FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

View Poll Results: Would you publish? Yes or No?
Theist for 4 4.76%
Theist against 0 0%
Agnostic for 8 9.52%
Agnostic against 0 0%
Atheist for 69 82.14%
Atheist against 0 0%
Muslim for 1 1.19%
Muslim against 0 0%
Pagan for 1 1.19%
Pagan against 0 0%
Other for 1 1.19%
Other against 0 0%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-27-2008, 04:02 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On the wing, waiting for a kick
Posts: 2,558
Default Would you publish?

Imagine you are the boss of an archaelogical dig in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt. One day is found in a tomb a carving that gives an Egyption account of the Israeli exodus from Egypt. While the carving does not mention the peoples' name it notes their leader spoke Egyptian well and was obviously familar with Egyption life & culture. He insisted that these people must be released or great disasters would fall upon the land of Egypt. It also mentions terrible calamites that befell Egypt which line up with what the OT describes including the death of all 1st born of Egypt. Pharoah says go but changes his mind and sends out an army. The army never returns, except for a few stragglers who describe a large wave that washed away the army but missed those people.
You have on your team agnostics, atheists, a Jew but no Christians. Do you publish? Yes or No? The discussion was vigorous.
I ask this because I have used this scenario for > 20 years now as a straw poll for people's willingness to publish information that might upset their cherished beliefs. My sample size has been rather small so I am opening it to all of you.
My results have been as follows
Agnostics - For: 20%
Against: 80%
Atheists - For: 50%
Against: 50%
Jews - For: 50%
Against: 50%
Christians - For: 99%
Against: 1%
I have no figures for pagans or muslims as yet.
Some explantions. The 1% Christian against was from a fellow who thought that the fuss was not worth the effort. I have great admiration for the atheists would are prepared to publish. When I asked some agnostics why they would not publish they replied that that would force them to take sides and they prefered not to do that.
I am wondering if the results from you all will follow the trends I have noticed or will vary.
So what say you? Publish or not? Please give reasons for your answer if you wish.
Tigers! is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 04:12 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: auckland nz
Posts: 18,090
Default

atheist - for.


I would publish - it's a no brainder really.
My beleif system is founded upon evidence - if I see new evidence then I see no problem in changing my belief system.

However, I don't think this would be substantial evidence for christianity (or any other religion), just that the story in the bible was probably closer to the truth than previously thought.
we know that some of the stories in the bible do have some factual basis that has since been changed to myth over multiple retellings and retranslations, this is no different really.
The big question should be, why wouldn't you publish? I think refusing to publish something because it goes against your beliefs is incredibly unprofessional and you don't deserve to be a scientist if that is the case.

quite frnakly I am more than a little surprised that 50% of atheists wouldn't publish.
NZSkep is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 04:20 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England, 51st state of the USA
Posts: 2,276
Default

No question about it, of course I'd publish.

We don't know 0.000001% recurring about the universe, so on the grand scale of things, this isn't really going to upset the equilibrium of beliefs in my head.

Anyone so certain about their beliefs as to withhold publication of new evidence has got issues.
Sigma is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 04:23 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On the wing, waiting for a kick
Posts: 2,558
Default

A question for the mods (or another person). Is it possible to have this poll (mine) changed so that it would display the nifty bar graph? I wanted that but obviously hit the wrong key or missed the right one.
Tigers! is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 04:42 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Of course you publish. Any information should be published.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 04:50 AM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: auckland nz
Posts: 18,090
Default

furether to my previous post, you say this is a streaw poll to see how likely people are to publish info that goes against their beliefs. If so, why are you asking christians? Surely this info serves to reinforce their beliefs if anything?

A better question to ask christians is whether they would publish info evidence that contradicts, say, the resurection.
NZSkep is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 07:38 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shores of the utmost west UK
Posts: 49
Default

Another atheist-for.

It would be a fascinating find that should definitely be published. Perhaps it would cause some scholars to look again at the historical value of the book of Exodus. It wouldn't challenge any cherished belief of mine, though. I think that that Exodus from Egypt is unlikely to have happened, based on the current lack of archaelogical evidence for it. However, my atheistic view is not based on the lack of Exodus (although the two are consistent), so even if the Exodus did occur I would probably still be an atheist. I would need some evidence that God(s) was(were) directly responsible for the actions described in the tablet before I began to change my own stance.

Best wishes,
Matthew
matthewthomas is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 09:14 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lethbridge AB Canada
Posts: 445
Default

If you found it you must publish it. I think the real question would be is how one would handle the issue of whether the text is a forgery or not!
DrJim is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 09:20 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,808
Default

Since the question is hypothetical I answered based on the assumption that the tomb was real.

Of course such a find should be published. Even a non slam-dunk finding should be published and studied...such as a reference to Hebrew slaves in Egypt....at any time.
Minimalist is offline  
Old 01-27-2008, 02:56 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Definitely "for".
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.