FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2003, 11:09 AM   #191
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Default

yguy - thanks, but I deserved it. A post from scigirl isn't worth responding to unless it has a pubmed or a webmd excerpt in it.

One more point to fatherphil. I just noticed that you made this comment earlier:
Quote:
i question the morality of the need to use a substance just to get through a weekend.
The word that stuck out here is need. Are you saying that those people didn't really need the drug in the first place? Or are you saying that despite their actual need of the drug, the drug was still immoral?

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 01:03 PM   #192
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Default

Hey Gurdur,

I've read similar reports of the Netherlands statistics. I was wondering - do you have any links handy?

Also, do you know if the Netherlands saw a decrease in the hard core drugs after they legalized pot? My guess is that they have always had less of a problem than the United States, but if pot legalization is temporally linked to a further decrease in hard core drug usage, that would be very damaging to the movement to keep marijuana a criminal offense**.

Thanks,

scigirl

** Of course I'm making an assumption here that policymakers even consider actual scientific data to start with, and that's a very unlikely assumption I'm afraid.
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 01:43 PM   #193
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by scigirl
....
do you have any links handy?
Problem is, 'm lazy, so I tend to operate off memory all the time.
However, as you know, I'ld cut off and gnaw my right hand for you, so I'm busily looking for links and hard info.
It will take me a day or so to really find things, so I'll be back later with proper results.

In the meantime:

Country Profiles of qualitative (drug-abuse) research in each EU member country

or this: Comparison of the number of hard drug addicts under the Dutch Drugs Policy compared with other European Countries

or this: Comparative drug usage between countries

or this: Country comparison: The Netherlands

or this:
Quote:
Illegal drug use in the U.S. and the Netherlands (1997)

EVER USED ||| USED PAST YEAR ||| USED PAST MONTH
USA | DUTCH ||| USA | DUTCH ||| USA | DUTCH

MARIJUANA 32.9 | 15.6 ||| 9.0 | 4.5 ||| 5.1 | 2.5
COCAINE 10.5 2.1 1.9 0.6 0.7 0.2
INHALANTS 5.7 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.4 Too small to measure
HEROIN 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.1 Too small to measure Too small to measure

Source U.S.: National Household Survey 1997 SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, Washington, DC.
Source the Netherlands: M. Abraham, P. Cohen, M. DeWinter; Licit and Illicit drug use in the Netherlands,
Center for Drug Research, University of Amsterdam.

then:
Quote:
{from the official Dutch government info site on their drugs policy}

5 Is it true that soft drugs are a stepping stone to hard drugs?
No. In the Netherlands very few people turn from soft drugs to hard drugs. Relatively few are addicted to opiates (such as heroin, morphine or methadone). Their number has not increased in recent years, and it is far below that of cannabis users. There is absolutely no evidence that the policy on soft drugs leads to the use of hard drugs.

Regular surveys are held among people aged 12 years and older to monitor trends in drug use. According to the most recent survey, 15.6% have used cannabis at some point in their lives, compared with 32.9% in the United States. The figures for cocaine are 2.1% in the Netherlands and 10.5% in the United States, and for heroin 0.3% in the Netherlands compared with 0.9% in the United States. Of course, the number of people who report having taken drugs at least once in their lives is far higher than those who take them at present. 2.5% of the Dutch population used cannabis in the month preceding the survey (see Annex 3).



6 What are the current trends regarding ecstasy and amphetamines?
The use of ecstasy and amphetamines among secondary-school pupils declined between 1996 and 1999. The use of ecstasy among 15-16 year-olds is highest in Ireland. The use of amphetamines by the same age group is highest in the United Kingdom, although here too the use of ecstasy and amphetamines among youngsters has declined (1995-1999).

