FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-14-2003, 11:55 AM   #131
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,945
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
I guess it's just a difference in interpretation. I think the scriptures indicating that Christ's sacrifice was foreordained are pretty strong evidence that god established an obligation that the sacrifice was necessary, and thus god (after such an establishment) could not simply "revoke the law" and forgive without the sacrifice.
This is "sort of" correct. The law did not "establish" an obligation. The law "declared" that a sacrifice was required to atone for sin. The animal sacrifices were typical, i.e., symbolic, of the true sacrifice which was Jesus (who is God).

Whenever there is an offense, someone must bear the consequence, either the offended party or the offending party. We recognize this in ordinary affairs. If someone steals from me, there are two possible resolutions:
1. The theif restores what he has taken, plus a punitive amount.
2. I "forgive" the offense, which requires that I "bear" the cost myself.

The consequence for sin (an offense against the Creator to whom one owes absolute obedience) is death. Adam's sin corrupted his nature and so, the sentence of death passed to all his descendants, i.e., the entire human race.

All men are under the sentence of death (this is why there are no "innocents,") and God may justly execute that sentence at any point. His purpose in creating man, however, was to show his grace by redeeming a people from this sentence.

In order to do this, he had to endure the penalty himself (#2 above). This is why Jesus must be God - God could not justly assign the penalty to a third party and no other created being could meet the requirement for justice.

Re "the blood;" the bible declares, long before modern medicine was around, that "life is in the blood." This was established in God's command to Noah, "whoever 'sheds man's blood,'' i.e., killed someone, would forfeit his own life.
theophilus is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:02 PM   #132
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,945
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan
That is an unjustified conclusion that has no basis.

That is, unless the bible is true.

I do not believe in "sin".

And just what position would one expect a "sinner" to take?

Death is not a result of "sin".

You have no idea what the cause of death is.

Do plants sin?

No, plants do not sin, but the entire creation came under corruption because of Adam's sin.

The concept of "sin" is all in your head.
Well, sin is certainly "in" your head (and your heart and your will and your emotions).
theophilus is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:05 PM   #133
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by theophilus
The consequence for sin (an offense against the Creator to whom one owes absolute obedience) is death. Adam's sin corrupted his nature and so, the sentence of death passed to all his descendants, i.e., the entire human race.
That's funny.

DT 24:16, 2KI 14:6, 2CH 25:4, EZ 18:20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.

Hmm? Can someone say "inconsistency"?
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:06 PM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the land of two boys and no sleep.
Posts: 9,890
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by theophilus
Well, sin is certainly "in" your head (and your heart and your will and your emotions).
You're avoiding the question.
Wyz_sub10 is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:07 PM   #135
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Where is the JUSTICE for punishing me for Adam's sin?
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:08 PM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by theophilus
Well, sin is certainly "in" your head (and your heart and your will and your emotions).
Like hell it is.
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:13 PM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,247
Default

Theo,

It is completely idiotic to even think about the "cause of death". I don't want to live forever. Maybe you do. I'm really happy for you.

I am EXTREMELY grateful to know that some day my life will end.
Hawkingfan is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:16 PM   #138
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 889
Default

Hawkingfan,
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan
That makes no sense. I'll say it again. IT MAKES NO SENSE TO "FORGET SIN" BY COMMITING FURTHER REPREHENSIBLE ACTS!!
Just a heads up...the post said 'not forget sin'. Because sacrifice was emotionally heavy and difficult, time-consuming and costly...man would not forget why he was there. Better yet...man would be less inclined to sin in the future knowing what he would have to go through to atone for it.


Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan

BY DOING SOMETHING MUCH WORSE????
What is 'much worse'?



Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan

How about trying to do something good instead?!
Sure. You mean like repenting? This is exactly what sacrifice encouraged.



Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas
Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:21 PM   #139
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 889
Default

Hawkingfan,
Quote:
Originally posted by Hawkingfan
That's funny.

DT 24:16, 2KI 14:6, 2CH 25:4, EZ 18:20 Children are not to suffer for their parent's sins.

Hmm? Can someone say "inconsistency"?
Show me a sinless person...and I'll show you an 'inconsistency'.




Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas
Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas is offline  
Old 03-14-2003, 12:22 PM   #140
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

This is "sort of" correct. The law did not "establish" an obligation. The law "declared" that a sacrifice was required to atone for sin. The animal sacrifices were typical, i.e., symbolic, of the true sacrifice which was Jesus (who is God).

Call it what you want, according to the bible (the way I see it), the "system" was set up, established, or declared by god in that way (and long before the Law), and thus being declared, god himself was bound to it (I'm assuming god can't violate something once he's declared it).

Further, the bible indicates that the sacrifice was "declared" long before the Law was established, unless the Law was established "from before the foundation of the world."


(Disclaimer to observers: herein I've stated my understanding of scriptures. My comments do not reflect my actual beliefs, nor the beliefs of this forum, the II, or the SecWeb. Further, I consider the account I've related as, in its essence, "fictional", and is not intended to be a representation of reality, thank reason.)
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.