JoeWallack

JW:
A few weeks ago I saw Mel Gibson's Jesus' movie (forgot the name), re-read The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ and meditated on the traditional moral authority of the Church (especially its handling of male children). For the first time I understood how a mythical story of Jesus suffering for a few hours on a stake thousands of years ago explained the reason for the historical fact of most of my innocent relatives being tortured and murdered over a 5 year period by Nazis from a Christian country in modern times.

My good friend, Rabbi Singer, head of Outreach Judaism, had the exact same experience so we began to study JP Holding's website, Tektonics.org, together while periodically rereading Isaiah Chapter 53 (but only the KJV version) and Adam's Gospel Sources posts here in light of the new information which this website provided us and avoiding all articles by Dr. Richard Carrier and Bart Ehrman. It wasn't long before we found the truth that we were looking for, that if you start with the conclusion that Jesus Christ was the prophesied Jewish Messiah according to the Tanakh, than you will conclude that Jesus Christ was the prophesied Jewish Messiah according to the Tanakh. Hallelujah Amen.

Effective immediately ErrancyWiki will be closed and then merged with Messianic Apologetic as an evangelistic tool.


In Hymn, Joseph Elizabeth Wallack

ErrancyWiki

thief of fire

An evagelistic tool? What will be the aim?

spin

Fuck, Joe, how could you? I mean, really. After prostituting yourself with the Errancywiki so long, now you're flashing a bit of leg the other way? Oh, my.

:melodramatic:

maryhelena

Wow - that's the stuff of nightmares......

Much better to dream by the day....

So, in homage to youtube and it's failure to close down last night - enjoy this...


Alfie Boe 'If I can Dream' live NIA Birmingham 22.03.13 HD

Chili

Not sure if I read this right, but the merger suggests you have switched sides while remaining true to your heritage, good deal and no problem there, except those hallelujah's maybe.

So be careful Joseph because there can not be such thing as a Christian Gospel or there would be a temple in the New Jerusalem. That is lesson number one, to never forget if reality is sought.

It is fair to say that Jesus Christ is the promised messiah of the Jewish Tradition (that the OT tries to insinuate), but it is wrong to say that you should worship him, JC here, because he only came to set you free instead of worship him, in person now, as you suggest, wherein only the KJV will do for you, by your own words.

That would be like stocking your own life-house-boat only with wolves as Christian-Jew with KJV lines only to validate you as rational animal instead of the pondering naked animal now double-snared as Christian while still a Jewish 'thinker', that we call 'sinner', to be sure, as either Catholic or Jew proclaiming to be a Christian . . . wherefore then the temple ruckus is designed to say farewell to them -- and from the precinct even to never be seen in there again.

Not telling you, but suggesting only, that your choice of KJV removed the lyric line for you, which is precisely beyond which the neologic line is emergent when actualized prior-to-nature as a gift to you as logos here, first hand in you that they call 'from' the father 'in' awakening as opposite to posterior from those lines that KJV made flat, or Egypt-like, to suck you in as rational agent still.

And here we insist that something good comes out of Egypt? To this I say that Egypt is not the anti-christ per se, but the wrong direction that only stocks the Trojan horse with the enemy instead.

Just consider here that the change of vision runs from hyletic as thinker, to lyric as poet, to telic as seer, to noetic as neologically actualized from the very source of knowledge . . . for which a re-emergence is needed to consolidate (and not recuperate) the [daily] forms of the Good (the shepherds here, or insights that we have) into the Final Good that is also known as par-ousia, or Christ-mass here to end in Easter (and never mind the final round of samsara that would land you in Buddha-land as still a stranger there and never be an Arahant either).

So you are wrong before you start, as was Hitler who had a jail-house conversion [too] on his way out and dove head-first into the fire he saw before him, now to change the world around him instead of just that little blank slate that he was standing on.

It is not hard to figure out, but for which 'erectus' will always be in the way as that is also an 'attribute' of man that Aristotle called 'conditional' already in his "Categories" then.

thief of fire

...an april fools joke

Chili

Maybe, but his preamble sound pretty serious. Besides, his Errancywiki is nothing to go public with as flaunting what some readers would call ignorance.