FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-09-2003, 09:48 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N.S.W.
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TwEek
Let's go to our friend Merriam-Webster:
"Main Entry: 3rape
Function: noun
Date: 14th century
1 : an act or instance of robbing or despoiling or carrying away a person by force
2 a : sexual intercourse with a woman by a man without her consent and chiefly by force or deception -- compare STATUTORY RAPE b : unlawful sexual intercourse by force or threat other than by a man with a woman
3 : an outrageous violation"

I'd say that child sexual abuse is an outrageous violation.
I agree.

When discussing a subject such as this it is important to remember that we are not dealing strictly with matters of morals. What we are dealing with is ASSAULT, an attack causing harm, not metaphorical harm, to another human being.
The vast majority of nations on Earth have outlawed this practice, it seems that humans have recognised what these acts are and treated them as such. Assault does not become something else simply because the perpetrator trying to justify himself attempts to cloak his words in philosophical language. Ask any police detective.
Fred is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 10:15 AM   #12
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rocky Mountain Region
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Fred
Assault does not become something else simply because the perpetrator trying to justify himself attempts to cloak his words in philosophical language.
Amen to that.

Euphemistic language leads to weakness.
TwEek is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 12:16 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Massachusetts, USA -- Let's Go Red Sox!
Posts: 1,500
Default Re: Re: Child sexual abuse Vs Rape.

Quote:
Originally posted by diana
I think the psychological scars of child sexual abuse (not necessarily what I would call "rape," as it connotes [force] to me) have more potential to cause lasting damage than with the rape of adults. Not that it necessarily will, you understand, but generally speaking, the child has far less defense.
Interestingly, reproductive-aged females suffer the highest level of distress from sexual assaults, probably as an adaptive counter-rape-mechanism (they are the most likely group to fall victim to it, and, in terms of reproductive fitness, have the most to lose).

See Thornhill & Thornhill, 1990, 1983, 1991; Baker & Bellis, 1995.

Personally, I think the outrage at child molestation is probably a fusion of human nepotism and empathy.

-GFA
God Fearing Atheist is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 01:45 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Default Re: Re: Re: Child sexual abuse Vs Rape.

Quote:
Originally posted by God Fearing Atheist
Interestingly, reproductive-aged females suffer the highest level of distress from sexual assaults, probably as an adaptive counter-rape-mechanism (they are the most likely group to fall victim to it, and, in terms of reproductive fitness, have the most to lose).
Should we assume that "probably" Hispanics have evolved a more "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" since they also suffer higher levels of distress from rape. (Am J Orthopsychiatry 1993 Oct; 63(4):623-32 Cultural beliefs about rape and victims' response in three ethnic groups. Lefley HP, Scott CS, Llabre M, Hicks D)

How does this adaptive counter-rape mechanism figure into the greater sexual distress more common for women attacked by intimates (Violence Vict 1993 Summer; 8(2):121-34 Victim-offender relationship and sexual assault. Ullman SE, Siegel JM.)?

How does the "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" explain the strongest predictors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following rape: 1) a history of depression, 2) alcohol abuse, or 3) experienced injury during the rape, and not age or fertility (J Anxiety Disord 1999 Nov-Dec; 13(6):541-63 Risk factors for rape, physical assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder in women: examination of differential multivariate relationships.Acierno R, Resnick H, Kilpatrick DG, Saunders B, Best CL.)?

Is it because "in terms of reproductive fitness, they have the most to lose" that the "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" so neatly explains the negative correlation with paternal emotional warmth and positive correlation with paternal rejection in the level of emotional trauma experienced by juvenile male rape victims (Child Abuse Negl 1998 Sep;22(9):889-99 Juvenile male rape victims: level of post-traumatic stress related to personality and parenting. Ruchkin VV, Eisemann M, Hagglof B.)?

That a single or even a few statistic fits with a particular concept does not mean that the concept is correct if it can't predict or explain other, related phenomena.

Rick
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 03:08 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Cool Re: Re: Re: Re: Child sexual abuse Vs Rape.

