FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2005, 09:13 AM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
The wise men brought gold frankincense and myrrh. The land of punt may be in Ethiopia or Somalia - puntland is an area of Somalia today. This is a major clue to how extensive the trade routes were.

We have extensive trade with intermediaries - the Egyptians knew about things down to Aden, but not beyond - Arab sailors knew both sides.

It sounds like a huge game of chinese whispers, ideas and stories as well as elephants and silk were traded, and as with all good stories, get expanded.

I like the concept of gestalt - foreground and background. The idea of the death and resurrection of Christ to save the world is a classic idea of detail, focussing on one point in history. The snag is that it overwhelms the background, the context, the relationships. We haven't worked out the relationships properly because we are still too blinded (like Paul?) by the central idea of the cross and resurrection. We are focussing on Jesus - history or myth, when we should be looking at the many clues about what was really happening in the world around.

Are there major studies of sea trade and the spread of ideas and religions?
Actually, the major Indic presence in the middle east were the Mitanni (1500-1200 bce) who ruled a vast empire in the middle east and was the same place where many NUZI laws mentioned in the story of Abraham came from. Also the Indo-Aryans of this branch (who mention Indian Vedic Gods and NOT Iranian Gods) had several daughters married to the Pharoah -- and we must remember that the Torah is also called the "Five Books of Moses" and Moses was a foreign prince in the Egyptian court. So the story of Abraham and the patriarchs is closely associated with the Indians once more...too many coincidences... and oh, yes...Aramaic (to which Hebrew is related) is eventually descended from this hurrian/mitanni branch of people...:huh:

Unfortuneatly, not too much is known about the Mitanni, they were also important in introducing chariot warfare in the middle east. So during 1500 bce they introduced chariot warfare, and 300 bce they introduced elephant warfare to the middle east.
Dharma is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 01:11 PM   #62
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 1
Question A slippery slope from one brass buddha in Norway, to buddhists in the Americas

Quote:
Originally Posted by yummyfur
Unfortunatly the paper you referenced is not footnoted, so we have no idea where the author is getting their information. Considering that the Vikings had a regular excursion to the Caspian Sea area and beyond for a period, is it suprising to find a brass buddha, it's hardly proof of buddhist missionaries being in Scandanavia, especially since there is only one. It seems much more likely this was gained in trade or raid in and around the Caspian Sea or Persia.

I must agree that the finding of a brass Buddha in Norway does not connote Buddhism there, but does refer more to trade. The paper that you are referring to was about trade, not religion. The footnote you are looking for was available from the author, had you asked this being me. One of many of those footnotes is from The Vikings! by Magnus Magnusson, p. 17. It does not say anything about the religion being in Norway but discusses various trade routes and the Buddha being proof of extensive trade.

“the overland trade route that ran through Samarkand and Tashkent to China, and here a great market place had developed controlled by the Bulgar tribes.�[1] Smolensk, like Bulgar, formed a cultural crossroads, where East and West met to trade furs, slaves, silk, honey, ivory, spices, and a plethora of other goods and wares, all of which moved along the waterways.[2]

The waterways that pass through Russia provided a means of transportation and linkages into the political and social structures of the areas. The Swedish Vikings had to secure these waterways in order to control Near Eastern and Mediterranean trade. The waterways allowed many Vikings to reach distant lands as far as Baghdad, carrying trade goods and luxury items. Items found in graves in Scandinavia have included Indian coins from the sixth or seventh century,[3] a brass Buddha, silks, and glass, indicating the far-reaching territories with which trade was accomplished and thus the distances traveled. These items were collected on extended trading expeditions, and it is not unreasonable to infer that others of like kind may have been dispersed along the trade route.