The figures for ecstasy and amphetamines in the Netherlands are average for the European Union. The number of people in the member states who report having used ecstasy at least once ranges from 0% to 4%. The figures for amphetamines range from 0.5% to 4%, except for a record 10% in the United Kingdom. With a score of 2% for both drugs, the Netherlands is roughly average.
or this:
Quote:
{old Dutch consular info}

DRUG USE STATISTICS: A COMPARISON

Recent accounts in the U.S. press about the Netherlands drug policy have included incorrect and misleading statistics about drug use and drug-related crimes in the Netherlands. What follows is a short list of facts and comparisons to refute those accounts. Sources are given to permit and encourage third party verification of facts.

Last month use of cannabis (marijuana) by high school seniors:
18.1% in the Netherlands (1996);
23.7% in the U.S. (1997).
(Sources: The Trimbos Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Monitoring the
Future Survey, University of Michigan and White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy)

Any lifetime use (prevalence) of cannabis by older teens (1994):
30% in the Netherlands;
38% in the U.S.
(Sources: Center for Drug Research, University of Amsterdam; Monitoring the
Future Survey, University of Michigan and White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy)

Recent (last month) use of cannabis by 15 year olds (in 1995):
15% in the Netherlands;
16% in the U.S.;
24% in the U.K.
(Sources: Trimbos Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Monitoring the
Future Survey, University of Michigan and White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy; Council of Europe, ESPAD Report)

Any lifetime use of cannabis by 15 year olds (in 1995):
29% in the Netherlands;
34% in the U.S.;
41% in the U.K.
(Sources: Netherlands Institute of Health and Addiction, U.S. National
Institute for Drug Abuse; Council of Europe, ESPAD Report)

Heroin addicts as a percentage of population (in 1995):
160 per 100,000 in the Netherlands;
430 per 100,000 in the U.S.
(Sources: Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; White House
Office of National Drug Control Policy)

Murder rate as a percentage of population (in 1996):
1.8 per 100,000 in the Netherlands;
8.22 in the U.S.
(Sources: Netherlands Bureau of Statistics; White House Office of National
Drug Control Policy)

Incarceration rate as a percentage of population (1997):
73 per 100,000 in the Netherlands;
645 per 100,000 in the U.S.
(Sources: Netherlands Ministry of Justice; White House Office of National
Drug Control Strategy)

Crime-related deaths as a percentage of population:
1.2 per 100,000 in the Netherlands (1994);
8.2 per 100,000 in the U.S. (1995).
(Sources: World Health Organization; Uniform Crime Reports, U.S. Federal
Bureau of Investigation)

Per capita spending on drug-related law enforcement:
$27 per capita in the Netherlands;
$81 per capita in the U.S.
(Sources: Netherlands Ministry of Justice; White House Office of National
Drug Control Strategy)
Gurdur is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 01:59 PM   #194
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Unfortunately, the Netherlands is rotting away from within, and is being openly infiltrated by Islamic terrorists as we speak; because the same lack of moral resolve which prompted the Dutch to acquiesce to those who promoted licentiousness as a virtue compels them to acquiesce to the intimidation of the Arab European League.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 02:08 PM   #195
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy

Unfortunately, the Netherlands is rotting away from within,
I guess you didn't bother reading the stats I cited just above.
The Netherlands is a hell of a lot less rotted than the USA.

Quote:
and is being openly infiltrated by Islamic terrorists as we speak;
I suggest the FBI should investigate your curiously omniscient knowledge on this.

Quote:
because the same lack of moral resolve which prompted the Dutch to acquiesce to those who promoted licentiousness as a virtue
Read the stats, and the official Dutch government policy (links given above)
Quote:
compels them to acquiesce to the intimidation of the Arab European League.
Do you have any proof of this ?
Or is this some wild flight of rhetoric ?

yguy, I'm disappointed in you. Normally you can manage at least some stats or evidence. Sad how the mighty tumble.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 02:45 PM   #196
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by gurdur

Unfortunately, the Netherlands is rotting away from within,


I guess you didn't bother reading the stats I cited just above.
The Netherlands is a hell of a lot less rotted than the USA.
The statistics only address drug use. Amsterdam harbors an advocacy journal for pedophilia called Paidika, while mainstream homosexuals in America have utterly repudiated NAMBLA to the point that it is now essentially impotent as a propaganda tool for pedophilia pushers. So while America is indeed rotting from within, Holland is obviously a few years ahead of us.