Quote:
Originally posted by Dr Rick
Should we assume that "probably" Hispanics have evolved a more "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" since they also suffer higher levels of distress from rape. (Am J Orthopsychiatry 1993 Oct; 63(4):623-32 Cultural beliefs about rape and victims' response in three ethnic groups. Lefley HP, Scott CS, Llabre M, Hicks D)

How does this adaptive counter-rape mechanism figure into the greater sexual distress more common for women attacked by intimates (Violence Vict 1993 Summer; 8(2):121-34 Victim-offender relationship and sexual assault. Ullman SE, Siegel JM.)?

How does the "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" explain the strongest predictors for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following rape: 1) a history of depression, 2) alcohol abuse, or 3) experienced injury during the rape, and not age or fertility (J Anxiety Disord 1999 Nov-Dec; 13(6):541-63 Risk factors for rape, physical assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder in women: examination of differential multivariate relationships.Acierno R, Resnick H, Kilpatrick DG, Saunders B, Best CL.)?

Is it because "in terms of reproductive fitness, they have the most to lose" that the "adaptive counter-rape-mechanism" so neatly explains the negative correlation with paternal emotional warmth and positive correlation with paternal rejection in the level of emotional trauma experienced by juvenile male rape victims (Child Abuse Negl 1998 Sep;22(9):889-99 Juvenile male rape victims: level of post-traumatic stress related to personality and parenting. Ruchkin VV, Eisemann M, Hagglof B.)?

That a single or even a few statistic fits with a particular concept does not mean that the concept is correct if it can't predict or explain other, related phenomena.

Rick
Gee, Rick. I was just going to ask how the study determines a particular group "suffers the highest level of distress." I'm wondering how they determine this, how this study was done, what the studied groups were (so I know "highest" of whom), and what the controls were.

Now I'm all intimidated and shit.

Have fun in Maui.

d
diana is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 07:04 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
Default Re: Re: Re: Child sexual abuse Vs Rape.

Quote:
Originally posted by God Fearing Atheist
Interestingly, reproductive-aged females suffer the highest level of distress from sexual assaults, probably as an adaptive counter-rape-mechanism (they are the most likely group to fall victim to it, and, in terms of reproductive fitness, have the most to lose).

See Thornhill & Thornhill, 1990, 1983, 1991; Baker & Bellis, 1995.

Personally, I think the outrage at child molestation is probably a fusion of human nepotism and empathy.
From the E/C Evolution of Rape thread, Dr Rick's summary of the pseudoscience behind such sociobiology is worth re-posting,
Quote:
In other words, the evolutionary rape hypothesis explains human rape, except when it doesn't. A characteristic of human rape is observed, and it is the job of the sociobiologist to think up a way it could have been adaptive. If the story seems plausible, it is accepted and the evolutionary basis for rape is now that much stronger. Those aspects of rape that don't offer any reproductive advantage are either deemed to be "environmental" or simply ignored. If a sociobiologic explanation seems to explain "most" of human rape, that's more than adequate.

Except that it's not. Scientific theories are supposed to be predictive, testable, and perhaps most important of all, potentially falsifiable; the adaptive rape hypothesis fails these criteria. If some aspect of rape corresponds to the adaptation story (ie reproductive age women are the most frequent vicitms of rape), the theory is confirmed. If not (ie. lots of non-reproductive-age women are raped, some men are raped, and many reproductive-age women are raped in manners not likely to result in conception), it’s because the environment and culture have played a role, or it's not "any more of a theoretical problem" than something else."

There is no set of observations or experments that could disprove the adaptive rape hypothesis. In the end, a belief that offers explanations with no potential falsifiability isn't really explanatory at all. A theory that only works when it works isn't particulary useful or predictive, and it isn't good science.
This would basically put sociobiology on a par with the astrologer who (hypothetically ) might "predict" an earthquake, after it had happened.
echidna is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 07:22 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 11
Default New Thought

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT STATING THAT I CONDONE, ENDORSE or think Positively in ANY WAY about child abuse in any form...saying that.........................



