FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2007, 01:07 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default Pope condemns search for historical Jesus

The pontiff's new book is a 'personal search for the face of the Lord.'

Quote:
In the 448-page tome, Benedict takes on half a century of revisionist scholars who he believes threaten the Roman Catholic faith by distorting the true nature of Christ as both man and God. He calls on readers to reacquaint themselves with "the real Jesus," the Jesus presented in the Gospels.

None of this postmodern nonsense, he writes, that regards Jesus as something less than divine. Introducing doubts undercuts the essence of Christianity, the pope says.
I think this is not a question of post modernism, but of modernism. Modernists reject the divinity of Jesus.

Quote:
In presenting the book during Friday's ceremony, Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, the archbishop of Vienna and a close associate of the pope, was more blunt in attacking what he called "innumerable fanciful images" of Jesus. "They can be calmly deposited in the ossuary of history," Schoenborn said.

...

The work is not, he insists, official church doctrine, nor an infallible pronouncement.

"So," he writes, "everyone is free to contradict me."

Citing hundreds of biblical passages and quoting a range of figures, from Marx and Nietzsche to contemporary cardinals and Jewish scholars, Benedict has produced a text that is highly academic and befitting of his years as both a university professor and the Vatican's chief theologian and enforcer of dogma.

...
available on Amazon (or via: amazon.co.uk) May 15.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 01:57 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

So the pope is hardline...what's new?
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:01 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

It is ironic that the 'real Jesus' is the 'mythical Jesus'
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:03 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,190
Default

Quote:
The work is not, he insists, official church doctrine, nor an infallible pronouncement.

"So," he writes, "everyone is free to contradict me."
So if it had been regarded by the Catholic church as an infallible pronouncement, would critics have been killed or imprisoned by his private army?
SwoleMan is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:08 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It is ironic that the 'real Jesus' is the 'mythical Jesus'
No, but it's ironic that you're still clueless that the "real Jesus" isn't the "mythical Jesus" but you think it's ironic that others feel the same way.

Simpliciter ut hilare.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SwoleMan View Post
So if it had been regarded by the Catholic church as an infallible pronouncement, would critics have been killed or imprisoned by his private army?
Neither.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:13 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Excuse me, the Pope has explicitly rejected all versions of Jesus except the fully god fully man one.

That one - by definition a hybrid - is also by definition mythical - unless god exists.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:16 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
Neither.
No, of course not. I was being sarcastic.
SwoleMan is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:33 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
No, but it's ironic that you're still clueless that the "real Jesus" isn't the "mythical Jesus" but you think it's ironic that others feel the same way.
So what is Jesus, Chris? You only know what he isn't?
aa5874 is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:43 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Posts: 7,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer View Post
No, but it's ironic that you're still clueless that the "real Jesus" isn't the "mythical Jesus" but you think it's ironic that others feel the same way.....Simpliciter ut hilare.....Neither.
I have no idea why someone who claims to be an atheist would react to those particulary innofensive, sarcastic posts in such an antagonistic manner... Unless he was unnable to understand them...:huh:
figuer is offline  
Old 04-14-2007, 02:43 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
half a century of revisionist scholars
I thought it was nearer 400 years.

Actually, arguments about the nature of Jesus go back to the beginnings - is the son begotten for example.
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.