Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Rational BAC · 08-09-2003, 02:15 PM

Long thread already on this. But let us get back to basics.

Does anyone think that the Jews are responsible for the crucifixion of Christ? Shouldn't we blame the Romans? Should we blame anyone at all?, --------since His death and resurrection were foreordained.--------destined to be and all that.

In other words, how can any depiction (no matter how gross) of the death of Christ be essentially anti-Semitic? Not to me anyway. I consider it more anti-Roman than anything. Didn't the Romans invent crucifixion? Didn't Pontius Pilate have the final say?

And wasn't Jesus Jewish?

And isn't it that what will probably bother most people in this movie will be the graphic portrayal of a Roman crucifixion?

I can be as anti-Roman as anybody else.

Doctor X · 08-09-2003, 04:11 PM

Since no historical evidence exists to solve the problem:

Quote:

The police are having interviews for new recruits. After hours, the Chief gets impatient--and a bit silly--winking at his aid he asks one applicant:

"Tell me, who killed Jesus?"

The Italian applicant responds without hesitation, "the Jews!"

When with a Jewish applicant, the Chief decides to repeat his "joke." The Jew responds immediately, "the Romans!"

Finally, the Chief has a Polish applicant. He asks the same question. The applicant thinks . . . and thinks . . . and thinks.

The Chief raises his eyebrows at his aid and says, seriously, "Well, why don't you think about it and get back to us."

Later that night the Polish applicant's wife asks how his interview went.

"Great!" he replies, "I'm on my first murder case!"

I suppose scholars can think "what ifs" until the bovines return to their domiciles. The Synoptics and Jn preserve polemic and depictions based on them perpetuate the polemic.

--J. "Half Polish" D.

Toto · 08-10-2003, 01:11 AM

You can't make a logical case for blaming the Jews for Jesus' death. But that hasn't stopped countless European peasants from accusing their Jewish neighbors of Deicide and slaughtering them.

If you want a serious scholarly discussion, I can recommend Crossan's Who Killed Jesus and Leidner's The Fabrication of the Christ Myth. Both conclude that the gospel accounts of the Passion are so clearly literary works that it is impossible to separate out any real history.

Primordial Groove · 08-10-2003, 06:06 AM

With no background in theological studies I would say that the Jewish religious leaders were responsible for his death. Jesus managed to piss them off enough to get his arse crucified, didnt he?

Grumpy · 08-10-2003, 09:44 AM

If The Passion succeeds in its evangelical intent, viewers will be overjoyed, not infuriated, to see Jesus hoisted up on the cross. The question should be, who gets the credit for killing Jesus.

Apparently, the sight of Jesus soaking in blood has been an uplifting image for some early viewers of the film.

Frankly, I still don't understand the logic of "he sacrificed himself." He was arrested, allegedly through treachery, and accused of crimes, i.e. blasphemy, that he did in fact commit, though the Gospels don't consider that a crime. Because he could have resisted with "legions of angels," according to Matthew, but didn't, that's supposed to be a selfless act?

Putting that on film turns it into a mere plot hole, like the magical computer virus in Independence Day.

Toto · 08-10-2003, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Primordial Groove
With no background in theological studies I would say that the Jewish religious leaders were responsible for his death. Jesus managed to piss them off enough to get his arse crucified, didnt he?

No.

That is the plot of the fictional tales known as the gospels. But it can't stand up to any sort of scrutiny.

Sarpedon · 08-10-2003, 12:08 PM

I find the problem of who killed Jesus somewhat less interesting than the problem of who killed Mr Boddy.

Jah191 · 08-10-2003, 01:36 PM

Everyone knows it was the butler with the candlestick in the kitchen.

Marduk · 08-10-2003, 03:59 PM

�With no background in theological studies I would say that the Jewish religious leaders were responsible for his death. Jesus managed to piss them off enough to get his arse crucified, didnt he?�

True, but the Jewish punishment for blasphemy was being stoned to death. Jerusalem was under Roman control & law, no one farted without the approval of Rome, he was convicted (if the story is historical anyway) of treason against Rome and killed by a Roman method by Roman agents.

Doctor X · 08-10-2003, 04:41 PM

My money is still on Miss Scarlet, in the kitchen, with a revolver. . . .

--J.D.

08-09-2003, 02:15 PM	#1
Rational BAC Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Tampa Bay area Posts: 3,471	Let's cut to the chase on Gibson's film. Long thread already on this. But let us get back to basics. Does anyone think that the Jews are responsible for the crucifixion of Christ? Shouldn't we blame the Romans? Should we blame anyone at all?, --------since His death and resurrection were foreordained.--------destined to be and all that. In other words, how can any depiction (no matter how gross) of the death of Christ be essentially anti-Semitic? Not to me anyway. I consider it more anti-Roman than anything. Didn't the Romans invent crucifixion? Didn't Pontius Pilate have the final say? And wasn't Jesus Jewish? And isn't it that what will probably bother most people in this movie will be the graphic portrayal of a Roman crucifixion? I can be as anti-Roman as anybody else.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

08-10-2003, 01:11 AM	#3
Toto Contributor Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Los Angeles area Posts: 40,549	You can't make a logical case for blaming the Jews for Jesus' death. But that hasn't stopped countless European peasants from accusing their Jewish neighbors of Deicide and slaughtering them. If you want a serious scholarly discussion, I can recommend Crossan's Who Killed Jesus and Leidner's The Fabrication of the Christ Myth. Both conclude that the gospel accounts of the Passion are so clearly literary works that it is impossible to separate out any real history.

08-10-2003, 06:06 AM	#4
Primordial Groove Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Earth Posts: 1,570	With no background in theological studies I would say that the Jewish religious leaders were responsible for his death. Jesus managed to piss them off enough to get his arse crucified, didnt he?

08-10-2003, 09:44 AM	#5
Grumpy Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Alaska, USA Posts: 1,535	If The Passion succeeds in its evangelical intent, viewers will be overjoyed, not infuriated, to see Jesus hoisted up on the cross. The question should be, who gets the credit for killing Jesus. Apparently, the sight of Jesus soaking in blood has been an uplifting image for some early viewers of the film. Frankly, I still don't understand the logic of "he sacrificed himself." He was arrested, allegedly through treachery, and accused of crimes, i.e. blasphemy, that he did in fact commit, though the Gospels don't consider that a crime. Because he could have resisted with "legions of angels," according to Matthew, but didn't, that's supposed to be a selfless act? Putting that on film turns it into a mere plot hole, like the magical computer virus in Independence Day.

08-10-2003, 12:08 PM	#7
Sarpedon Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le Posts: 8,446	I find the problem of who killed Jesus somewhat less interesting than the problem of who killed Mr Boddy.

08-10-2003, 01:36 PM	#8
Jah191 Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: USA Posts: 24	Everyone knows it was the butler with the candlestick in the kitchen.

08-10-2003, 03:59 PM	#9
Marduk Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: the 10th planet Posts: 5,065	�With no background in theological studies I would say that the Jewish religious leaders were responsible for his death. Jesus managed to piss them off enough to get his arse crucified, didnt he?� True, but the Jewish punishment for blasphemy was being stoned to death. Jerusalem was under Roman control & law, no one farted without the approval of Rome, he was convicted (if the story is historical anyway) of treason against Rome and killed by a Roman method by Roman agents.

08-10-2003, 04:41 PM	#10
Doctor X Banned Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: USA Posts: 3,794	My money is still on Miss Scarlet, in the kitchen, with a revolver. . . . --J.D.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.