Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Chili · 01-27-2011, 05:34 PM

I think Carlson should have gone to the sugar factory because adulterated salt taste sweet which precisely is what the purpose of adulteration is . . . as in the famous Jn 3:16 salvation prayer with a 'sugar spin' for the kids.

Chili · 01-27-2011, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephan huller

It is well known that Justin called his gospels ἀπομνημονεύματα τῶν ἀποστόλων - but could an ἀπομνημονεύματα or υπομνήματα be considered a 'divinely inspired' gospel text? The terms were used to denote something developed from memory but in the Platonic sense (a context which Justin was surely rooted) it was the first step towards something complete and ultimately perfected. I find it hard to reconcile a 'Holy Spirit' coming down from heaen to establish an ἀπομνημονεύματα or υπομνήματα. Indeed it is utterly absurd.

Sorry but that is not absurd at all unless you are stuck with heaven being a place up in the sky someplace youself.

The HS is based on the relationship between the left and right brain in the mind of man also expressed as the father and the son. Now notice that after Christ was born unto Joseph-the-Jew the child 'shall' be called Jesus instead of Christ and it was at that time when the father and the son became one and hence the dove descended because it was no longer of any use with the left brain united (at-one-ment) with the right on top of which the veil was [fully] rent later on from top to bottom so we would never miss that as a stated fact.

So now then the question my be asked who is in charge of the HS which has to be the ever subservient and passive voice of the woman in the TOL (we call her Mary) who so is the Queen of Angels prior to rebirth and crowned Queen of Heaven and Earth to say that she may be in charge of our troika wherever it goes but that does not mean that our speech is always inspired [ex cathedra] even after the temple veil was fully rent. So therefore the word HS may be an abuse of its true meaning but since the vision of the Gospeler is still subject to the faculty of reason to find the proper words to express 'that of which' there is no rational convention in existence, the word 'inspired' is the best they can do to bring the message home to us 'below.'

Please note that glossolalia is also right brain speech that just flows over 'the dam' (Zamjatin WE, Dutton page 107 and cf page 9 with 107 by inference), wherein we are called 'a-dam' in our second nature (Jay please note) that was created in Gen.3:10 and here now is to be left behind in the mind of the Joseph the upright Jew. So our faculty of reason is always required to induce reason into our speech and that happens at our voicebox which is referred to as 'the dam' that made us Adam and Jesus so the second Adam after he was raised but still remains in function so that reason can prevail.

What I find more absurd is that nobody has ever figured out to say that Matthew and Mark are there to show us how to do it wrong and Luke and John how to do it right . . . and of course the difference between rigth and wrong is either heaven or hell on earth and they show us that too.

Chili · 01-27-2011, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephan huller

What the copybook accomplished was a reflection of one’s own mind and experiences on paper, frozen in time and available for later reflection and analysis. The ability to record one’s life now existed for the Greeks, and “these new instruments were immediately used for the constitution of a permanent relationship to oneself” wherein “one must manage oneself as a governor manages the governed, as a head of an enterprise manages his enterprise” (Foucault 363).

The copybook allowed Greeks to view themselves as governable, primarily through the task of regulation made possible through reflection upon one’s own recorded life. Greek self-evaluation became a practice of “exercising upon oneself as exact a mastery as that of a sovereign against whom there would no longer be revolts” (Foucault 363). Thus, the copybook served as a way to conquer oneself, to render undesirable feelings, thoughts, or inclinations powerless through the control of one’s own mind. Conquering one’s own life, regulating and recording it, was aligned with “perfect government of the self” (Foucault 363). At the same time, hypomnemata “also formed a raw material for the writing of more systematic treatises in which were arguments and means by which to struggle against some defect (such as anger, envy, gossip, flattery) or to overcome some difficult circumstance (a mourning, an exile, downfall, disgrace)” (Foucault 364).

That must be on the mechanical square heaven that requires castration, is it?

01-27-2011, 05:34 PM	#1
Chili Banned Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Alberta Posts: 11,885	Chili digressions split form Justins use of the term ... I think Carlson should have gone to the sugar factory because adulterated salt taste sweet which precisely is what the purpose of adulteration is . . . as in the famous Jn 3:16 salvation prayer with a 'sugar spin' for the kids.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.