FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2013, 08:28 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
Default

Quote:
De Rossi, Duchesne, Cumont, Doelger and Abel have successfully demonstrated that the content as well as the language proves beyond doubt its Christian origin.
Did ya get that part Pete? its 'beyond a doubt' ......as long as you put your ultra-poweful Christian Urim and Thummim super peeper spectacles on.
Sheshbazzar is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 10:12 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post



See Kriophoros (Good Shepherd)


The CHRESTOS Shepherd.
But shepherds are not Christians and I can still hear them say: Then who can be saved?

And further, there is not a Christian home at the Vatican either, as they are all Catholic. You should talk to the Baptist once and see what they say about Catholics being Christians and so, I do not want their theology on my doorstep, but love being here.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:12 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

The question is whether this inscription is unambiguous evidence of a Christian presence.
From “Looking for Abercius: Re-Imagining Contexts of Interpretation of the Earliest Christian Inscription” Margaret M. Mitchell, University of Chicago

Quote:
Early research divided quickly between Protestant authors who questioned the Christian identity of the inscription (famously Ficker, Harnack and later Dieterich, though differently Dölger, von Campenhausen, Th. Zahn7), and Catholic scholars who championed its Christian nature, seeing it further as a witness to the centrality of Rome-based Christian orthodoxy and orthopraxy as widespread already by the late second century (de Rossi, Ferrua, Abel, later Guarducci).8 Today virtually no scholars of any stripe dispute that the inscription is Christian,9 though exactly what that meant in the late second century remains disputed.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:20 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Oh no. We'll have to find something new to argue about, like whether water is really flammable or whether gravity exists.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 12:44 AM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I don't see the point of arguing. Is it "unambiguously" Christian? It is about what you would expect from a second century Christian living in a pagan culture, who threw in a few Christian symbols aimed at fellow members of his secret society. It would take some research to track down the reasoning of the scholars who have decided that this is clearly Christian - I imagine that the combined references to shepherd, fish, Virgin, queen, wine, bread, all add up.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 07:59 AM   #16
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Quote:
I have studied the book.
Is 'study' new Australian slang for 'selectively referencing' a book?
I made a list of all so-called Christian and/or Chrestian inscriptions claimed to be earlier than Constantine the Great Bullshit Artist. Do you have a problem with this approach?
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 08:07 AM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheshbazzar View Post
Quote:
De Rossi, Duchesne, Cumont, Doelger and Abel have successfully demonstrated that the content as well as the language proves beyond doubt its Christian origin.
Did ya get that part Pete? its 'beyond a doubt' ......as long as you put your ultra-poweful Christian Urim and Thummim super peeper spectacles on.
Loud and clear.

We could examine the first person on the list - de Rossi.

De Rossi was a corrupt and inventive papal archaeologist.

De Rossi fabricated evidence. (See below)




Quote:
Originally Posted by Graydon Snyder in ANTE PACEM

"The real founders of the science of early Christian archaeology came in the 19th century:
Giuseppe Marchi (1795-1860) and Giovanni de Rossi (1822-1894)...[the latter] published
between 1857 and 1861 the first volume of "Inscriptiones christianae urbis Romae". Pope
Pius IX moved beyond collecting by appointing in 1852 a commission - "Commissione de
archaelogia sacra" - that would be responsible for all early Christian remains."

About de Rossi ....

Giovanni Battista de Rossi (1822-1894) considered the greatest of the 19th century Roman archaeologists. As a loyal member of the Catholic Church, he was asked by Pope Pius IX to publish his works under the Vatican imprint. In 1857 the Vatican press printed his Inscriptiones christianae Urbis Romae. The work contained 1126 inscriptions dating from the year AD 71 to 589[1] His most famous discovery was made in 1849. In a shed belonging to a wineyard, he found a stone with the partial inscription
...NELIUS MARTYR.

The only possible name was Cornelius. Pope Cornelius (251-253) died in exile, and was therefore considered a martyr.

NB: A later edition of Inscriptiones contained a total of 1374 inscriptions. The first four were scrapped as forgeries, meaning that the oldest known Christian inscription in Rome is a memorial to Emperor Caracalla's chamberlain Prosenes, who died in 217.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 08:22 AM   #18
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
I don't see the point of arguing.

The point is the historical truth of Christian origins and whether the historical truth has been concealed by a rich powerful and corrupt organisation. The point is that the evidence itself must be understood for what it is and what it is not.


Quote:
Is it "unambiguously" Christian? It is about what you would expect from a second century Christian living in a pagan culture, who threw in a few Christian symbols aimed at fellow members of his secret society.
But did you read the sequence of events that surrounded the discovery of this inscription? The involvement of the papal archaeologist de Rossi should suggest a second and third look at any ambiguity.



Quote:
It would take some research to track down the reasoning of the scholars who have decided that this is clearly Christian - I imagine that the combined references to shepherd, fish, Virgin, queen, wine, bread, all add up.

I think you will find that the Abercius inscription known as the "Queen of Early Hobbit Inscriptions" has a great priority that descends from the Pope Pious IX in the 19th century. The "Inscriptiones christianae urbis Romae". is a fat expensive and exceedingly lavish authority that was lapped up by many people before the early forgeries were weeded out.

I could be wrong but I think Richard Carrier in one of his articles or talks makes reference to evidence earlier than Bullneck. I am not sure whether he has stated explicitly what evidence he relies on for this statement, but it sounded like a reference to items on this "Inscriptiones christianae urbis Romae". and might include this Abercius inscription.

I would like to find out the sequence of events in more detail concerning how the inscription was found and how it was reconstructed, who was involved and who over-sighted the dig. Dig?

I don't trust the fucking Pope.

OVER.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 10:56 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Pete - there's a wealth of information in the article I linked to. Can you access it?
Toto is offline  
Old 01-11-2013, 01:41 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Quote:
I have studied the book.
Is 'study' new Australian slang for 'selectively referencing' a book?

Quote mined. :constern01:
outhouse is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.