FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2004, 10:57 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 254
Default Unearthing the Bible

I'm almost finished with this book and I'm simply amazed. I've learned so much from it, I'm seriously stunned. The Exodus never occurred. Abraham and Moses probably didn't exist. David and Solomon were petty kings amongst sheepherders.

Reading about how Judah denigrated much of Israel's history and then co-opted it...fascinating.

Oh, and the Omrides? All I can say is, poor Jezebel.

Ok anyways, it's a great book and I'm learning a lot from it. Yay archaeology!
ceinwyn is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 12:44 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

It is a great book. I question their justification for historical David and Solomon . . . but everyone is a critic!

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 05:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 932
Default Unearthing the Bible or the Bible Unearthed

I assume you mean:

Finkelstein & N.A. Silberman, 2001, The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts?

Or is there a new one out with a similar name
gregor is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 09:38 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Bible Unearthed
Toto is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 10:30 AM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
Default

Stupid question time: did anyone in the bible actually live on this earth?

Sincerely,

Christ
Randy X is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 10:52 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 254
Default

Yes, the title is actually "The Bible Unearthed". Sorry, must've had a brainfart there. Happens a bit too often these days, in my old age.

Re Christ's question: the book seems to think that quite a few characters from the bible lived, just not in the situations that are commonly accepted.

Then again, check Doctor X's response...so who knows, really!
ceinwyn is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 10:58 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the impenetrable fortress of the bubbleheads
Posts: 1,308
Default

Maybe but I wouldn't trust the dates or anything else for that matter.
Jabu Khan is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 11:46 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 258
Default

Sorry for going off-topic. I just had to ask that question.

Sincerely,

Christ
Randy X is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 02:22 PM   #9
Nom
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Joisey
Posts: 124
Default

I polished The Bible Unearthed off last week; a good read, IMHO, but a bit inaccessable. It could have used some more background on archeology -- some explanation of things like dating by stratification -- not to mention a few more maps. You tend to get lost fairly quickly among the many towns and cities of Israel and Judah. But the basic message (that the OT is pretty much all fiction) is clear. It's also kind of depressing, in that it makes clear that people are endlessly willing to rewrite history when their vision of the end of the world/God's kingdom fails to arrive, versus admitting they're full of ca-ca.

The one thing the book mentions that piqued my interest but that it didn't go into was the big dollop of social justice built into the OT (pp. 285-87). F&S present this as something new and different; has anyone ever written anything examining whether it really was, and if so, where it came from?
Nom is offline  
Old 02-25-2004, 02:59 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default

It happens that I just got this book last week, and I'm still reading it. One thing that bugs me about it is that there are some pictures in there that are supposed to be artifacts depicting for example Egyptians fighting the "Sea People" etc, and they aren't photos of those artifacts, or 19th century style etchings, they're fairly crude line drawings. That bugs me.

Another bit that bugs me . . . there's a bit about a scrap of some artifact which is supposed to show that so-and-so killed thus-and-such, a "stele" and there's so
much in brackets, and this is hardly mentioned. (I'm making this example below up, I don't have the book in front of me)
It's something like:

[and then King Rehoab]ram killed [kin]g so-an[d-so and turned their city to du]st forever and ever.

And you're sitting there thinking, "What the --- what do the brackets mean? Is that the part they filled in?

I think it's a good book but, I think it could have been a lot better, with more photos, and more explanation of the archaeology.

Also, at times, it appears to get a bit repetitious and tedious. It's tough to keep the narratives which are archaeologically supported separated in your mind from those which are summaries of what's in the Bible. And it's tough to evaluate the strength of the archaeological support fo many of the claims as well. The case appears to my untrained mind to be rather well made that the Pentateuch we have today has it's written origins in the 7th century BCE, and that the Exodus never actually happened.
Godless Wonder is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.