FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-06-2002, 02:54 PM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ilgwamh:
<strong>"""""This of course assumes that the Gospel rendering of Jesus' death in Pilate's time is accurate....."""""

Why shouldn't we?</strong>

Why should we? The gospels are all legendary material. All parts are equally suspect until proven by solid outside sources.

Further, the gospel figure is a composite. Which one was the one that was executed?

Additionally, there are at least 3 versions of Jesus death that I know of -- one that Pilate killed him, one that Herod killed him during Pilate's time (GosPeter and Luke), and Eusebius records a tradition that he was executed much earlier, in 21. Paul knows nothing of Jesus death, even though he's been there, and was persecuting Christians at the time. In light of all this, why should I pick any one tradition over the other?

Vorkosigan

[ July 06, 2002: Message edited by: Vorkosigan ]</p>
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 07-07-2002, 05:42 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: the dark side of Mars
Posts: 1,309
Post

When someone tells me Paul, or someone else who wrote bible chapters were inspired by God, I reply, How do we know?
I can sit right here right now and say God is inspiring me to type that it's bunk. That doesn't prove there's any inspiration behind my opinions at all, and I don't think Paul or any of the rest of them are any different.
Radcliffe Emerson is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:09 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.