William of Rubeck, a Franciscan missionary in the thirteenth century, mentioned Turkish merchants who trafficked in Russia bringing out ermine and grey-squirrel skins, while those going into Russia took cotton clothes, silks, and spices.[4] “Ships also came to the mouth of the Dnieper to buy dried fish,�[5] he wrote, thus showing, even at that late date, just how crucial the Russian passageways were to trade with the Orient and Byzantium. The Byzantine-Rus treaty of 911, which realized a special treaty of fishery use rights at the mouth of the Dnieper for the Rus, illustrates the kind of economic interactions that were occurring locally. Hence, the political and economic stability of Russia was of vast importance to the Vikings (particularly the Swedes), as well as the Byzantines. Accordingly, the Scandinavians established settlements in strategic locations and created trade, and subjugated or negotiated with the native populations to insure trade stability.

Footnotes:
[1]Campbell, Cultural Atlas p. 197.

[2]Ibid.

[3]Magnusson, Vikings!, p. 17.

[4]H. R. Ellis Davidson, Viking Road to Byzantium (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1976), p. 96.

[5]Ibid., p. 96.

_______________________

This quote “And of course there were Buddhist missionaries in Athens Greece, as it was recorded by them that some Buddhist set himself afire to show the temporal nature of existence.� was not at all in my paper.

This quote “I wouldn't be surprised that some of these missionaries reached the Americas.� I do not think it is good scholarly work to infer that because there is a brass Buddha in a burial in Norway that therefore there is proof for Buddhism reaching the Americas. That is not say that Buddhism didn’t reach American shores, but you’d need some very substantial proof say examples of “Native Americans� who have similar belief systems, art and artifacts etc.
It would make for fascinating research.

Cheers,

Eelia
jathar98 is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 02:40 PM   #63
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Welcome!
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 02:48 PM   #64
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Actually, the more likely route of Buddhism getting to America - if it did - is via the Pacific coast - what is the earliest proven Chinese find now on the Pacific coast of N America?

And the so called native american ways of thinking I thought were more to do with earlier shamanistic and similar ideas, so buddhism can be understood as a later formalisation of existing ideas about how to treat one another.

HG Wells Outline of History is very interesting on this change from collective to heirarchical ways of being, that probably happened with the first towns and cities.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 03:02 PM   #65
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dharma
I'm afraid you are a linguist without much knowledge of myths and indo-european tradition. You should read the original Latin. I have a passion for myths. The originaly Latin states "Tuisto" NOT tuisco. No this matches the Indo-European god pantheon of Manu who is described as being descended from the
1)earth goddess ->2)twastra --> 3)marries daughter to the sun Vaivasavan--> 4)Manu is born 5)who has several sons.

The Germanic version gives 1)earth goddess->2)Tuisto->3)Manno-> 4) has several sons.
Sorry this post is late, I had not paid attention to this thread since it had spiraled into general vague proofs of buddhisms influence in general, away from it's original topic. I hadn't noticed you addressed points I made.

Obviously you didn't actually read the Latin, or you would have said the Latin used is Tuistonem. In fact there are different manuscripts of Tacitus, some have Tuistonem here, some have Tuisconem. Tacitus doesn't say Tuisco is born of a earth goddess, he says he is earth born. By the way, since Tacitus discusses the German Earth goddess, equivalent to the the Roman Terra Mater, as Nerthus, he would have made it clear by either of these titles that Tuisco was born from her.

I don't find the geneolgies very convincing. Saranyu is Tvastr's daughter sure, but Tvastr is architect to the gods and possibly hermaphroditic, I'm not sure he was born from the earth goddess, not that it matters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dharma
And another correction: Hebrew Adam supposedly comes from "Adamah" which means earth. Manu comes from the Sanskrit root which means "mind".Adam falls, Manu never falls. So the commonality between these myths end pretty much at "first man".
What the Hebrew Adam comes from, is a pretty complex question, which I think there have been a thread or two about, but since his name is used for mankind and vice versa it doesn't really matter. I don't think anyone doubts that German is an indo-european language, and that indo-european language based cultures have some commonalities in culture from whenever they split off, but these hardly constitute proof of buddhisms influence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dharma
Oh yes, I wish to point out that Ashok's edicts mention that even in lands that missionaries haven't reach, the message of the Dharma has reached:

