Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-22-2002, 10:06 AM | #41 | |||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
SOMMS,
Since you feel it's perfectly ok to ignore what I actually typed in order to just make up your own conjecture, let me take this opportunity to return the shoddy argumentation in kind and base the following on your omission. So to recap: You wouldn't believe in the Great And Powerful Too RAH Loo even if somebody came up to you TODAY and... -said he was a messenger from TGAPTRL Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's not your fault. After all, you're obviously driven by unseen forces; like a puppet, who is clearly incapable of independent thought, otherwise your innate sense of intellectual integrity would have kicked in and recognized that your hypothetical was nothing more than blatantly unsupportable, sophomoric mental masturbation. Quote:
You presented no "actual facts," but I guess that just doesn't matter right? When a mind like yours has been corrupted, facts just don't make any difference, right? They're just annoying speed bumps in the road, slowing you down on your way to that straw man convention in Ohio. Why not try just once in your life to address someone's post directly? Just cut and paste exactly what I typed and go through it point by point and present honest counter-argumentation, if you are capable. I dare you. No, I double dog dare you, because to accuse me of "believing ONLY what I WANT to believe regardless of the actual facts" is to stand naked in a mirror a thousand feet high in Times Square pointing at yourself. Such childish skullduggery is typical of you cult zombies, so I shouldn't really be surprised, but every time you fling your intellectual feces thus, SOMMS, it still just shocks me to the bones. I "believe" only what I want to believe regardless of the actual facts? You worthless little touch-hole. Quote:
So, if you care to redeem yourself, here's how. Address the following as it is written in a point-by-point manner offering cogent, direct counter-argumentation based entirely upon well-reasoned logic. It will be the greatest stretch of your entire life, so don't worry, we will grade you leniently at first, but if you're at all interested in being considered a notch above rank amateur hack, here's your chance: <ol type="1">[*] Would you believe in the Great And Powerful Too RAH Loo based on a second hand story alone?[*] Would you believe in the Great And Powerful Too RAH Loo based on direct observation of its powers?[*] We know (and, presumably, God would too) that bodily "ascension into the cosmos" would only result in implosion and popsicles, so where was Jesus going when he "ascended into the cosmos?"[*] Since you won't be able to answer question number 3--and this will be the biggest stretch for your limited intelligence to make--don't you think it is more likely that a story about such a pointless bodily ascension into the "cosmos" at a time when everyone thought the sun revolved around the earth is evidence of fiction rather than non-fiction?[*] Since you will not answer question number 4 honestly and we all KNOW what the answer is ANYWAY regardless of the actual facts, since a bodily ascension into the cosmos does prove that the Jesus stories are nothing more than aggrandized myths (unless you'd like to now claim that Jesus was a "gray" ascending to his spaceship), why do you continue to pretend that such a blatant fraud actually occurred?[*] And, finally, don't you think that's a rather difficult and clumsy manner of travel for a being that can trifurcate into flesh and make human beings out of dirt and magically blink the entire universe into being ex nihilo?[/list=a] Think you can handle that, little clubber? No? Neither did any of us. [ February 22, 2002: Message edited by: Koyaanisqatsi ]</p> |
|||||||||||
02-22-2002, 10:25 AM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 5,441
|
Koy, you're being too easy on him - any one of us can answer this for him!
Watch, I'll demonstrate. Quote:
[ February 22, 2002: Message edited by: Zero Angel ]</p> |
|
02-22-2002, 10:28 AM | #43 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,745
|
Just once I'd like to see SOMMS answer Koy's questions directly. It would be so sweet, but alas, I doubt it will ever happen.
|
02-22-2002, 10:48 AM | #44 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,597
|
Quote:
As to your point that the question "why then?" could be raised at any point, it merely begs the question as to why He didn't stick around, and continue providing His message personally... Regards, Bill Snedden |
|
02-22-2002, 11:09 AM | #45 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
|
Quote:
|
|
02-22-2002, 11:13 AM | #46 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Yes, I have dyslexia. Sue me.
Posts: 6,508
|
Why, "soon," of course, Queen. Jesus is always doing things "soon."
|
02-22-2002, 12:09 PM | #47 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 8,745
|
Quote:
LOL! Don't worry QoS, JC will be around before this "generation" is through. |
|
02-23-2002, 12:34 AM | #48 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
|
Quote:
IOW, admitting the supernatural destroys the link between event and perception. If Being A is able to raise people from the dead, why should Being B be unable to make it appear to me or you as if people were raised from the dead, although it never happened ? We determine the reality ("what actually happened") around us by using purely naturalistic assumptions - e.g. that photons travel in (almost) straight lines and are not created in mid-air. Remove the naturalistic restraint and reality becomes indeterminable: we'll never know whether we have naturalistically perceived an actual miracle or miraculously perceived an actual non-miracle as a miracle. Quote:
Quote:
Regards, HRG. |
|||
02-23-2002, 07:44 AM | #49 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 889
|
HRG,
Quote:
Thus the atheistic viewpoint (here) dissolves to obscurity: Nothing can be known. If you witness something it could just be an illusion...so you better not believe it. This is completely counter to unbiased thought, which in this case (firsthand witness of miracles) delegates a most simple explanation of the facts: That forces unfamiliar to man (namely God's) are at play. Thoughts and comments welcomed. Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas |
|
02-23-2002, 07:47 AM | #50 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 889
|
Queen,
Quote:
What year is it? Satan Oscillate My Metallic Sonatas |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|