FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > History of Abrahamic Religions & Related Texts
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 01:23 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-03-2013, 10:54 PM   #621
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
Early Pauline writings is merely a long-held presumption installed by Chineses Christian Whisperers.
Yet it would then be easy to disprove a early date. And it has not been disproven.


Why do the vast majority of unbiased scholars not fight the current dates?


Will you make more unfounded excuses :huh:
outhouse is offline  
Old 07-03-2013, 10:58 PM   #622
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMacSon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Early Pauline writings is merely a long-held presumption installed by Chineses Whispers.
Early Pauline writings is merely a long-held presumption installed by Chineses Christian Whisperers.
Please, not only Christians promote Chinese Whispers but even so-called Scholars presume without a shred of evidence from antiquity that Pauline Epistles were composed before c 70 CE.

In Acts of the Apostles, although there is no mention of the Pauline Corpus, the author gives the impression that the Pauline writer was still alive up to 59 -62 CE, and Apologetic writers claimed Paul was still Alive After gLuke was compose d. See Church History 6.25.

Based on Apologetic sources, and the very Canon, the Pauline Corpus was unknown from at least c 62 -180 C E.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 12:00 AM   #623
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Only in the Scripture of the Jesus cult it is found that Jesus DIED for OUR Sins, was buried and was raised on the THIRD Day.

No such thing is in the Septuagint or Hebrew Scripture
Umm the Paschal lamb story in the flight from Egypt

Jonah in the Whale.
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 04:17 AM   #624
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

Except the metaphor is wrong. The atonement sacrifice was the sacrifice of Yom Kippur, not the paschal sacrifice. Yet for some strange reason this was ignored.
Duvduv is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:02 AM   #625
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

What was ignored by whom?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 06:37 AM   #626
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
Quote:
Only in the Scripture of the Jesus cult it is found that Jesus DIED for OUR Sins, was buried and was raised on the THIRD Day.

No such thing is in the Septuagint or Hebrew Scripture
Umm the Paschal lamb story in the flight from Egypt

Jonah in the Whale.
Please, be specific. You have not even shown where it is stated that JESUS died for OUR SINS, was BURIED and ROSE on the THIRD Day in the Septuagint or the OT.

You very well know that Jonah the prophet in the OT did NOT die when he was swallowed by the whale in the Myth Fables called Jonah, so could NOT have died for the Sins of mankind and was NOT resurrected.

You very well know that the Ritual of the Paschal Lamb had NOTHING whatsoever to do with UNIVERSAL Salvation--Nothing to do with Remission of Sins-- but was specifically a Ritual of Jews based on the Myth Fables of their EXODUS from Egypt.

And most glaring, you very well know the Paschal Lamb does NOT resurrect on the THIRD day.

Please, I have gone through this many, many times and there is NO passage in the OT or the Septuagint which states that Jesus died for our Sins, was buried and rose on the THIRD day. NONE--ZERO--NIL.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 07:28 AM   #627
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

The gospel and apologists who used the metaphor of thepascal lamb ignored the incorrect metaphor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle View Post
What was ignored by whom?
Duvduv is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 08:09 AM   #628
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

By the way, the claim in the Pauline Corpus that Jesus died for the Sins of mankind is Blasphemy to the Jews.

No such blasphemy is found in Hebrew Scripture.

Preparation of the Gospel 1
Quote:
But sons of the Hebrews also would find fault with us, that being strangers and aliens we misuse their books, which do not belong to us at all, and because in an impudent and shameless way, as they would say, we thrust ourselves in, and try violently to thrust out the true family and kindred from their own ancestral rights. .............................Moreover they say that we very absurdly welcome with the greatest eagerness the charges against their nation for the sins they committed, but on the other hand pass over in silence the promises of good things foretold to them; or rather, that we violently pervert and transfer them to ourselves, and so plainly defraud them while we are simply deceiving ourselves.

But the most unreasonable thing of all is, that though we do not observe the customs of their Law as they do, but openly break the Law, we assume to ourselves the better rewards which have been promised to those who keep the Law.
There is NO LAW in Hebrew Scripture that Jesus died for Remission of Sins, and NOTHING about a character Jesus who was buried and was raised on the THIRD day.

Only in the Jesus cult Scriptures it is claimed that God Sacrificied his ONLY Begotten Son for the Salvation of all mankind and that he was buried and raised on the THIRD day.

The Jews did NOT even admit that Jesus the Christ had already come up to at least the 4th century.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 08:13 AM   #629
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Babble Belt
Posts: 20,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
yes, the English-language translations all continued the error.
You knew in advance of posting that English translations used the word "James" yet try to give the impression it was only the KJV.
Nope. Just pointing out that the KJV is a crappy translation, filled with errors and bias.

Quote:
WHY??
Because you insist on using the worst possible English-language translation of the Bible, for some unknown reason.
Davka is offline  
Old 07-04-2013, 09:37 AM   #630
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
yes, the English-language translations all continued the error.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874
You knew in advance of posting that English translations used the word "James" yet try to give the impression it was only the KJV.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davka View Post
Nope. Just pointing out that the KJV is a crappy translation, filled with errors and bias.
Well, now you know that the NASB and other English translations use the name [I]James[/b] like the KJV.

You have only confirmed that you did not know what you were talking about.

Please, do some actual research before you make fallacious claims about the KJV.
aa5874 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.