FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > History of Abrahamic Religions & Related Texts
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 01:23 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2013, 09:11 AM   #91
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

And I apologize for any rudeness but hanging around here has made me very intolerant of argument by assertion
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 10:03 AM   #92
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Hi Stephan,

While Tuomas Rasimus may see "every reason to affirm, then, that Celsus had access to a copy of John's Gospel"...I see no reason to affirm that Celsus had access to John's Gospel or the Gospels of Matthew and Luke or Mark. Rather I see every reason to affirm the opposite that he had never heard of them.
There were no known Public libraries with the Jesus cult stories in the 2nd century . The Public libraries were filled with books from Epicurius, the Stoic, Herodotus, Plato, Zeno, and Diogenes, Cleanthes and other Greek and Roman writers.

Theophilus To Autolycus III
Quote:
Why, then, do Epicurus and the Stoics teach incest and sodomy, with which doctrines they have filled libraries, so that from boyhood this lawless intercourse is learned?...
Writings attributed to 2nd century writers like Justin, Aristides, Theophilus of Antioch, Irenaeus, Athenagoras mention NOTHING at all about Public libraries with the Jesus cult stories.

Up to the mid 2nd century ONLY the Septuagint was known to be in a Public Library.

And further, up to the late 2nd century Christians were accused of Incest and Cannibalism.

It is hardly likely that the teachings of a Jesus cult would be accepted in Public libraries of the Roman Empire.

Theophilus' To Autolycus 3.4
Quote:
Otherwise you would not have been moved by senseless men to yield yourself to empty words, and to give credit to the prevalent rumor wherewith godless lips falsely accuse us, who are worshippers of God, and are called Christians, alleging that the wives of us all are held in common and made promiscuous use of; and that we even commit incest with our own sisters, and, what is most impious and barbarous of all, that we eat human flesh. But further, they say that our doctrine has but recently come to light, and that we have nothing to allege in proof of what we receive as truth, nor of our teaching, but that our doctrine is foolishness.
Up to the late 2nd century Christians were considered ATHEISTS and CANNIBALS.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 11:08 AM   #93
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I don't see how your evidence proves anything. Another ridiculous post.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 02:15 PM   #94
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by watersbeak View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse
I'm sure that someone will disagree with more or less every statement in what I have just written. I have not written with footnotes to every sentence, however; instead I have presumed that the query is honest and tried to give a brief, honest reply.
Thank you very much Roger. This was an outstanding reply to an admittedly loosely constructed submission to the forum.
I appreciate the kind reply. You're welcome.

Quote:
I simply sought to learn what was so special about "christian" sources in ancient libraries. I remain confused about which author would identify himself as "christian". I have trouble imagining a librarian in Rome, (or Carthage, thanks Stephan Huller) looking at a text, in Greek, (Latin, not Greek, being the lingua franca of both cities), and trying to figure out, where to place the scroll, in the collection. "What is a 'christian'?", such a person may wish to inquire from the person depositing the text. More to the point, how did the author understand that he/she should identify himself/herself to the library, as a "christian" author? Would someone else, come along, and say to the same person, "I am a follower of Marcion"?, or, "I am a follower of Zoroaster"?
If we imagine an ancient library containing boxes labelled with works from philosophical schools; "from the followers of Zeno", "from the followers of Pythagoras", etc; it is certainly possible to imagine a box containing rolls "from the Christians", "from the Jews", etc. Remember the group was illegal; so the Romans certainly knew who they were. If they didn't, they could ask: only a Christian was at all likely to say, "Christianus sum" (I am a Christian), since, as Tertullian tells us, the pagans jeered "Non licet esse vos" (You are not allowed to exist), and the trial records of both the Scilltan martyrs and of the trial of Justin and his friends (? from memory) treat that very statement, with no addition, by the accused as a confession of a capital crime. Indeed there were legal manuals specifying the punishments to be handed out to Christians.

A librarian should certainly know Greek, in both cities, at least until late antiquity.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 02:30 PM   #95
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
Remember the group was illegal; so the Romans certainly knew who they were.
Yes some groups were prosecuted. But notice the groups persecuted during the time of Commodus. Apollodorus (earliest manuscripts have a strange remembrance of his name as 'Apollos' = Apelles; see Origen's testimony about the interchangeability of the two names in manuscripts - even to this day). He was from Alexandria and the Scilltan martyrs what do they utter to the question 'what books do you have?' Books of Paul = Marcionite or some such group. Even Tertullian was part of a heretical group by the end of the second century.

Notice also Irenaeus's testimony about the number of 'men of faith' in the Imperial court, their receiving ample means from the Emperor and Eusebius's statement again

Quote:
About the same time, in the reign of Commodus, our condition became more favorable, and through the grace of God the churches throughout the entire world enjoyed peace, and the word of salvation was leading every soul, from every race of man to the devout worship of the God of the universe. So that now at Rome many who were highly distinguished for wealth and family turned with all their household and relatives unto their salvation.
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 02:35 PM   #96
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
If we imagine an ancient library containing boxes labelled with works from philosophical schools; "from the followers of Zeno", "from the followers of Pythagoras", etc; it is certainly possible to imagine a box containing rolls "from the Christians", "from the Jews", etc. Remember the group was illegal; so the Romans certainly knew who they were. If they didn't, they could ask: only a Christian was at all likely to say, "Christianus sum" (I am a Christian), since, as Tertullian tells us, the pagans jeered "Non licet esse vos" (You are not allowed to exist)
I wonder whether this is the origin of the Latin term - even in Greek - to define the Christians (i.e. Christianus). In other words, the classification of the library system defined them. The box was undoubtedly labelled 'Christiani'
stephan huller is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 02:48 PM   #97
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
And I apologize for any rudeness but hanging around here has made me very intolerant of argument by assertion
The secret is the "Ignore list". If you don't use it, you'll go insane.
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 03:41 PM   #98
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Pearse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
And I apologize for any rudeness but hanging around here has made me very intolerant of argument by assertion
The secret is the "Ignore list". If you don't use it, you'll go insane.

Worked for me a long time ago.


Only bad thing is most of these guys traverse to other forums, and it takes a few days before you figure out who is who.
outhouse is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 04:53 PM   #99
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Excuse me, but isn't this a bit of a pot calling the kettle black??

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephan huller View Post
And I apologize for any rudeness but hanging around here has made me very intolerant of argument by assertion
Duvduv is offline  
Old 09-12-2013, 05:05 PM   #100
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.