aa5874

The Gospels and Epistles are actually documented evidence of the mythology that was believed by the Jesus cult.

If you wish to get a sample of the Mythological fables that were believed by the Jesus cult read Mark 6, Mark 9, Mark 16, Matthew 1, Luke 1, John 1, Acts 1, Acts 2, Galatians 1, 1 Corinthians 15 and Revelation.

The NT Canon speaks of a character that was the LOGOS, and God Creator, born of a Ghost, that was with Satan on the pinnacle of the Temple, that walked on water, transfigured, resurrected, and ascended in or on a cloud.

The Jesus cult writers attested that Jesus had no human father on earth and no human mother when he was the Logos in heaven.

It is documented--it was published all over the Roman Empire--Jesus was born after his mother was made pregnant by a Ghost.

The Gospels MATCH the Mythology of the Jews, Greeks and Roman.

The Gospels with the Entire Canon are pure unadulterated Myth Fables about Gods, Sons of God, Devils, Angels, Holy Ghosts and Demons.

Jesus was God and also a Ghost. It is documented.

Please, see the Nicene Creed. Please, see the Doctrine of the Trinity.

Grog

What evidence can you show me that there are no Klingons in orbit around Earth right now?

What evidence can you show me that ancient indigenous americans were not visited by aliens who helped them create massive pyramids, etc.

What evidence can you show me that Bigfoot does not exist?

MrMacSon

"too small to be seen by some" = special pleading for 'some'. Collections of anecdotes are not consensus.

a 'prepared mind' sounds like a mind with confirmation bias.

MrMacSon

The gospels are evidence of an embellished story, about a purported saviour: myth-fiction

J-D

Can you tell me the point of all these questions? At least for the first two I can point to evidence that satisfies me--the third may be trickier--but so what? There are many questions for which there isn't adequate evidence to draw a conclusion, but there are also many questions for which there is. I don't see the point of my going to the trouble of offering detailed answers to your questions without some idea of how that's relevant to the rest of the discussion.

Grog

I think you know. Your statement is flawed. To postulate the existence of something you need positive evidence of its existence. It doesn't have to be direct observation (such as the theory that there was a planet beyond Uranus), but there has to be some evidence from which we can infer existence. Higgs boson was inferred. Neptune was first inferred. Black holes are inferred. In all cases there was evidence to suggest existence. A moth with a 15-inch proboscis was inferred based on the existence of an orchid with a 16-inch flower. Since then just such a moth has been discovered and identified.

outhouse

The evidence is the gospels and epistles. It has never been proven to be all fiction, nor 100% mythology.

J-D

Then you're wrong. If I knew, I wouldn't have asked.Irrelevant, since I'm not postulating the existence of something.

Toto

Not this again. If you claim the gospels are evidence, you have to show that they are reliable evidence. You can't shift the burden of proof to anyone else to show hat they are not fictional.

Those are the rules of evidence. Otherwise, you might as well believe whatever you want.

outhouse

Wrong again.

It is up to scholars to determine the quality of the evidence and if it is credible or not.


It in no way means it is not evidence, only the validity of their findings is in question Toto.