FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-10-2013, 04:23 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default Inscription of Abercius split from Why Contradictions Unresolved

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Quote:
And resident inquisitor for heretics like MM.
Hardly an inquisitor. Things have to make sense and my point was simply the more 'ifs' you have in a proposition (and MM has layer upon layer of these 'ifs') the more unlikely and unworthy the original question was. I have no problem with people discussing any topic they like. They just have to recognize that everything mountainman says is 'if squared'

i.e. - if we assume that the gospel was non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume the Pauline writings were non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume that all the writings of the Church Fathers were non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume that all external (pagan) witnesses to Christianity were forged and if we assume that there is no physical evidence for Christianity dated before Eusebius (i.e. that the Abericius monument, the evidence from Dura Europos etc were all forged and the various fragments are misinterpreted) then ...

The inscription of Abercius

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIKI
.... is the Greek epitaph of Abercius, Bishop of Hieropolis, in Phrygia. It is an important example of early Christian epigraphy.
An inscription to a Pre Nicene Christian Bishop?
Ha ha ha ha ha.

The Inscription of Abercius speaks of "The Shepherd" not "The Christian".

That this allegorical text refers to anything christian is only by way of assumption.

For example, there have been a number of different interpretations of Abercius. In 1894 G. Ficker, supported by O. Hirschfeld, strove to prove that Abercius was a priest of Cybele. In 1895 A. Harnack offered an explanation based upon religious syncretism and in 1896, Dieterich made Abercius a priest of Attis.

Also the WARNING WARNING WARNING signs need to be clearly flashing because the papal archaeologist De Rossi has his finger prints all over the evidence.

Am I a heretic for refusing to confess that this inscription of an "Early Christian Bishop" is not unambiguously Christian?
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 04:37 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Quote:
And resident inquisitor for heretics like MM.
Hardly an inquisitor. Things have to make sense and my point was simply the more 'ifs' you have in a proposition (and MM has layer upon layer of these 'ifs') the more unlikely and unworthy the original question was. I have no problem with people discussing any topic they like. They just have to recognize that everything mountainman says is 'if squared'

i.e. - if we assume that the gospel was non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume the Pauline writings were non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume that all the writings of the Church Fathers were non-existent before Eusebius and if we assume that all external (pagan) witnesses to Christianity were forged and if we assume that there is no physical evidence for Christianity dated before Eusebius (i.e. that the Abericius monument, the evidence from Dura Europos etc were all forged and the various fragments are misinterpreted) then ...

The inscription of Abercius

Quote:
Originally Posted by WIKI
.... is the Greek epitaph of Abercius, Bishop of Hieropolis, in Phrygia. It is an important example of early Christian epigraphy.
An inscription to a Pre Nicene Christian Bishop?
Ha ha ha ha ha.

The Inscription of Abercius speaks of "The Shepherd" not "The Christian".

That this allegorical text refers to anything christian is only by way of assumption.

For example, there have been a number of different interpretations of Abercius. In 1894 G. Ficker, supported by O. Hirschfeld, strove to prove that Abercius was a priest of Cybele. In 1895 A. Harnack offered an explanation based upon religious syncretism and in 1896, Dieterich made Abercius a priest of Attis.

Also the WARNING WARNING WARNING signs need to be clearly flashing because the papal archaeologist De Rossi has his finger prints all over the evidence.

Am I a heretic for refusing to confess that this inscription of an "Early Christian Bishop" is not unambiguously Christian?
So are you saying that the inscription was "The Shepherd" that is translated to mean "The Christian?" That would be wrong because Priests are not Christians either.

A priest is a shepherd and all he needs to know is hither and thither they go, but is not a Christan for sure and if he was he would never tell either.
Chili is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 05:55 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

From my notes ...

Text inscribed into a slab was found in 1882 by an English traveller, W. Ramsay, at Kelendres, near Synnada, in Phrygia Salutaris (Asia Minor). This inscribed slab was bearing the date of the year 300 of the Phrygian era (216 CE).

The inscription in question recalled the memory of a certain Alexander, son of Anthony. De Rossi and Duchesne at once recognized in it phrases similar to those in the epitaph of Abercius.


