Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Doubting Didymus · 02-18-2003, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pz

While you're at it, though, you can also tell those molecular biologists to stop using the term "sequence homology" when they really mean "sequence similarity".

Done!

Oi! You molecular biologists! Stop it!

RufusAtticus · 02-18-2003, 07:15 PM

When Hovind gets to 100 we need to send him an email telling him that he has been voted the most ridiculous creationist.

Doubting Didymus · 02-18-2003, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RufusAtticus
When Hovind gets to 100 we need to send him an email telling him that he has been voted the most ridiculous creationist.

Do you think he'd really stand a chance against Ken Ham if he were there?

notMichaelJackson · 02-18-2003, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RufusAtticus
When Hovind gets to 100 we need to send him an email telling him that he has been voted the most ridiculous creationist.

Rufus, I have been thinking that for a while. But will he read it? Or respond?

notMichaelJackson · 02-18-2003, 10:21 PM

I think it would be very interesting if Kent Hovind, or any other famous Creationist, joined this board. He most likely will not, since he is too busy agreeing will all who agree with him who agree with him about this and that...

Oh, and if you want to make sure that at least one-hundred people vote for Hovind, I suggest that a mod turn this thread into an annoucement, at least temporirily. (Please excuse my spelling). At the moment we are still 23 votes away from that goal.

notMichaelJackson · 02-18-2003, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doubting Didymus
Do you think he'd really stand a chance against Ken Ham if he were there?

Sorry, I had never heard of Ham when I created this poll. He wasn't on talk origins list.

Doubting Didymus · 02-18-2003, 10:25 PM

Creationists are generally known to avoid online debates, where you actually have to back up what you're saying. They prefer live debates, where you can pepper the opponent with a hundred meaningless questions at once, and win by default.

Doubting Didymus · 02-18-2003, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notMichaelJackson
Sorry, I had never heard of Ham when I created this poll. He wasn't on talk origins list.

What list is this? Linky linky please.

notMichaelJackson · 02-18-2003, 10:27 PM

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/credentials.html

Doubting Didymus · 02-18-2003, 10:34 PM

Ahhh it the questionable credentials list! Naturally, this list does not include people with no credentials of any kind at all, or people who have real credentials, in completely unrelated fields.

View Poll Results: Who is the most Ridiculous Creationist?
"Dr. Dino" Kent Hovind	121	90.98%
Thomas Barnes	0	0%
Carl Baugh	6	4.51%
Richard Bliss	0	0%
Thomas Barnes	0	0%
John Grebe	0	0%
Don Patton	0	0%
Kelly Segraves	0	0%
Harold Slusher	1	0.75%
Other	5	3.76%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

02-18-2003, 07:15 PM	#32
RufusAtticus Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: NCSU Posts: 5,853	When Hovind gets to 100 we need to send him an email telling him that he has been voted the most ridiculous creationist.

02-18-2003, 10:21 PM	#35
notMichaelJackson Banned Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: IL Posts: 552	I think it would be very interesting if Kent Hovind, or any other famous Creationist, joined this board. He most likely will not, since he is too busy agreeing will all who agree with him who agree with him about this and that... Oh, and if you want to make sure that at least one-hundred people vote for Hovind, I suggest that a mod turn this thread into an annoucement, at least temporirily. (Please excuse my spelling). At the moment we are still 23 votes away from that goal.

02-18-2003, 10:25 PM	#37
Doubting Didymus Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: East Coast. Australia. Posts: 5,455	Creationists are generally known to avoid online debates, where you actually have to back up what you're saying. They prefer live debates, where you can pepper the opponent with a hundred meaningless questions at once, and win by default.

02-18-2003, 10:27 PM	#39
notMichaelJackson Banned Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: IL Posts: 552	http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/credentials.html

02-18-2003, 10:34 PM	#40
Doubting Didymus Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: East Coast. Australia. Posts: 5,455	Ahhh it the questionable credentials list! Naturally, this list does not include people with no credentials of any kind at all, or people who have real credentials, in completely unrelated fields.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.