FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2008, 10:46 AM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: S. Canada
Posts: 1,252
Default Who's Rook Hawkins?

Hello,

A while ago, I bumped into this link:
http://www.rationalresponders.com/

I scrolled down and found a video. In this video, there was a gentleman named Rook Hawkins giving a speech on jesus mythicism. Hawkins was introduced as a "historian" and that his work is undergoing peer review. He also speaks as if he is part of "scholarship". Yet, I searched and found no information on him as a historian or even as an author with any academic credentials. Who's Hawkins?
Adonael is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 01:44 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Rook Hawkins is an atheist activist. He has not yet established his credentials as a professional historian qualified to teach in a university AFAIK.

I don't keep up the the RRS but there is an entry here which might explain more:

Jesus Mythicism Revised
Quote:
About a year and a half ago, I started a campaign to educate people about Jesus mythicism. When I had first started working on the campaign I was not as well prepared as I am now. I have to chalk that up to inexperience. When somebody says “a lot can happen in a year”, I will consider what they have to say, because they aren’t kidding. A lot has happened in a year and a half that I felt a revision of this article was a necessity.

Among the new avenues I have taken is a complete refocusing of my book, a project that has been a very huge learning experience, and I owe a large debt of gratitude to my mentor, colleague and friend, Thomas L. Thompson, who has been in no small way an influence on me personally and my research. Richard Carrier and Robert M. Price have also stepped in to give me some really important advice and critiques that have also shaped how I see the past. My debts also include Joseph B. Tyson, who has offered some criticisms as well as kindness and friendship, and to minimalists everywhere who have said in a loud voice, “We will not submit to assumption and speculation.” It is their mighty tombs and impressively large shadows that I walk behind. Without their unending sacrifice to keep scholarship in check, the world would still be shrouded in an age of darkness and death that ended with the success of the redaction schools of Germany and the glorious Enlightenment that help shaped western culture....
There is a long thread on the Richard Dawkins forum on Rook's credentials, in which he participates. No need to replicate that here, thank you.

Do you want to discuss Rook Hawkins or his particular theories of Jesus Mythicism? If the former, this is the wrong forum. If you just want to discuss Jesus Mythicism, we already have many threads on that.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 09:56 PM   #3
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: S. Canada
Posts: 1,252
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Rook Hawkins is an atheist activist. He has not yet established his credentials as a professional historian qualified to teach in a university AFAIK.

I don't keep up the the RRS but there is an entry here which might explain more:

Jesus Mythicism Revised
Quote:
About a year and a half ago, I started a campaign to educate people about Jesus mythicism. When I had first started working on the campaign I was not as well prepared as I am now. I have to chalk that up to inexperience. When somebody says “a lot can happen in a year”, I will consider what they have to say, because they aren’t kidding. A lot has happened in a year and a half that I felt a revision of this article was a necessity.

Among the new avenues I have taken is a complete refocusing of my book, a project that has been a very huge learning experience, and I owe a large debt of gratitude to my mentor, colleague and friend, Thomas L. Thompson, who has been in no small way an influence on me personally and my research. Richard Carrier and Robert M. Price have also stepped in to give me some really important advice and critiques that have also shaped how I see the past. My debts also include Joseph B. Tyson, who has offered some criticisms as well as kindness and friendship, and to minimalists everywhere who have said in a loud voice, “We will not submit to assumption and speculation.” It is their mighty tombs and impressively large shadows that I walk behind. Without their unending sacrifice to keep scholarship in check, the world would still be shrouded in an age of darkness and death that ended with the success of the redaction schools of Germany and the glorious Enlightenment that help shaped western culture....
There is a long thread on the Richard Dawkins forum on Rook's credentials, in which he participates. No need to replicate that here, thank you.

Do you want to discuss Rook Hawkins or his particular theories of Jesus Mythicism? If the former, this is the wrong forum. If you just want to discuss Jesus Mythicism, we already have many threads on that.
Can I discuss rook's credentials or arguments as they relate to jesus mythicism?
Adonael is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 10:09 PM   #4
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

You can discuss any arguments which are unique to Rook or especially well made by him (credentials aren't so important. An argument either holds up or it doesn't).
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 10:09 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rook Hawkins
Under his “Research” category, he lists the need to be proficient at “several semitic languages, Koine Greek, and Latin. (sic!)” I don’t know many scholars who hold so many proficiency certificates in all of those languages. With the exception of Bart Ehrman, who is a textual critic (so his job is to specifically deal with all these languages), I can not think of many scholars who would fit this criteria.
Wow. Just wow. I can name a dozen without blinking. And how many Semitic languages does Bart Ehrman know? While I think the qualification is a bit skewed, if this "Rook Hawkins" fellow doesn't know anyone but Bart Ehrman who has those qualifications, then he doesn't know any scholars at all! More importantly, what scholars don't know the original languages of the culture they're dealing with?

I wander what degree he holds in what fields? I don't know much about him, and frankly, that he already professes so much ignorance and associates himself with the laughable "Rational Response Squad" (the most irrational of any atheist group I've seen thus far), then I seriously doubt his competence in any sort of field.
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 10:10 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ירושלים
Posts: 1,701
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
You can discuss any arguments which are unique to Rook or especially well made by him (credentials aren't so important. An argument either holds up or it doesn't).
I disagree. If you are incompetent in understanding the argument, who would you rather believe, the person with the most credentials or the person with no credentials?
Solitary Man is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 11:11 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern United States
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solitary Man View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
You can discuss any arguments which are unique to Rook or especially well made by him (credentials aren't so important. An argument either holds up or it doesn't).
I disagree. If you are incompetent in understanding the argument, who would you rather believe, the person with the most credentials or the person with no credentials?
If you do not understand the argument maybe you should not take sides in it.
Manwe is offline  
Old 05-19-2008, 11:18 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The Jesus Myth Theory does not depend on Rook Hawkins' credentials, so his credentials are not especially relevant here.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 12:21 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The Jesus Myth Theory does not depend on Rook Hawkins' credentials, so his credentials are not especially relevant here.
The topic was who Hawkins was, considering he's presenting himself on the net, his radio show and anywhere else he can get an audience as an "Ancient Texts Expert" who has things to say about how Jesus never existed. His qualifications are pretty relevant to that issue.

And to answer the question - he has none. He's an amateur hobbyist with a High School diploma. He'd do himself and his fervent cause a great deal of good if he stopped pretending to be something he isn't and simply admitted that he's a keen amateur when it comes to history and a committed polemicist when it comes to atheism, rationalism and the JM hypothesis.
Antipope Innocent II is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 12:47 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

There is a good thread on the RRS board where Rook discusses his credentials. It's 3 pages long, and raises questions on what the term "historian" means, and when does it apply? Rook argues that he qualifies as a "historian":
http://www.rationalresponders.com/reply_troll
GakuseiDon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.