![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
|
This might be more appropriate for the Science and Skepticism forum, but it relates to the earlier thread about NDE's providing evidence for a soul or spirit. This is a link to a very recent report in Nature which shows that out-of-body perceptions, which are frequently part of NDE's can be produced by stimulating part of the cerebral cortex, specifically the right angular gyrus. I think it's certain that all these phenomena are the result of altered brain physiology and need no supernatural explanation. <a href="http://www.nature.com/nsu/020916/020916-8.html" target="_blank">http://www.nature.com/nsu/020916/020916-8.html</a>
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
|
Jerry:
Just an honest question. Can you honesstly think of one event that does 'need a supernatural explanation'? I can't, but... Keith. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Can you honesstly think of one event that does 'need a supernatural explanation'?
Cher? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
|
Can you honesstly think of one event that does 'need a supernatural explanation'?
You are absolutely correct. Poor phraseology on my part. But... Michael Jackson also comes to mind... [ October 16, 2002: Message edited by: JerryM ]</p> |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,842
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
|
JerryM, I moved that topic to the Non-Abrahamic Religions forum. Would you like me to do the same with this, or put it in Science&Skepticism, where I would say it more properly belongs? I'll wait for your response.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 1,100
|
I also think it should go to Science and Skepticism.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|