I propose this to any who would like to get really introspective:

Think about how society tends to be hypocritical when it comes to sex. We tell children sex is wonderful, great, but comes with certain risks such as stds, and pregnancy, HOWEVER, YOU(children) are NOT allowed to do it. As a child I would be saying to myself HUH???????....
Let me try to clarify....if people agree, as most do, that sex is beautful when wanted then why not let children 'go at it'. I speak both with another child and or an adult. It would seem to me (now I am NOT talking about any use of PHYSICAL force here) that an adult would be more careful with the child than another child woud, for obvious maturity reasons. The child and adult engage in sex and no physical harm occurs. Now you are probably saying to yourself :"well there is the MENTAL anguish", to that I say, and this is my major POINT...it is SOCIETY as a whole that causes the trauma in children who have had such experiences for if society did not look upon it as wrong(for reasons I went through) and thus the children were not told it was wrong their would be no mental trauma for most cases.
To sum up and bring us back to my beginning point, it is society that is hypocritical and causing the harm.

As I said firstly I do not condone such behaviour but I do so love to point out the hypocrisies in society and try to create thought.
pax_vobiscum3 is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 08:13 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,234
Default Re: Child sexual abuse Vs Rape.

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus
I have always considered child sexual abuse to be immoral because it is on par with rape: Prepubescent children being unlikely to be able to give their considered consent.

However, I can not help but notice that many, if not most people, seem to consider child sexual abuse a far far worse crime than rape. I am interested in the reasoning behind this. Is it a purely emotional matter? Perhaps the psychological scarring is deemed worse in child rape victims?

I assume I do not need the usual disclaimers pertaining to my own sexuality.
Define sexual abuse, please.
Totalitarianist is offline  
Old 05-09-2003, 08:23 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,832
Default Re: New Thought

Quote:
Originally posted by pax_vobiscum3
Now you are probably saying to yourself :"well there is the MENTAL anguish", to that I say, and this is my major POINT...it is SOCIETY as a whole that causes the trauma in children who have had such experiences for if society did not look upon it as wrong(for reasons I went through) and thus the children were not told it was wrong their would be no mental trauma for most cases.
To sum up and bring us back to my beginning point, it is society that is hypocritical and causing the harm.
pax_vobiscum3, while society does overly label children who have experienced intergenerational child sex as victims, with words like "abuse", "suffered", "inflicted", some with such experiences even report as adults no lasting trauma or even sense of regret. In a small number of instances they can even be seen as personally positive experiences.

But at the same time, the majority do report deep trauma and only few regard it as a positive experience, with one of the greatest consequences being the affect which it had to damage their ability of trust within personal relationships. Practically, adults have a role as nurturers and protectors of children, and predatory intergenerational child sex (look no further than the clergy, but also common within families), does anything BUT nurture and protect. Clearly self-interested predatory child sex exists as a negative practice and for an individual to come to this realisation that their childhood trust had been so violated, would clearly warrant a sense of deep concern and often trauma. Societal conditioning of such trauma is simply false. Is female circumcision not traumatic to a woman brought up under Shar’ia Law ? Is rape only traumatic to a woman in the U.S. because society tells her so ? No, I think you’ll find some society attitudes are more the product of objective reactions, than the causes of those reactions themselves.

Indeed paedophilia was largely a invisible issue for many decades, a taboo topic simply never discussed either publically or privately. Many of those who experienced intergenerational child sex during that period, subsequently report a massive relief at being able to voice their personal trauma during that time, victim trauma which could not have been societally prescribed, as claimed by those who promote intergenerational child sex, simply because there was no society attitude to the practice, ignored as it was.

No, I reject that all societal attitudes to paedophilia are the product of just societal conditioning.
echidna is offline  
Old 05-10-2003, 08:06 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: N.S.W.
Posts: 86
Default

While it is possible to put theory Y next to theory B, the fact of the matter is that abuse is not only mental, but physical.
One thing that has shaped the character of one of my sisters, who was raped at age 6, was the pain suffered while she endured her attackers adult penis and his greater strength. This caused physical damage and due to threats against her, she kept quiet. She has had medical problems all her life as a result.
As I discovered through my conversations with detectives and lawyers experienced in these matters it became apparent that children were effected by the entire event. Children do not seem to differentiate, they fear the sexual attacks and the threats of retribution if they speak up, equally. The presence of the adult forcing himself upon a defenceless child seems to have more impact than how society views abuse. My sisters were not aware of societies views when they were attacked, being 6 and 8 they had not yet been exposed to sex education. They were busy playing with their dolls.
Possibly better than asking for a definition of sexual abuse, it may be better to look at a definition of assault. Ultimately that is what sexual abuse is.
Fred is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.