http://hawthorngrove.faithweb.com/writings/horndgod.htm

And one more correction, the top knot for indo-Europeans has spiritual significance as the "yarmulk" (sp?) or hat has in semitic tradition. It is used primarily by sages. This is why Sikhs to this day also wear a top knot underneath the turban.
I'm not sure what the correction is about on the top-knot, my only statement was that a top knot is hardly a unique trait of buddhism or even India. Imagine people figuring out how to tie their hair, without the help of buddhist enlightenment(sarcasm).

Your arguments are much like: birds have wings, butterflys have wings, bats have wings, they all must be closely related.
yummyfur is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 03:22 PM   #66
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jathar98
I must agree that the finding of a brass Buddha in Norway does not connote Buddhism there, but does refer more to trade. The paper that you are referring to was about trade, not religion. The footnote you are looking for was available from the author, had you asked this being me. One of many of those footnotes is from The Vikings! by Magnus Magnusson, p. 17. It does not say anything about the religion being in Norway but discusses various trade routes and the Buddha being proof of extensive trade.

“the overland trade route that ran through Samarkand and Tashkent to China, and here a great market place had developed controlled by the Bulgar tribes.�[1] Smolensk, like Bulgar, formed a cultural crossroads, where East and West met to trade furs, slaves, silk, honey, ivory, spices, and a plethora of other goods and wares, all of which moved along the waterways.[2]

The waterways that pass through Russia provided a means of transportation and linkages into the political and social structures of the areas. The Swedish Vikings had to secure these waterways in order to control Near Eastern and Mediterranean trade. The waterways allowed many Vikings to reach distant lands as far as Baghdad, carrying trade goods and luxury items. Items found in graves in Scandinavia have included Indian coins from the sixth or seventh century,[3] a brass Buddha, silks, and glass, indicating the far-reaching territories with which trade was accomplished and thus the distances traveled. These items were collected on extended trading expeditions, and it is not unreasonable to infer that others of like kind may have been dispersed along the trade route.

William of Rubeck, a Franciscan missionary in the thirteenth century, mentioned Turkish merchants who trafficked in Russia bringing out ermine and grey-squirrel skins, while those going into Russia took cotton clothes, silks, and spices.[4] “Ships also came to the mouth of the Dnieper to buy dried fish,�[5] he wrote, thus showing, even at that late date, just how crucial the Russian passageways were to trade with the Orient and Byzantium. The Byzantine-Rus treaty of 911, which realized a special treaty of fishery use rights at the mouth of the Dnieper for the Rus, illustrates the kind of economic interactions that were occurring locally. Hence, the political and economic stability of Russia was of vast importance to the Vikings (particularly the Swedes), as well as the Byzantines. Accordingly, the Scandinavians established settlements in strategic locations and created trade, and subjugated or negotiated with the native populations to insure trade stability.

Footnotes:
[1]Campbell, Cultural Atlas p. 197.

[2]Ibid.

[3]Magnusson, Vikings!, p. 17.

[4]H. R. Ellis Davidson, Viking Road to Byzantium (London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1976), p. 96.

[5]Ibid., p. 96.

_______________________

This quote “And of course there were Buddhist missionaries in Athens Greece, as it was recorded by them that some Buddhist set himself afire to show the temporal nature of existence.� was not at all in my paper.

This quote “I wouldn't be surprised that some of these missionaries reached the Americas.� I do not think it is good scholarly work to infer that because there is a brass Buddha in a burial in Norway that therefore there is proof for Buddhism reaching the Americas. That is not say that Buddhism didn’t reach American shores, but you’d need some very substantial proof say examples of “Native Americans� who have similar belief systems, art and artifacts etc.
It would make for fascinating research.

