FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-20-2005, 12:21 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's "There will always be a Jewish people"

Lee Merrill claims that the survival of the Jewish people is the fulfillment of some Bible prophecies, but there is no evidence that the prophecies were inspired by God. First of all, there is not any evidence at all that God made a land promise to Abraham. Second of all, regarding Lee's mention of Hitler's attempts to destroy the Jews, there was a much greater number of Jews living outside of Germany than there were inside Germany, so his argument is preposterous. If God actually intended to preserve the Jewish people, I do not have any idea why he did so. The Jews had Jesus killed, and the vast majority of them have always rejected Christianity since it was founded. In addition, the state in which the Jews have survived is most certainly NOT indicative of God's favoritism towards Jews. If anything, the indication from God to Jews is "you guys are on your own."
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 01:26 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There is no evidence that the Jews had Jesus killed.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 06:35 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's 'There will always be a Jewish people.'

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
There is no evidence that the Jews had Jesus killed.
I agree. I was just going along with the Christian version for debate purposes. I wonder why Christians do not find it strange that the Christian God has chosen to preserve a people who for the most part have historically rejected his Son.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 11:05 AM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
I agree. I was just going along with the Christian version for debate purposes. I wonder why Christians do not find it strange that the Christian God has chosen to preserve a people who for the most part have historically rejected his Son.
Not all Christians believe this, especially since the Holocaust hit them over the head with the consequences of the medieval passion play assertion that evil Jews in league with the devil killed their Christ.

In any case, Christians have a variety of ways of rationalizing their beliefs and the interaction of their beliefs and what they see in the world. You can't speak for all of them, and you can't pick a few parts of doctrine and ignore others and expect to have anything coherent. The survival of the Jewish people is no more of a theological problem that the growth of the Islamic religion or the overpopulation of the earth.
Toto is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 03:45 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

I hate to interrupt here, but Matthew is very clear that the Jews have an eternal responsibility to the death of Jesus Christ. Whether about them in cahoots with el diablo or whether Christians want to regard Matthew in such matters are totally different stories. Christians aren't necessarily the most consistent people.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 10-20-2005, 08:46 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's "There will always be a Jewish people"

Following is my revised opening post:

Lee Merrill claims that the survival of the Jewish people is the fulfillment of some Bible prophecies, but there is no evidence that the prophecies were inspired by God. First of all, there is not any evidence at all that God made a land promise to Abraham. Second of all, regarding Lee's mention of Hitler's attempts to destroy the Jews, there was a much greater number of Jews living outside of Germany than there were inside Germany, so his argument is preposterous.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 10-22-2005, 09:35 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
I hate to interrupt here, but Matthew is very clear that the Jews have an eternal responsibility to the death of Jesus Christ. Whether about them in cahoots with el diablo or whether Christians want to regard Matthew in such matters are totally different stories. Christians aren't necessarily the most consistent people.
I have doubts whether 'his blood be upon us and on our children' is intended to imply an eternal responsibility upon the Jewish people.

In Biblical thought the responsibility before God of people for their ancestors' crime is usually for a limited number of generations. See for example Exodus 34:7 'visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children's children to the third and the fourth generation.'

Matthew is probably primarily thinking of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE a generation or so after the death of Jesus.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-22-2005, 06:27 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's 'There will always be a Jewish people'

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
I have doubts whether 'his blood be upon us and on our children' is intended to imply an eternal responsibility upon the Jewish people.

In Biblical thought the responsibility before God of people for their ancestors' crime is usually for a limited number of generations. See for example Exodus 34:7 'visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children and the children's children to the third and the fourth generation.'

Matthew is probably primarily thinking of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE a generation or so after the death of Jesus.

Andrew Criddle
Andrew, what about Lee Merrill's claim that the survival of the Jewish people is a fulfillmemt of some Bible prophecies? What about Lee's views about hte Babylon prophecy and the Tyre prophecy. What is one of your favorite fulfilled prophecies? Do you categorize yourself as a fundamentalist Christian?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 10-22-2005, 11:45 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
Andrew, what about Lee Merrill's claim that the survival of the Jewish people is a fulfillmemt of some Bible prophecies? What about Lee's views about hte Babylon prophecy and the Tyre prophecy. What is one of your favorite fulfilled prophecies? Do you categorize yourself as a fundamentalist Christian?
a/ I believe that the continued existence of the Jewish people is a demonstration of God's faithfulness, whether or not it is a clear fulfillment of specific scriptures.

b/ I am rather dubious about what Lee has claimed about Tyre and Babylon although I have to confess to having read these very very very long threads rather rapidly.

c/ I suppose I would class Isaiah 53 as one of my favourite fulfilled scriptures regrding it as fulfilled by Jesus Christ

d/ I would not regard myself as a fundamentalist Christian in the usual definition of fundamentalist. (although you may be using the term widely to include any orthodox Protestant in which case my answer would be different.)

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:46 PM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default Lee Merrill's 'There will always be a Jewish people'

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
I believe that the continued existence of the Jewish people is a demonstration of God's faithfulness, whether or not it is a clear fulfillment of specific scriptures.
Why is that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewCriddle
I suppose I would class Isaiah 53 as one of my favourite fulfilled scriptures regrding it as fulfilled by Jesus Christ.
The key verse in Isaiah 53 basically says that "he was wounded for our transgressions, and bruised for our iniquities," but there is not any evidence at all that Jesus' shed blood and death remitted the sins of believers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewCriddle
I would not regard myself as a fundamentalist Christian in the usual definition of fundamentalist. (although you may be using the term widely to include any orthodox Protestant in which case my answer would be different.)
What I am most interested in is do you oppose physician assisted suicide, homosexuality, and physician assisted suicide, and do you believe that homosexuals who are professing Christians will go to hell.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.