Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-14-2013, 02:48 PM | #161 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Quote:
|
|
09-14-2013, 03:00 PM | #162 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
It seems at least some scholars have considered that some of the material from Oxyrhynchus were part of a public library:
Quote:
http://books.google.com/books?id=u9n...ary%22&f=false |
|
09-14-2013, 03:02 PM | #163 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
|
Quote:
|
||
09-14-2013, 03:16 PM | #164 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I don't know the original source but I cited three different modern sources who say the same thing. see above
|
09-14-2013, 03:19 PM | #165 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
On the library at Oxyrhynchus. Another source says http://books.google.com/books?id=SrT...ut.%22&f=false
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-14-2013, 03:20 PM | #166 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
Again here is the same story http://books.google.com/books?id=Fpg...esarea&f=false
Quote:
|
|
09-14-2013, 04:55 PM | #167 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
The fact that p oxy 405 was a roll is very significant too
|
09-14-2013, 05:26 PM | #168 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
I am also starting to think the rolls of the Gospel of Thomas were for reading in a library. The letters too small for reading out loud. The contents seem to be meant for personal use and reflection
|
09-14-2013, 09:07 PM | #169 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
|
List of documents dated to the fourth century related to Christianity:
http://www.areopage.net/PDF/PapyriFr...ityInEgypt.pdf I notice from this list that all manuscripts of Irenaeus in Egypt were on rolls - i.e. scrolls rather than codices. The other Irenaeus fragment: Quote:
|
|
09-14-2013, 11:36 PM | #170 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
You yourself have argued that the NT are LATER forgeries to prove PRIMACY. You yourself have argued that there is evidence parts of Against Heresies were composed in the 3rd century. Your own findings contradict Irenaeus. Writings attributed to Irenaeus are NOT credible--they are bogus and show evidence that the author was a fabricator. "Against Heresies" is pure unadulterated BS--monstrous myth fables--written by multiple unknown authors. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are ALL Fakes and the Gospels were NOT composed before c 70 CE. Irenaeus is a REJECT. Irenaeus' Against Heresies 3.1 Quote:
|
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|