FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2005, 06:32 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default Yahweh in the Ugaritic texts

I have often heard it mentioned that the Canaanites traditionally thought of Yahweh as being one of the sons of El, their chief god.

However, the only actual documented reference to this that I can find is El. KTU 1.1 IV 14, which is often translated as "The name of the son of god, Yahweh" but there seems to be rather severe doubts about this translation - as previous threads here have discussed.

Where else is Yahweh mentioned in the Ugaritic texts? And do any other of these texts connect him with El?
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 08:57 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Pervy:
Where else is Yahweh mentioned in the Ugaritic texts? And do any other of these texts connect him with El?
The Anchor Bible Dictionary, volume 6, page 1012, article: Yahweh, states that, "[t]he formative -yw in some personal names from Ugarit...is not a divine element and has no connection with the name Yahweh."

I think the opinion of scholars like Mark S. Smith is that Yahweh is not mentioned because Yahweh originated in the southern Levant (Judges 5 and other scriptures are cited as proof) and was conflated with the Canaanite god El, assuming some of El's and Baal's attributes. The connection of El with Yahweh comes from the Bible, in passages like Deuteronomy 32:8-9.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 11:21 AM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
I have often heard it mentioned that the Canaanites traditionally thought of Yahweh as being one of the sons of El, their chief god....Where else is Yahweh mentioned in the Ugaritic texts? And do any other of these texts connect him with El?
I have never seen indication of a Tetragrammaton type-usage anywhere other than the Hebrew Bible and writings derivative from same. However, the pronounciation of "yahweh" might have some similars in pagan cultures (Egyptian, Amorite, or Roman are allusions or references that I have seen) but "yahweh" is a dubious pronounciation of the Hebrew (which I completely reject :-)

Shalom,
Praxeas
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Messianic_Apologetic/
Steven Avery is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 11:38 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
I have often heard it mentioned that the Canaanites traditionally thought of Yahweh as being one of the sons of El, their chief god.
I’m no expert but I’ve done a lot of reading on this subject, and it looks to me like the “Canaanites� and the “Ancient Hebrews� were one and the same. The archeologists and theologians who study this can’t find anything significant to differentiate between the two. It’s like being English and British.

CANAANITES = ANCIENT HEBREWS

Apparently they were the same people. They lived in the same place, spoke the same language, did the same things, and worshipped the same gods.

Google [Canaanites “ancient Hebrews�] and you will see what I mean. Here’s a quickie from Religious Tolerance: Archeology and the Hebrew Scriptures

Quote:
The archeological record shows that, in many cases, cities mentioned in Joshua did not exist when the Israelite invasion was supposed to have happened. In most of the other locations, there were no signs of destruction as described in the Bible. There is a growing belief among archeologists that neither the Judges nor the Joshua biblical stories is true. Rather, the Israelites developed from what some call proto-Israelites who "...started out as indigenous Canaanites," already in Canaan. 2 In other words, the ancient Israelites started as a sub-culture within Canaan; they did not attack Canaan from outside.
Loomis is offline  
Old 06-07-2005, 12:21 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
Where else is Yahweh mentioned in the Ugaritic texts? And do any other of these texts connect him with El?
Yahweh is not in the Ugaritic texts. But apparently many of the Psalms in the OT that are attributed to Yahweh were originally attributed to El. In most cases it was as simple as replacing the word “El� with the word “Yahweh.�

They did the same thing with Baal. They took out “Baal� and inserted “Yahweh.�

The god on the dollar bill is a direct descendent of the gods at Ugarit, but it looks like Yahweh was a foreign god who got assimilated later. If you read the OT carefully it is quite a mind fuck. The various authors of the various verses tried to merge Yahweh with El in contradicting and incompatible ways. For example:

  • Yahweh is the only god. El is a bad evil god. (2nd Isaiah – strict Yahwism)

  • El is the most high god. Gosh, who is Yahweh? (polytheistic El-worship absent of Yahwism)

  • El is the only god. Yahweh and the other sons of El are evil horseshit. (El monotheism at Psalm 82)

  • Yahweh is one of El’s sons, assigned to watch over the nation of Jacob.

  • Yahweh is a messenger god from El or Baal. (“The Angel of the LORDâ€? = “the messenger Yahweh.â€? - as Gupan was to Baal)
The stories and religious viewpoints expressed in the OT are not the product of a unified theology. Don’t let anyone fool you. The various authors did not agree on who or what God was.

