pz

Done.

rafe gutman

very funny. it'd be even funnier with references

hezekiah jones

Philosophers cannot agree on exactly where the line between science and non-science lies. Therefore, anything can be considered science if we say so.

Bingo theyeti. Meyer for Dummies. (Or is it Dummies for Meyer ...)

Nic Tamzek

A good idea. Could be implemented with footnotes including the relevant quotes for version 2.0.

Perhaps we should start a thread doing so over at AE...

theyeti

Already working on it. Since I'm going to close shop for the evening, I'll attach what I've got so far here, which covers most of it. Fell free to copy its contents over to AE and add to them. (It's a text file but with HTML formatting; apparently, HTML files can't be attached here -- I think it's time to upgrade to a new system. )

theyeti

P.S. If anyone wants to see it as HTML (which is much easier to view) just download it to your desktop or somewhere where you can find it, and change the extension on the end from .txt to .html. Then open up your favorite browser and select "open file" from the file menu, then choose the .html file you just made.

Silent Dave

Sorry . . . AE?


Dave

theyeti

http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin.../ikonboard.cgi

It's not very active for discussion (okay, not at all active) but it's a great place to archive various projects and good threads.

theyeti

theyeti

New and improved!

Now with references!

Go here right now:

http://people.musc.edu/~reulansn/IDism/hunch.html

Click on any of the links to get to the references page. Comments welcome (read: required).

theyeti

ruby-soho

theyeti,

Thanks for the updates and references. You've done an outstanding job describing the irreducible contradictions of ID pseudo-science, congratulations! I'll be sure to forward this link on to many of my friends.

Thanks again,

D

beausoleil

If I have seen less far than others, it's because I have midgets standing on my shoulders.