1st century Palestine.

Some Jews may well have been influenced by Hellenism and "Platonic ideas". Which Platonic ideas did you have in mind? There is a difference between platonizing influence, and specific ideas, like those that Doherty assumes Paul to have adopted from Middle Platonism. The fact is that what some may call Platonic ideas were not solely Platonic, but fairly universal. That Jews had beliefs that were shared by other religions says nothing about the relationships of influence between them.

There was no doubt that Christianity was influenced by the surrounding culture, again the question is to what extent? To say that 3rd and 4th century Xtian theology was a synthesis based on it's Jewish roots and the need to explain itself to a predominantly non Jewish audience falls far short of proving that Jesus was a mythical being!

You have not provided a shred of proof that Jesus was a combination of Horus, Helios and Zoroaster.
mikem is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 06:20 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
Default

There definitly were parrallels between pagan myth and Christian myth, and the influence deffinitly was from pagan to Christian. The only problem is, there's so much bunk and non-sense floating around out there you have to be careful of posuers and psuedo-scholars like Archay S. I did a little research on this, and found a good number of parrallels supported by primary sources.

The Greek god Perseus, born of the virgin Danae and Zeus in a shower of gold:

Perseus, the son of Jove [Zeus] and her whom, in her prison, Juppiter’s [Zeus’] golden shower made fertile. — Metamorphoses 4.697

The Greek god Heracles (known to you under his Roman name, Hercules), who died in agony, was resurrected, and ascended to heaven:

Heracles, whom she had by Zeus…the poison of the hydra began to corrode his skin…and [he] tore off the tunic, which clung to his body, so that his flesh was torn away with it. In such a sad plight he was carried on shipboard to Trachis… [Heracles] proceeded to Mount Oeta, in the Trachinian territory, and there constructed a pyre, mounted it, and gave orders to kindle it. When no one would do so, Poeas, passing by to look for his flocks, set a light to it. On him Hercules bestowed his bow. While the pyre was burning, it is said that a cloud passed under Hercules and with a peal of thunder wafted him up to heaven. Thereafter he obtained immortality-- Apollodorus, 'The Library,' 11; IV, 8-VII, 7

The Greek god Asclepius, who made the blind see, raised men from the dead, died, and was resurrected:

"Asclepius was the son of Apollo [a god] and Coronis [a mortal woman]...he healed many sick whose lives had been despaired of, and... he brought back to life many who had died."—Diodorus Siculus, The Library of History, 4.7.1.1- 2

When Hippolytus was killed,...Asclepius raised him from the dead."—Pausanias, Corinth, Description of Greece, 1.27.5

Hermon of Thasus. His blindness was cured by Asclepius.— Inscriptiones Graecae, 4.1.121 - 122, Stele 2.22

"The youth [Asklepios] blasted by ancestral bolts [of Zeus] soars from earth…Phoebus [Apollon], you whined. He is a god; smile at your father, who, for your sake, undoes his prohibitions [and grants Asklepios life]-- Ovid, Fasti 6.735

…Hercules [Herakles], of Castor and Pollux [the Dioskouroi], of Aesculapius [Asklepios] ... And these benefactors were duly deemed divine, as being both supremely good and immortal, because their souls survived and enjoyed eternal life.—Cicero, Cicero, De Natura Deorum 2.24


The salvation god Mithra, who spilled eternal blood to save humanity, and left his followers with a sacred Eucharist:

You [Mithra] have saved us by the shedding of eternal blood.—Inscription, Santa Prisca Mithraeum in Rome

This rite [communion] the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For they set forth bread and a cup of water with certain incantations in their ceremonies of initiation—Justin Martyr, First Apology 68

The Egyptian god Osiris, who died, was resurrected, and ascended to heaven, where he will judge the living and the dead, forever and ever:

[the first examination]
They [the Gods of the Underworld] say, "Come forward.
They say, "Who are you,"
They say, "What is your name?"
"I am the he who is equipped under the flowers, the-dweller-in-the-moringa Osiris is my name."—Egyptian book of the Dead

the rites celebrated by night agree with the accounts of the dismemberment of Osiris and his resurrection and regenesis—Plutarch, Isis and Osiris 364

Isis, who resurrected Osiris and with him guarantees salvation to all who except Osiris as savior:

The keys of hell and the guarantee of salvation were in the hands of the goddess, and the initiation ceremony itself a kind of voluntary death and salvation through divine grace.—
Apuleius, Metamorphosis, Book 11, 21

And [the followers of Isis & Osiris said], "Be of good cheer, O initiates, for the god is saved, and we shall have salvation— Firmicus Maternus, The Error of Pagan Religions, 22.1

The Greek god Dionysus, who turned water to wine, did miracles, died, and was resurrected:

One woman [bacchant]
struck her thyrsus against a rock and a fountain
of cool water came bubbling up. Another drove
her fennel in the ground, and where it struck the earth,
at the touch of god [Dionysus], a spring of wine poured out….— Euripides, The Bacchae, 707- 712

the fierce resentment of implacable Hera, the Titanes cunningly smeared their round faces with disguising chalk, and while he contemplated his changeling countenance reflected in a mirror they destroyed him with an infernal knife. There where his limbs had been cut piecemeal by the Titan steel, the end of his life was the beginning of a new life-- Nonnus, Dionysiaca 6.155

The devils, accordingly, when they heard these prophetic words, said that Bacchus was the son of Jupiter, and ...having been torn in pieces, he ascended into heaven--Justin Martyr, First Apology, 54
countjulian is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 04:06 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Waltham Abbey (11C?) has the Zodiac across its roof.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 01-15-2006, 06:49 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Yes, and the thing is also, that whatever asic story of Jesus there was, as the story of Jesus was spread among different cultures, it grew its own mythology.

