FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2005, 10:20 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: california
Posts: 11
Default ADAM & EVE ?

In the beginning blah blah blah................
God created adam & eve and
my question is, if God created adam and eve they had a babys i think then how did they get grand kids? Did their kids had forbiden sex with each other?
deltin7 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 01:48 AM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: (GSV) Lasting Damage
Posts: 10,734
Default

more BC&H I think.

Jet Black
Jet Black is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 01:59 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lousyana (but I'd rather be in New Zealand!)
Posts: 944
Default

Why do you have to ask such pesky questions! -- Why don't you just shut up & have faith?

But seriously: You know, I wondered about that when I was in the very literalist Church of Christ years ago. I never asked anyone however (maybe back then I didn't want add to my already growing doubts). I don't recall any fundy response to this problem.

J
THX1138 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 03:50 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 1,224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THX1138
Why do you have to ask such pesky questions! -- Why don't you just shut up & have faith?

But seriously: You know, I wondered about that when I was in the very literalist Church of Christ years ago. I never asked anyone however (maybe back then I didn't want add to my already growing doubts). I don't recall any fundy response to this problem.

J
JM: Well Kent Hovind said they (the men) had sex with their sisters because the gene pool was still near perfect after the fall and God had not yet forbade it. All this based on a literal reading of the KING JAMES version of course.

Cheers

Joe Meert
Joe Meert is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 04:24 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lousyana (but I'd rather be in New Zealand!)
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Meert
JM: Well Kent Hovind said they (the men) had sex with their sisters because the gene pool was still near perfect after the fall and God had not yet forbade it. All this based on a literal reading of the KING JAMES version of course.

Cheers

Joe Meert
Of course, by that logic, there was a LOT one could do before God said "don't do X." Murder must've been kosher to?? That's pretty fucked up, but then again, why should we be surprised!

J
THX1138 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 06:48 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,127
Default

Don't forget Eve was also Adam's clone - so not only must they have had perfect genes - they would have had identical genes. Imagine that - the first woman a transexual Don't the fundies have a problem with same sex couplings?
Monad is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 06:51 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lousyana (but I'd rather be in New Zealand!)
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monad
Don't forget Eve was also Adam's clone - so not only must they have had perfect genes - they would have had identical genes. Imagine that - the first woman a transexual Don't the fundies have a problem with same sex couplings?


J
THX1138 is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 07:34 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
Post opposite-sex cloning

Quote:
Monad:
Don't forget Eve was also Adam's clone - so not only must they have had perfect genes - they would have had identical genes. Imagine that - the first woman a transexual Don't the fundies have a problem with same sex couplings?
Nah, God just dropped the "Y" chromosome and doubled the "X" chromosome. I have to say, it would be interesting to see an opposite-sex version of yourself. Weird for sure.

Peez
Peez is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 07:39 AM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THX1138
Of course, by that logic, there was a LOT one could do before God said "don't do X." Murder must've been kosher to??
Well, God did personally intervene to stop anyone punishing Cain for Abel's murder...
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 03-07-2005, 07:43 AM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Meert
JM: Well Kent Hovind said they (the men) had sex with their sisters because the gene pool was still near perfect after the fall and God had not yet forbade it. All this based on a literal reading of the KING JAMES version of course.

Cheers

Joe Meert
Has anyone worked out what effect this would have on the gene pool now? I mean can you get from Cane and Able having children with their sister (s) ( are they named?) to our current gene pool? Do the creationists have to posit very fast micro evolution, especially with a bottle neck with Noah?
Clivedurdle is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.