FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2002, 06:31 PM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Here is a partial skeleton of an australopithicine from South Africa:

Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 06:46 PM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by LordValentine:
<strong>
I could go on for a long time.
</strong>
I've noticed that preachers tend to go on for
a long time, continually restating their
assertions. It would seem that repition is the
best education method for Homo Cretinist
(not to be confused with their sub-species,
Homo Gullibleus
Kosh is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:00 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
Post

Congrats, LordValentine. You have eraned this thread's honorary "Cretinist Overkill" worship smiley.

<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />

--W@L
Writer@Large is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 08:38 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,427
Post

As with Patrick's "overkill" posts, these are educational for non-creationists as well. That robust australopithecine skull is magnificent.

As I recall, "Turkana Boy" was the subject of an e-mail debate between Richard Milton (author of "Shattering the Myths of Darwinism") and a scientist. I don't remember exactly what the allegation was... has it ever been claimed that Turkana boy is a fake of some sort, or is it just believed by creationists to be a deformed human?

[ March 03, 2002: Message edited by: IesusDomini ]</p>
bluefugue is offline  
Old 03-03-2002, 10:08 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Post

LordV: I second W@L's overkill smilie: <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />

I would like to add that davidH seems to think only the dino's were effected by the K-T extinction. In fact, we see the erasure of just about the same ratio of mammals as everything else (i.e., 60-70% depending on who you ask). Every extant mammal genera took significant hits at the same time the dinos were cashing it in - and for the same reasons (obviously).
Quetzal is offline  
Old 03-04-2002, 03:22 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by IesusDomini:
<strong>As with Patrick's "overkill" posts, these are educational for non-creationists as well. That robust australopithecine skull is magnificent.

As I recall, "Turkana Boy" was the subject of an e-mail debate between Richard Milton (author of "Shattering the Myths of Darwinism") and a scientist. I don't remember exactly what the allegation was... has it ever been claimed that Turkana boy is a fake of some sort, or is it just believed by creationists to be a deformed human?
</strong>
The vast majority of creationist say that "Turkana Boy" is just what we would call a modern human. For Gish this would be a contradiction since it is very much like Peking and Java Man that he dismisses as "apes."
Jack Cuozzo, who is one of the more technically competent YECs dismisses Turkana Boy as an ape.
Hugh Ross, the OEC, even dismisses the Neandertals as apes.
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 03-04-2002, 03:38 PM   #27
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
Post

Well you can lump me in with those creationists as well, since I dismiss we homo sapiens as apes.
nogods4me is offline  
Old 03-04-2002, 06:00 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by nogods4me:
<strong>Well you can lump me in with those creationists as well, since I dismiss we homo sapiens as apes. </strong>
I guess you are what they call in systematics a "lumper." :-)

So are humans Pan sapiens? :-)
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 03-04-2002, 06:36 PM   #29
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
Post

Well, I'd certainly like to give the likes of Messrs Hovind, Ross, et. al a few lumps. Does that make me a lumper?
nogods4me is offline  
Old 03-05-2002, 06:31 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Might as well post a couple more fossils today.

Today's fossils come from Georgia. Not the state, but the country and former Soviet republic.
Dmanisi, Georgia has had some recent discoveries of Homo ergaster:



and



Notice that they so obviously related to humans and yet I have never seen anyone with skulls like that.
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:02 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.