FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2002, 09:37 AM   #131
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 451
Post

Tell me more about your parents. Maybe you being screwed up in the head was just the placebo effect.

And yes, it's a personal attack. The first one you've gotten. I'll gladly stoop to your level, Mad "My Life Sucks So I'm Going To Take It Out On You" Kally. You want to flame people? Well guess what, I'll flame right back. Since you obviously have nothing more appropriate to add to the discussion, I don't want you to feel left out.

[ September 20, 2002: Message edited by: Veil of Fire ]</p>
Veil of Fire is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:41 AM   #132
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Median strip of DC beltway
Posts: 1,888
Post

Maybe everyone needs to take a step back and a deep breathe.
NialScorva is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:43 AM   #133
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
Post

rbochnermd ....I'm beggining to think you have a serious problem. Do you not see the distinct difference in my posts that you call "insults"?

I am "insulting" the "facts" they report, and the posturing of people who talk as if they run the world and should be in charge of other peoples lives.

I am not spewing pointless vulgarities(enemas and such) and saying people are full of shit etc.

You have shown utter disrespect and a lack of decorum that I find hard to believe is permissible in this forum.

I have nothing more to say to you...

[ September 20, 2002: Message edited by: SirenSpeak ]</p>
Pseudonymph is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:45 AM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Talking

...thank god.
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:46 AM   #135
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Talking

take your ignert friends with ya..
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:49 AM   #136
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Veil of Fire:
<strong>Tell me more about your parents. Maybe you being screwed up in the head was just the placebo effect.</strong>
Watch it! I'm making a VOODOO doll.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:53 AM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Veil of Fire:
<strong>So, Rick, it's ok for you to be a prick if someone else is too? Once again, atheists show complete dismissal of the golden rule.</strong>
Your post is a hypocritical double-standard...

Quote:
<strong>Rick, at no point has anyone made a PERSONAL ATTACK against you... but that's all you seem capable of doing.</strong>
...and your assertion here is just an out-and-out lie.

Rick

[ September 20, 2002: Message edited by: rbochnermd ]</p>
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:55 AM   #138
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 451
Post

Here Rick, let me break down Corwin's argument into little words, so maybe you can comprehend it.

Let's assume a few things.

1) Bill is not an acupunture practitioner or enthusiast.
2) Bill claims that acupuncture is supposed to cure cancer.
3) Actual acupuncture practitioners and enthusiasts do NOT make the claim that cupuncture cures cancer.
4) Acupuncture does NOT cure cancer.

Your original assertion ("The origin of the claims is not the issue; the lack of objective evidence supporting them is,") seemed to imply that we can judge acupunture's efficacy based on Bill's claim, since it doesn't matter whether the claim comes from a practitioner or not. Since, indeed, acupuncture does not cure cancer, then Bill's argument is a proper debunking of acupuncture.

The problem with that is Bill's argument is a straw man. We cannot judge a practiced based on the straw men. Otherwise, it would be AS IF we based evolution theory on the straw men creationists dream up (cat from dog, for example).

Are we on the same page now?
Veil of Fire is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:57 AM   #139
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 451
Post

Quote:
...and your assertion here is just an out-and-out lie.
Really? Post some personal attacks (before I got here) that were directed at you. I'd love to see them, I've been reading this thread all day and can't find them.

Kally:
Your participation in this thread has shown just how much you really care about discussion versus making fun of people. Did your mommy teach you that?

Quote:
take your ignert friends with ya..
Maybe your utter uselessness when it comes to rational discussion of any topic is the placebo effect too.

[ September 20, 2002: Message edited by: Veil of Fire ]</p>
Veil of Fire is offline  
Old 09-20-2002, 09:58 AM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Veil of Fire:
<strong>Here Rick, let me break down Corwin's argument into little words, so maybe you can comprehend it.</strong>
Is this another example of no one insulting me?
Dr Rick is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.