FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-10-2007, 11:11 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default Do this in remembrance of me

Why would Jesus say that to the disciples at the Last Supper, when he had told them that he would be back with them after 3 days?

Clearly this was a ritual that was anachronistically put back into the mouth of Jesus.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:21 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Non sequitur. Can you try actually formulating a logical thought before coming to such a conclusion?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:53 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Non sequitur. Can you try actually formulating a logical thought before coming to such a conclusion?
If you told someone that you were going on a three day vacation, would you tell them to do something in remembrance of you?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:55 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Non sequitur. Can you try actually formulating a logical thought before coming to such a conclusion?
If you told someone that you were going on a three day vacation, would you tell them to do something in remembrance of you?
But Jesus isn't going on a vacation - he's going to his death. Steve Carr assumes that Jesus knows he's going to return in three days - that assumption is without merit.

Why does Steve Carr think that this one is anachronistically posited into the mouth of Jesus and not that he'll return in three days?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:05 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post

If you told someone that you were going on a three day vacation, would you tell them to do something in remembrance of you?
But Jesus isn't going on a vacation - he's going to his death. Steve Carr assumes that Jesus knows he's going to return in three days - that assumption is without merit.

Why does Steve Carr think that this one is anachronistically posited into the mouth of Jesus and not that he'll return in three days?

Which story are you reading, Chris?
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:14 AM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
If you told someone that you were going on a three day vacation, would you tell them to do something in remembrance of you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
But Jesus isn't going on a vacation - he's going to his death. Steve Carr assumes that Jesus knows he's going to return in three days - that assumption is without merit.
Consider the following Scriptures:

Matthew 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

Matthew 27:62-63 Now the next day, that followed the day of the preparation, the chief priests and Pharisees came together unto Pilate,
Saying, Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I will rise again.

Mark 8:31 And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.

Luke 24:1-8 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them. And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre. And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus. And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments: And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead? He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee, Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. And they remembered his words,

There is no doubt that the texts say that Jesus knew that he would be gone for three days. Now is it your position that Jesus knew that he would rise from the dead in three days, but did not know that he was going to return in three days?

Regarding Luke 24:1-8, I believe that it is reasonble to assume that the writer of Luke implies that it would not have made any sense for Jesus to say that he was going to rise from the dead if he did not plan to appear to anyone.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:28 AM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

But he wasn't coming back to resume his earthly life in 3 days - he was going to rise to heaven, or come back for a short period of time as in a human form before rising to heaven, whichever version you prefer. If the latter, he should have waited until then to tell people what to do in remembrance of him.

But it does sound very much like the ritual was put back into Jesus' mouth.
Toto is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:49 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic View Post

If you told someone that you were going on a three day vacation, would you tell them to do something in remembrance of you?
But Jesus isn't going on a vacation - he's going to his death. Steve Carr assumes that Jesus knows he's going to return in three days - that assumption is without merit.

Why does Steve Carr think that this one is anachronistically posited into the mouth of Jesus and not that he'll return in three days?
How does Jesus know he's going to his death? Did he know that he would be betrayed and found guilty?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 12:50 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,397
Default

or maybe everything, including Jesus's alleged mouth is just part of the story...
dog-on is offline  
Old 09-11-2007, 01:00 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Carr View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post

But Jesus isn't going on a vacation - he's going to his death. Steve Carr assumes that Jesus knows he's going to return in three days - that assumption is without merit.

Why does Steve Carr think that this one is anachronistically posited into the mouth of Jesus and not that he'll return in three days?
How does Jesus know he's going to his death? Did he know that he would be betrayed and found guilty?
In the story line of the gospels, of course he knows this. But if you are trying to extract some history from this, it doesn't appear historically credible
Toto is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:19 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.