Fyi, Ugarit is named after Ugar, another messenger of Baal.
Loomis is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 07:23 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default Yahweh's Origin

I'll expand on my previous post about Yahweh's origin. I now quote from John Day's Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan, p. 15:

Quote:
Since Yahweh and El were originally separate deities, the question is raised where Yahweh originated. Yahweh himself does not appear to have been a Canaanite god in origin: for example, he does not appear in the Ugaritic pantheon lists. Most scholars who have written on the subject in recent decades support the idea that Yahweh had his origins outside the land of Israel to the south, in the area of Midian (cf. Judg. 5.4-5; Deut. 33.2; Hab. 3.3,7) and there has been an increasing tendency to locate Mt Sinai and Kadesh in N.W. Arabia rather than the Sinai peninsula itself.
Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, article: El, page 385, says this:

Quote:
...at various points and under different circumstances Israelite religious centers based in the central highlands identified Yahweh, the god of the southern region, with their local main god, El. In identifying Yahweh secondarily with El, the priesthood at cultic sites of El, such as Shiloh, Schechem, and Jerusalem, melded the religious lore of Yahweh with the indigenous traditions about El. It is for this reason that the Hebrew Bible so rarely distinguishes between El and Yahweh or offers polemics against El.
As scholars have pointed out, Exodus 6:2-3 is an attempt to claim that Yahweh and El were really the same god all along--just a name change occurred.
John Kesler is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 08:19 PM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: US Citizen (edited)
Posts: 1,948
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
I have often heard it mentioned that the Canaanites traditionally thought of Yahweh as being one of the sons of El, their chief god.

However, the only actual documented reference to this that I can find is El. KTU 1.1 IV 14, which is often translated as "The name of the son of god, Yahweh" but there seems to be rather severe doubts about this translation - as previous threads here have discussed.

Where else is Yahweh mentioned in the Ugaritic texts? And do any other of these texts connect him with El?
YHVH is a set of four consonants and nobody knows for sure how the Hebrews pronounced the word, which is primarily a vocative or invocation word. The nominative case -- the name of the god -- is Y, which has to be filled with a wowel. Hence the transcriptions: Yo, Ya, Yaw, Ye [as in Yeshua, as the Greeks heard it: Yesos, or Latin Yesus but spelled Jesus].

It is possible that in Canaan they considered Ya or Yahweh one of the sons of the Elohim [the supreme Gods]. Genesis-1 is the creation story of the Elohim; Genesis-2 is the creation story of Yahweh or "Yahveh elohim" -- the divine Yaw. In view of the two distinct creation stories, one has to doubt that the Canaanites [Hebrews included] considered Yaw a son of the Elohim. The Ebla tablets (deciphered by Pettinato) have a reference to Yawveh, to Jerusalem, and to some other Biblical terms long before the Hebrew tribe separated from Canaan (after the Tower of Babel incident) and constructed their own religion.

Yahveh must be a Levantine deity prior to the Arabian influx that formed Canaan [with El or The-god: al-Elah, Allah; and with Semitic or proto-Arabic], and, later on, Akkad and Babylonia. Prior to this pre-historic influx, the Levant had, we might say, a Graeco-Sumerian language and Gentile Gods such as Yahveh or Yohveh (spelled Jove in Latin) and many others.

Y [yah; yoh] corresponds to the Latin YO-us (spelled Jous -- attested), later contracted into JUS (which means "Right"). Normally the deity is called Jus-pater or Juppiter [the father of righteousness].

As I see it, the Canaanites, whose Elohim is the presursor of the later Biblical El, invoked by Jesus on the cross, and of the Arabian Allah, absorbed the older local regions and made Yah a son of the Elohim. The Hebrews kept the deities distinct, but after the experience with the Egyptian monotheism, they constantly confused EL [wifeless and childless] with Yah. Moses gave his people the commandment that there shall be no god before the one he sponsored (namely Yah), and that was that, until the kingdom of Isra-EL separated from the kingdom of Judah whose Yah had the temple in Jerusalem.
Jesus, a Galilean, stuck to El. The ministers of El are Micha-El, Satana-El, Gabri-El, and others, who have nothing to do with Yahveh. His auto-biographical information is revealing, too: It was Satan that tempted Jesus. So much for the Arab-culture side of the Jews.
Amedeo is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 08:33 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis
It’s like being English and British. CANAANITES = ANCIENT HEBREWS
Ah, the No True Scotsman argument.

English and British are not equal: English is a subset of British, British is comprised of much more than just the English.
Wallener is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:02 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The recesses of Zaphon
Posts: 969
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallener
Ah, the No True Scotsman argument.

English and British are not equal: English is a subset of British, British is comprised of much more than just the English.
Fine. How’s this:

Hebrew is to Canaanite as English is to British?

My point being that the only difference between a vintage Israelite and a Canaanite may be that the Canaanites are those who did not assimilate Yahweh into their pantheon, and then ultimately go monotheistic.
Loomis is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:16 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loomis
Hebrew is to Canaanite as English is to British?
Possibly. I think Scottish to Welsh might be better, but at that point we're splitting hairs.
Wallener is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.