Which is to say, whatever teh "origional" story from the Jews was, teh "full picture" of Jesus that we know today didn't really emerge until around the 7th or 8th cenurty CE, after the character had picked up many more aspects fo the old religions from among its various believers.

For the most part, however, most of the things that we attribute to Jesus were in place by the 3rd or 4th century.

Its easy to see how Jesus was said to do the things that the other gods did when people tried to spread his story.

Talking to Greeks who worshiped Dionysus:

"Let me tell you about Jesus... blah, blah, blah"

"Well, Dionysus turne water into wine, so what do you hav eot sy about that?"

"Yes , of course, Jesus turned water into wine too!"

Etc.

I mean come on.

The main thing, however, is that EVER SINGLE element of the Jesus story existed before the origin of the Jesus story. There is not one single unique element to the Jesus story, it si just a combination of several of the other stories that were prevalent in the region.

Now you tell me.

There are 4 or 5 myths that exist in a region that has literally hundreds of different religions, and low and behold, a "real person" is born that "just happens" to have a life that exactly follows the same events as these other mythical people, whose myths were embraced by the people where he was born.

Importantly, when you look at early Christian belief, what you see is that there was not concensus on who Jesus was, if Jesus was a real man, a god, or just an idea. You see that, for example, as late as 200 CE Christians still didn't associate the symbol of the cross with having anything to do with the death of Jesus.

Explanations for the worship of the cross, of which there are several written by early Christians, never mention anything about Jesus. The first image of Jesus on a cross is not known to have existed until the 7th century.

Here is an example:

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/03061.htm

Quote:
CHAPTER 12
The charge of worshipping a cross. The heathens themselves made much of crosses in sacred things; nay, their very idols were formed on a crucial frame.


As for him who affirms that we are "the priesthood of a cross," we shall claim him as our co-religionist. A cross is, in its material, a sign of wood; amongst yourselves also the object of worship is a wooden figure. Only, whilst with you the figure is a human one, with us the wood is its own figure. Never mind for the present what is the shape, provided the material is the same: the form, too, is of no importance, if so be it be the actual body of a god. If, however, there arises a question of difference on this point what, (let me ask,) is the difference between the Athenian Pallas, or the Pharian Ceres, and wood formed into a cross, when each is represented by a rough stock, without form, and by the merest rudiment of a statue of unformed wood? Every piece of timber which is fixed in the ground in an erect position is a part of a cross, and indeed the greater portion of its mass. But an entire cross is attributed to us, with its transverse beam, of course, and its projecting seat. Now you have the less to excuse you, for you dedicate to religion only a mutilated imperfect piece of wood, while others consecrate to the sacred purpose a complete structure. The truth, however, after all is, that your religion is all cross, as I shall show. You are indeed unaware that your gods in their origin have proceeded from this hated cross. Now, every image, whether carved out of wood or stone, or molten in metal, or produced out of any other richer material, must needs have had plastic hands engaged in its formation. Well, then, this modeller, before he did anything else, hit upon the form of a wooden cross, because even our own body assumes as its natural position the latent and concealed outline of a cross. Since the head rises upwards, and the back takes a straight direction, and the shoulders project laterally, if you simply place a man with his arms and hands outstretched, you will make the general outline of a cross. Starting, then, from this rudimental form and prop, as it were, he applies a covering of clay, and so gradually completes the limbs, and forms the body, and covers the cross within with the shape which he meant to impress upon the clay; then from this design, with the help of compasses and leaden moulds, he has got all ready for his image which is to be brought out into marble, or clay, or whatever the material be of which he has determined to make his god. (This, then, is the process after the cross-shaped frame, the clay; after the clay, the god. In a well-understood routine, the cross passes into a god through the clayey medium. The cross then you consecrate, and from it the consecrated (deity) begins to derive his origin. By way of example, let us take the case of a tree which grows up into a system of branches and foliage, and is a reproduction of its own kind, whether it springs from the kernel of an olive, or the stone of a peach, or a grain of pepper which has been duly tempered under ground. Now, if you transplant it, or take a cutting off its branches for another plant, to what will you attribute what is produced by the propagation? Will it not be to the grain, or the stone, or the kernel? Because, as the third stage is attributable to the second, and the second in like manner to the first, so the third will have to be referred to the first, through the second as the mean. We need not stay any longer in the discussion of this point, since by a natural law every kind of produce throughout nature refers back its growth to its original source; and just as the product is comprised in its primal cause, so does that cause agree in character with the thing produced. Since, then, in the production of your gods, you worship the cross which originates them, here will be the original kernel and grain, from which are propagated the wooden materials of your idolatrous images. Examples are not far to seek. Your victories you celebrate with religious ceremony as deities; and they are the more august in proportion to the joy they bring you. The frames on which you hang up your trophies must be crosses: these are, as it were, the very core of your pageants. Thus, in your victories, the religion of your camp makes even crosses objects of worship; your standards it adores, your standards are the sanction of its oaths; your standards it prefers before Jupiter himself, But all that parade of images, and that display of pure gold, are (as so many) necklaces of the crosses. in like manner also, in the banners and ensigns, which your soldiers guard with no less sacred care, you have the streamers (and) vestments of your crosses. You are ashamed, I suppose, to worship unadorned and simple crosses.
Now you tell me. Do you think that a major Christian father, in 197 CE, would provide an explanation for why Christians worship a cross without mentioning Jesus if the story of Jesus being killed on a cross was known at the time?

Today people claim that Christian worship a cross because it is a symbol of the instrumen tof Jesus' death, yet in 200 CE the fact is that Christians had never heard of such a thing.
Malachi151 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.