FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-19-2004, 07:46 AM   #21
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Chilli

May I refer you to the above thread and to Jung's Answers to Job?

The concept of the Queen of Heaven is touching on key mythological and psychological aspects of being human.

We are all conscious of our humanity and our "divinity"(is this consciousness?), and all these myths we create are attempts to express these issues. As it says below, the medieval church went too heavily into a divine Christ, and psychologically needed a human Mary to become a new Christ for us.
There is absolutely nothing human about Mary and the Mary we know and venerate will always be divine so she can be our light by day and by night. She, in fact, is (sic) the divinity of Christ prior to resurrection and gave birth to the son of Man so she can make him fully man which is her only way to become queen of heaven and earth. This same idea is also presented to us in Coriolanus I.iii.15-18 where Volumnia "sprang not more in joy at first hearing that he was a man-child than now in first seeing that he had proved himself a man." The point here is that it is relatively easy to rape her but that would be the end of us become "fully man" or "fully mature in Christ" or "fully Israel" or "young man in the tomb," etc. Christ is just Christ but Mary is what makes a man out of Christ.
Quote:

Christianity with the concept of the bride of Christ has always had a two way tension - God becoming human and humans becoming God.
True, the tension is universal in Christianity because we are created in the image of God but the transition from God-in-beoming to becoming-God is reserved for Catholics only (tragic really, but that's just how it is).

Quote:
Personally, maybe this is why I find the symbol of the tao so fascinating!
Same here. The evolutionary period follows the involutionary period but not until the involutionay period ends. We have this same symbol in our church calender year with Yang running from Easter to Advent and Yin from Advent to Easter.

I never read Job so I really can't comment on Jung's idea here but I will say that Mary is never ever an active part of creation but at best is the passive negative stand against which creation occurs.

I should add that Volumnia is is the "[infinite] volume of Mary," "Virgilia" is the virginity of Mary and Valeria is the valor of Mary and these three qualities are required to become fully man. This play is written to be juxtaposed with MacBeth where Lady Macbeth had no other name but Lady MacBeth because she was a tramp that was on the forefront in the mind of Macbeth where she did not belong.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-19-2004, 07:48 AM   #22
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abe smith
Is chili Amos? It never seemed likely that Amos wd be gone from here for long. Hi, Amos?
Hi abe, how are you. Amos lost his E-mail address but that's OK because he was an imposter anyway.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-20-2004, 09:31 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default

Wow. Chili IZZ Amos revidivus. (That''s probably not how you spell that.)
In that case, 'bye, Amos.
abe smith is offline  
Old 07-20-2004, 09:03 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abe smith
Wow. Chili IZZ Amos revidivus. (That''s probably not how you spell that.)
In that case, 'bye, Amos.
Hi abe and I am glad you stopped in to say hello. BTW, have you noticed that my new name "Chili" is more gender friendly?
Chili is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 05:03 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
According to me the gospels take place in what we call Purgatory which really is the period between rebirth and resurrection.

I get my stuff from the Gospels and various sources of lyric poetry. I like poetry best because it gives me much more freedom to find what I am looking for and it is less likely to be slanted by translators with a certain point of view.

One of my favorites in this area is a translation of the Chinese poem by Pound. It is called "A River Merchant's Wife: A letter" and here we see that this river merchant's wife is our Mary who will come to meet him as far as "Cho-fu-sa."
So your sources for your particular take on theology are a conflation or syncretization of the gospel narratives with lyric, sometimes Chinese, poetry?

Oddly, my reading of Gnosticism shows a connection between this form of Xtianity with Buddhism and Hinduism.

But neither the gospel narratives or Chinese theology have a Purgatory so I do not know how that comes into it. You lost me there.
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 06:58 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Default

Hi Amos, long time no see. Should have recognized you immediately in the first place......
Answerer is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 01:40 AM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default Who was Mary Magdalene?

I strongly recommend a close look at this hypothesis!

Mary
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 09:52 PM   #28
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magdlyn
But neither the gospel narratives or Chinese theology have a Purgatory so I do not know how that comes into it. You lost me there.

Oh it's just the one poem I read and Pound was very proud of his translation (I don't think he understood the poem well enough to rationalize it).

She, the river merchants wife, is our Mary who asked if he was returning home through the "narrows of the river Kiang" and if he did she would meet him at Cho-fu-sa . . . which is our gate of purgatory where the royal banquet takes place.

So Magdlyn, let's not call it Purgatory with a capital P but just the purgation period which is the time that born again believers "enter the race" and begin to work out their own salvation. Notice that I recognize the "born again" experience and also that this event (?) brings about change (as in metanoia) because they have been called by name and now are a new creation (child of God).

In the bible it is not good enough to remain a child of God and the Gospels show us how to mature and become one with God (lest we spent the rest of our life trying to work out our own salvation and die nonetheless). The point here is that we can succeed and "never die" or the "nonetheless" in Jn.6:58 is wrong. If this is true the "never die" takes on a different meaning because the second death will be there for all of us. The difference, then, is that we will either die in heaven, in hell (purgatory for 40 years is equal to hell), or just like a "cold" believer/doubter who never entered the race.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 10:05 PM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Answerer
Hi Amos, long time no see. Should have recognized you immediately in the first place......
Hi Answerer we went satelite direct (Direcway) and that caused some problems with my registration here. So, I like Chili better anyway.
Chili is offline  
Old 07-26-2004, 10:11 PM   #30
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Thread split by Vorkosigan, direct all flames in that direction.
Vorkosigan is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.