Cheers,

Eelia

Thanks for the footnotes, the site originally linked to by Dharma, didn't have any footnotes,when I looked at it, it seems to be down now. Dharma cut and pasted from that site, and you will see his original post has no footnoting. My main interest was in what archeological site the Buddha came from. Thanks again.

here's the link Dharma orginally posted
http://eeliag.netwiz.net/CHAP3.html

It was Dharma who qouted your site and then added his own stuff at the end without making the seperation clear, that made it look like you said the stuff about buddhists in Athens and America. I did realize that, but I was addressing Dharma, and not your site, so I didn't really make that clear. I do realize that you weren't making Dharma's arguments, my only concern was wether we really had a brass Buddha at all, since nothing was cited in the original link Dharma gave. Also was interested in what the archeologists interpretation was.
yummyfur is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 04:12 PM   #67
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
Actually, the more likely route of Buddhism getting to America - if it did - is via the Pacific coast - what is the earliest proven Chinese find now on the Pacific coast of N America?

And the so called native american ways of thinking I thought were more to do with earlier shamanistic and similar ideas, so buddhism can be understood as a later formalisation of existing ideas about how to treat one another.

HG Wells Outline of History is very interesting on this change from collective to heirarchical ways of being, that probably happened with the first towns and cities.
The Chinese, who were generally either Confucian or Christians, were imported into nineteenth century California to work on the railways. The Japanese immigrants of 1870 are credited with the earliest Buddhism on the west coast.

The native Americans who came over the land bridge between Siberia and North America have some interesting genetic and cultural similarities with Asian cultures, but this happened well before Buddhist missionaries went from India to either the Roman Empire or Central Asia.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-15-2005, 04:18 PM   #68
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dharma
. . .

And of course there were Buddhist missionaries in Athens Greece, as it was recorded by them that some Buddhist set himself afire to show the temporal nature of existence.
I believe that this was an Indian who traveled back from India with Alexander's army. I don't think he was a Buddhist or a missionary.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 09:59 AM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
I believe that this was an Indian who traveled back from India with Alexander's army. I don't think he was a Buddhist or a missionary.
No it wasn't, it was long after Alexander the Great, from the same source previously posted from the ChristReview:
Quote:
Smile of the Buddha –
"Long before the word 'missionary' came to be synonymous with Christianity"
Buddhist monks ('dharma-bhanakas') were traipsing across Asia. Travelling the Silk and Spice Routes
they spread their doctrines all the way from Khotan in central Asia to Antioch and Alexandria in the west.
One such visit is documented in 20 BC in Athens. A Buddhist philosopher, part of an embassy from India,
made a doctrinal point by setting himself alight.
His tomb became a tourist attraction and is mentioned by several historians.
I also find it absolutely hilarious that Indians seemed to be far greater world travelers than the Greeks or anyone else in the ancient world:
Quote:
Eusebius in his biography of Socrates, relates an incident recorded in the fourth century B.C. in which Socrates met a Brahmin in the agora or the market place. The Brahmin asked Socrates what he was doing. Socrates replied that he was questioning people in order to understand man. At this, the Brahmin laughed and asked how one could understand man without knowing God.
Dharma is offline  
Old 05-16-2005, 10:10 AM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: U.S.
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
The Chinese, who were generally either Confucian or Christians, were imported into nineteenth century California to work on the railways. The Japanese immigrants of 1870 are credited with the earliest Buddhism on the west coast.

The native Americans who came over the land bridge between Siberia and North America have some interesting genetic and cultural similarities with Asian cultures, but this happened well before Buddhist missionaries went from India to either the Roman Empire or Central Asia.
You must be a bit more precise...am I understanding you correctly, the Chinese who were allowed in America were generally "self identified" as Christians (that would make sense since any other religion would be lambasted at the time) or "Confucian"? The Chinese for the most part recognize that their culture is a mixture of"Taoist/Confucian/Buddhist" mix...
Dharma is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.