FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-01-2006, 06:55 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 1,079
Default 06-01-06 or 06-06-06?

I had read where an ancient papyrus of reveleations clearly shows the number of the beast as 616 and not 666. Would'nt that make today, 06-01-06, the Beast Day instead of 06-06-06?

Damn, now where am I going to get enuough kittens on such short notice for the barbeque tonight?
rickP is offline  
Old 06-01-2006, 07:00 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC (formerly Denmark)
Posts: 3,789
Default

The papyrus is P115, also known as P.Oxy. 4499, and some info can be found here.

Or by using google like so: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Julian
Julian is offline  
Old 06-01-2006, 08:53 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire
Posts: 498
Default

Depends how you write your dates. Here in the UK, 06/01/06 was back in January...
markfiend is offline  
Old 06-01-2006, 08:59 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,719
Default

This brings up something I've always wondered about. 666 as a special number only works in our decimal system. Was that in use at the time? In Roman numerals it would be something like DCLXVI (I hope I got that right), which, while having the property it uses all numerals less than M exactly once an in descending order, is otherwise unremarkable. Hm, maybe that actually is remarkable...
gstafleu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.