Quote:
and is being openly infiltrated by Islamic terrorists as we speak;

I suggest the FBI should investigate your curiously omniscient knowledge on this.
We have enough problems along those lines here.

Quote:
because the same lack of moral resolve which prompted the Dutch to acquiesce to those who promoted licentiousness as a virtue compels them to acquiesce to the intimidation of the Arab European League.

Do you have any proof of this ?
http://www.arabeuropean.org/News/ael-holland1.html

During the week of lectures held by Dyab Abou Jahjah the interest within the community was very high and the enthusiasm was total. Also membership is booming, we started the week with 250 registered members and ended it with 550 members and new members are still flowing by dozens. Abou Jahjah told our correspondent tonight that he believes the Dutch branches will be one of the strongest branches of the AEL. He added that even though our community in Holland has a better socio-economical situation than in Belgium , the anti-Muslim attitudes in the Netherlands are more aggressive and outspoken."



http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4489526,00.html

Mr Abou Jahjah, who has organised "lively" pro-Palestinian demonstrations in Antwerp and who doesn't hide his sympathies with groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, would seem, however, to mark a change in tactics.

It is perhaps safe to assume that the reality behind the facts presented here is more ominous than their superficial content.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 02:53 PM   #197
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Default

yguy - you say amsterdam harbors this group? Well america harbors plenty of nutjobs, but that doesn't mean that america itself, and its policies, are immoral. Furthermore, it does not have anything, repeat [/i]anything[/i] to do with the FACT that the netherlands big "experiment" on drug legalization outright disproves the claim that legalizing marijuana will lead to use of more hardcore drugs.

Wahh, how come nobody sticks to the science stuff we post? I'm changing my name to insultgirl cuz that's all anyone addresses anyways.

pouts

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 03:16 PM   #198
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by scigirl
yguy - you say amsterdam harbors this group? Well america harbors plenty of nutjobs, but that doesn't mean that america itself, and its policies, are immoral.
It seems to me that advocacy of pedophilia is at least an order of magnitude worse than even white supremacy or any other fringe ideology you could name which has enough of a following to draw media attention.

Quote:
Furthermore, it does not have anything, repeat [/i]anything[/i] to do with the FACT that the netherlands big "experiment" on drug legalization outright disproves the claim that legalizing marijuana will lead to use of more hardcore drugs.
I have never argued the point that way, and in fact rolling back such legalization of MJ as has happened in CA and OR is not my biggest concern. Drug use doesn't cause immorality - it facilitates it. I think we need to look at why people take drugs that they don't need, because a nation can't be any better than the character of the people who constitute it.

Quote:
Wahh, how come nobody sticks to the science stuff we post? I'm changing my name to insultgirl cuz that's all anyone addresses anyways.

pouts

scigirl


If fatherphil doesn't answer you in the next day or two, I'll take a crack at your posts...but as you probably know by now, I'm not that impressed by empirical data as a rule, and we may not be able to connect that well - so I'll give him the first shot at you.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 03:42 PM   #199
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
I'm not that impressed by empirical data as a rule, and we may not be able to connect that well - so I'll give him the first shot at you.
Well I'll keep that in mind - how about completely fabricated data? I can read websites such as this one to get ideas on how to either compeletly twist empirical data, or just fabricate it out of thin air.



You don't have to wait for fatherphil if you don't want to - you can both tear into my post.

scigirl
scigirl is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 03:51 PM   #200
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by scigirl
......
Wahh, how come nobody sticks to the science stuff we post? I'm changing my name to insultgirl cuz that's all anyone addresses anyways.
If you prefer, Scigirl, I'll stick to providing dry crime and drugs stats, or even duck out completely, rather than run the risk of inadvertantly aiding derailment of the thread and your argument.
It's your call; serious offer.
Gurdur is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.