Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-15-2003, 04:28 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Just another hick from the sticks.
Posts: 1,108
|
Quote:
doov |
|
08-15-2003, 06:20 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2003, 06:37 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,570
|
signed
|
08-15-2003, 06:55 AM | #14 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The People's Republic of West Yorkshire
Posts: 498
|
Quote:
AFAIK petitiononline.com is a way for spammers to harvest e-mail addresses, and that is all it does. Even if the petition does get sent to "Michael Brawley, Holt, Rinehart and Winston", how seriously would you take a petition that could quite easily have been generated by a computer program that spits out thousands of random names and e-mail addresses? |
|
08-16-2003, 03:15 AM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
|
|
08-16-2003, 07:55 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
Quote:
What sort of academic attitude is supposed to be represented by such advice, anyhow? Of course the Internet is unmoderated, not peer-reviewed, hell, not reviewed at all. The qualifications for putting your theory of life on the net are effectively zero. Granting that they can't admit their wish to throw students into the arms of Hovind, AiG, and everyone else whose ravings are unpublishable by the weakest scientific standards, what's the authors' story for why they would give such absurd advice? The textbook might as well instruct students to hang out in front of the Kwik Stop for quality information about the origins of life. It's pathetic. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|