Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-03-2003, 11:50 PM | #61 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
Hatred or fondness of Christianity is off topic. Please take it to General Religious Discussions.
best, Peter Kirby |
05-03-2003, 11:58 PM | #62 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Why is "inspiration" on topic to being with? Inspiration (arguments pro and con) is a theological subject. It is not "biblical criticism".
Anyways, G, if you answer the question in another forum let me know. If not, no big deal. Vinnie |
05-04-2003, 12:24 AM | #63 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
My working definition of "on topic" is whatever relates to our understanding of the Bible or Jewish/Christian religion in antiquity. Since we have many debates over whether the Bible is the Word of God, it seems on-topic to discuss what that would mean, i.e. a theory of inspiration, which is a theory of what happened when the biblical writers put pen to papyrus so long ago. I welcome further clarification of what is "on topic" from my fellow moderators, as I don't think we have hammered out a constitution of what is on topic.
best, Peter Kirby |
05-04-2003, 04:26 AM | #64 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,532
|
From Tercel:
Quote:
RED DAVE |
|
05-04-2003, 07:47 AM | #65 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N.S.W.
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
|
|
05-04-2003, 08:09 AM | #66 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
Quote:
Inspiration has nothing to do with historical reconstruction or biblical criticism. The historian must assume the text was written like all other texts from the outset. Without those "naturalist assumptions" all history is lost. Biblical criticism falls outside of the purview of prophetic amanuenses, inspiring deities or redacting archangels. Inspiration is a theological concept, not a [i]historical/i] one. If we find ancient Roman documents we do not entertain the notion that apes, aliens or angels wrote them. We assume that ancient Romans did. Vinnie |
||
05-04-2003, 08:48 AM | #67 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
As I said, I haven't conferred with the other moderators in forming my concept of what is on topic. It is true that we have frequently permitted discussion of the stories of the Bible in a way that includes theological or atheological considerations; some discussions have concerned Christian theology or apologetics in ways that are not even tied to the Bible. I would welcome the second opinion of another moderator on whether hatred of Christianity is on topic.
best, Peter Kirby |
05-04-2003, 09:22 AM | #68 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
Quote:
Vinnie |
|
05-04-2003, 09:30 AM | #69 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
|
I move that we rename the forum "Biblical Criticism & Hatred of Christianity."
best, Peter Kirby |
05-04-2003, 09:41 AM | #70 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Waterbury, Ct, Usa
Posts: 6,523
|
LOL
Vinnie |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|