On comparison it was found that the inscription in memory of Alexander corresponded, almost word for word, with the first and last verses of the epitaph of the Bishop of Hieropolis; all the middle part was missing.


Mr. Ramsay, on a second visit to the site of Hieropolis, in 1883, discovered two new fragments covered with inscriptions, built into the masonry of the public baths. These fragments, which are now in the Vatican Christian Museum, filled out the middle part of the stele inscribed with the epitaph of Abercius. It now became possible, with the help of the text preserved in the Life, to restore the original text of the epitaph with practical certainty.

The subject of the epitaph is often identified with a writer named Abercius Marcellus, author of a work against the Montanists, and claimed to be at one time the christian Bishop of Hieropolis, in Phrygia. Some fragments of this work have been preserved by Eusebius.

Here is the text from Quasten, Patrology, v. 1, p. 172.


1. The citizens of an eminent city, I made this (tomb)
2. In my lifetime, that I might have here a resting-place for my body.
3. Abercius by name, I am a disciple of the chaste shepherd,
4. Who feedeth His flocks of sheep on mountains and plains,
5. Who hath great eyes that look on all sides.
6. He taught me . . . faithful writings.
7. He sent me to Rome, to behold a kingdom
8. And to see a queen with golden robe and golden shoes.
9. There I saw a people bearing the splended seal.
10. And I saw the plain of Syria and all the cities, even Nisibis,
11. Having crossed the Euphrates. And everywhere I had associates
12. Having Paul as a companion, everywhere faith led the way
13. And set before me food the fish from the spring
14. Mighty and pure, whom a spotless Virgin caught,
15. And gave this to friends to eat, always
16. Having sweet wine and giving the mixed cup with bread.
17. These words, I, Abercius, standing by, ordered to be inscribed.
18. In truth, I was in the course of my seventy-second year.
19. Let him who understands and believes this pray for Abercius.
20. But no man shall place another tomb upon mine.
21. If one do so, he shall pay to the treasury of the Romans two thousand pieces of gold,
22. And to my beloved fatherland Hieropolis, one thousand pieces of gold.





See Kriophoros (Good Shepherd)


The CHRESTOS Shepherd.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:19 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Another image. This time of mountainman's tediously desperate claims:

stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:25 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Early Christian Wriitings has more.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:30 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default


And you know there are countless inscriptions from that part of the world. I forget where I saw them. But there is a book I once cited of many more Christian inscriptions from Asia Minor. All from the third century. This is like trying to have an argument over the sky being blue. There are many unresolved questions in early Christianity. Whether Christianity can be dated before Nicaea isn't one of them.

It's like running into a wall with your head. The fact that you can keep running into a wall doesn't prove that the wall does't exist. It's just the disorientation caused by repeated impact that leads one to a false conclusion.

There must have been people in the same predicament at the end of the Roman Empire. The Empire may have been recognized to be corrupt, and those defending it probably admitted it. But the hordes of moronic barbarians trying to climb over the walls were even worse.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:33 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
Another image. This time of mountainman's tediously desperate claims:
You made the claim that the Abercius inscription of physical evidence for Christianity.

This claim albeit widely held is tediously desperate.



What evidence do you present that the Abercius inscription is what it is claimed to be by the papal archaeologist de Rossi?

And Abercius seems to follow the Good Shepherd, or the Chrestos Shepherd.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:36 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

The question is whether this inscription is unambiguous evidence of a Christian presence.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:39 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post

And you know there are countless inscriptions from that part of the world. I forget where I saw them. But there is a book I once cited of many more Christian inscriptions from Asia Minor. All from the third century.

The Christians for Christians Inscriptions of Phrygia by Elsa Gibson.

I have studied the book. The link above is to my review of the data.

Quote:
This is like trying to have an argument over the sky being blue. There are many unresolved questions in early Christianity. Whether Christianity can be dated before Nicaea isn't one of them.
Don't be so sure.
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-10-2013, 06:43 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
I have studied the book.
Is 'study' new Australian slang for 'selectively referencing' a book?
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.