FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Elsewhere > ~Elsewhere~
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2005, 11:42 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
Certainly, the important point is that women were definitely regarded as being inferior.
No, they were superior because the woman is the soul of man . . . but you can't be man if you are the soul of man. This goes back to Gen.2 where woman was taken from man and later saw that the TOK was good for gaining wisdom food and beauty to be the storehouse of his wisdom and beauty.

You are confusing females with woman. In this argument woman is opposite to human and since females are both human and woman they are equal to males to the varying degree of humanity and womanity they display. Since our human nature is our sin nature, females, who are less human than males are more woman than males and are therefore better than males in this respect. The point here is that with our human eyes we see things backwards.

The reason they are/were not allowed to speak from the pulpit is because woman does not need redemption but must find salvation through nihilation of the human nature since she already is the soul of man. Mystical intimacy is the heaven of females as opposed to crucifixion and annihilation for males (down with Asher Lev).
Chili is offline  
Old 04-08-2005, 12:07 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili
You are confusing females with woman.
Very true. I do that every day.
John A. Broussard is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.