Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-01-2002, 02:06 PM | #11 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 77
|
Quote:
<a href="http://www.theonion.com/onion3534/missing_the_point.html" target="_blank">http://www.theonion.com/onion3534/missing_the_point.html</A> |
|
05-01-2002, 04:07 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baulkham Hills, New South Wales,Australia
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2002, 04:36 PM | #13 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
05-01-2002, 05:43 PM | #14 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
|
Quote:
The universe began with a huge explosion. I would not have answered "True" to this one, only "Probably true, given that it is more widely supported by the evidence than other theories of the origin of the universe and has not yet been falsified despite being intrinsically falsifiable". Between "true" and "false", my honest answer would be "I don't know, next question please". |
|
05-01-2002, 06:22 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,049
|
Was the universe created by an explosion? Well, no actually. The "Big Bang" was a rapid expansion of space itself, not a rapid expansion of hot gas within space - which is what an explosion is.
|
05-01-2002, 08:33 PM | #16 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
|
L_C - that, too.
|
05-01-2002, 10:14 PM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
That's splitting hairs. The Big Bang is still an explosion, even if there is nothing that it's exploding into.
|
05-02-2002, 05:27 AM | #18 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Madison
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
|
|
05-02-2002, 03:01 PM | #19 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baulkham Hills, New South Wales,Australia
Posts: 944
|
Quote:
|
|
05-03-2002, 08:53 AM | #20 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
|
Oh questions like that are just whacky. I took the ACI exam for Concrete testing. One of the specs is that for a slump test, your cone must be relatively smooth. The question then read, is it alright for your cone to have minor irregularities. The answer was NO!
I was hesitant on the big bang, because I see that as really an expansion, not an explosion. And lasers use light, so I just made the jump there. But how the hell can you think lasers use sound? How much friction in between particles would a sound wave have to make to have a light be present? I'd venture it isn't really possible. And isn't light a word in the anagram of LASER anyways? 80% of people in the US are against cell cloning. 98% of people in the US don't have a clue of what cell cloning is. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|