FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-07-2004, 02:02 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default What is the Entheogenic theory of Religion?

Do you know of this theory and is it a respectable theory?

"Entheogens are plants or chemicals that produce religious experience."
Quote:
From Jonathan Ott's The Angels' Dictionary, in the volume The Age of Entheogens

Entheogen -- Plant Sacraments or shamanic inebriants evoking religious Ecstasy or vision; commonly used in the archaic world in Divination for shamanic healing, and in Holy Communion, for example during the Initiation to the Eleusinian Mysteries or the Vedic Soma sacrifice. Literally: becoming divine within. (1979 Ruck, Journal of Psychedelic Drugs 11:145. In Greek the word entheos means literally 'god (theos) within'... In combination with the Greek root -gen, which denotes the action of 'becoming,' this word results in the term that we are proposing: entheogen. 1980 Wasson: The Wondrous Mushroom, xiv ... )

Entheogen nov. verb.: 'God within us', those plant substances that, when ingested, give one a divine experience, in the past commonly called 'hallucinogens', 'psychedelics', 'psychoto-mimetics', etc etc, to each of which serious objections can be made. A group headed by the Greek scholar Carl A. P. Ruck advances 'entheogen' as fully filling the need, notably catching the rich cultural resonances evoked by the substances, many of them fungal, over vast areas of the world in proto- and prehistory.... We favor the adoption of this word. Early Man, throughout much of Eurasia and the Americas, discovered the properties of these substances and regarded them with profound respect and even awe, hedging them about with bonds of secrecy. We are now rediscovering the secret and we should treat the 'entheogens' with the respect to which they were richly entitled. As we undertake to explore their rĂ´le in the early history of religions, we should call them by a name unvulgarized by hippy abuse.

R. Gordon Wasson. The Wondrous Mushroom:
Mycolatry in Mesoamerica (NY: McGraw-Hill, 1980), xiv"
More on Entheogens Here
I also found the following passage when going through the site:

Quote:
...and now that Peter Kirby has discovered the ahistoricity of the Paul figure...
Is this true? check here
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 09-07-2004, 02:46 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
Is this true?
I did make a playful and largely incoherent post to JM on that theme, with some parallels to MJ arguments. Someone replied, asking whether I was using a reductio ad absurdum to prove 'Jesus', and I said that he could take of it what he wanted. What I take from it is that we are selective in what we choose to put under the microscope.

best,
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 09-07-2004, 05:13 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ""
Posts: 3,863
Default

Thanks for the clarification Kirby.
Ted Hoffman is offline  
Old 09-08-2004, 06:09 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

There are arguments that manna was a hallucinogenic mushroom, that the annointing oil of the ancient Hebrews contained large amounts of cannabis sativa. Certainly the Rev of John seems drug induced. Can we assume the levitical priesthood was of a shamanic nature, with ecstasy enhanced by plants? Why not explore this idea?

amanita mushroom:

http://www.egodeath.com/index.html#_...s_and_Religion

cannabis:

http://www.forbiddenfruitpublishing....kanehbosm.html
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 09-08-2004, 11:10 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
Do you know of this theory and is it a respectable theory?

"Entheogens are plants or chemicals that produce religious experience."
It is respectable among anthropologists. However, among current New Testament scholars, it is an invitation to professional suicide.

Everything we know about entheogens and Christianity is probably to be found in the famous thread Did Jesus Use Cannabis?
Toto is offline  
Old 09-08-2004, 11:15 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
It is respectable among anthropologists. However, among current New Testament scholars, it is an invitation to professional suicide.
]
Hm. And why would that be, I wonder? Biblical scholars all just say not to drugs? Pretend the native Americans had them, but somehow Middle Easterners did not? Hallucenogenic just plants did not grow in JesusLand?
/sarcasm
Magdlyn is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 07:34 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ted Hoffman
Do you know of this theory and is it a respectable theory?

"Entheogens are plants or chemicals that produce religious experience."
Like in getting born again over and over again? and whenever you sober up you lost your salvation again?

What else is there Ted? Having intercourse with the devil?
Chili is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 07:36 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
It is respectable among anthropologists. [/URL]
Yes but did Plato not think that anthropology was a science for dummies?
Chili is offline  
Old 09-09-2004, 08:17 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 451
Default

Some time during the 1960s there were books written that the experiences given by LSD users were very much like descriptions given by those who had religious experiences. The major difference was that colors were brighter in the LSD experiences. I can't cite the source now, it's been some 40 years ago. But peyote, a hallucinogenic is still being used by the Native American (Christian) church in the west.
Chuck Rightmire is offline  
Old 09-10-2004, 06:51 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Don't be rude about anthropologists! The other reason anthropology is not liked by biblically minded people is because it contains trenchant criticism of missionaries, and fascinating examples, like the cargo cults!

But beware of Castenada, it looks like he made it all up!
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.